On Jul 22, 2009, at 5:35 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
What is HasStandardGetOwnPropertySlot adding? Is it testable?
It’s an optimization.
If it’s set, then the JavaScript engine won’t even call
getOwnPropertySlot, saving the overhead of a virtual function call. If
it’s not set, then the engine
Never mind. I've looked at the source, and understand enough to see
that that looks like a bad idea. Autogen'd constructors seem to
always assume that the ConstructorTable will be non-empty, and thus
they need to have a custom getOwnPropertySlot. So I'll leave the
autogen'd code for now. It doe
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> Now from the right email address.
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> > http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/45938 added DOMConstructorObject, but
> > did not change most constructors (the autogen'd ones).
> >
> >
> > I'm now
Now from the right email address.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/45938 added DOMConstructorObject, but
> did not change most constructors (the autogen'd ones).
>
>
> I'm now removing the autogen'd createStructure and making all
> constructors
4 matches
Mail list logo
