Two questions about latest build system

Hello, I'm running Eclipse 3.4.1, and WOLips nightly 3.4.5561. I have two questions about the new build system: 1. I have an application project that depends on a framework project (actually, more than one). I'm back to using the incremental build system for development, in which case

Re: About instance's integrity.

Hello, Thank you all for many helpful answers! I have checked ERJGroupsSynchronizer and JGroup. And I have considered hours and searched more hours. And I found open terracotta. http://www.terracotta.org/ http://www.c2b2.co.uk/iP

Re: About instance's integrity.

On Nov 23, 2008, at 7:39 AM, dododo2020 dododo2020 wrote: Don't you think terracotta's approach can enhance WO significantly with or without EO? I don't think terracotta is that interesting at the EOF layer. It might be useful if applied to WOSessions. There's been some discussion of this

Re: BigDecimal WOes

On 23 Nov 2008, at 03:11, Chuck Hill wrote: How is the attribute defined in the model? It sounds like the value type might be wrong. Ah! that fixed it :-) I guess I'm so used to picking String and int for my value types that, lo and behold, there are other types in the popup no that I'm

Re: EO Table creation failing

No biggie anymore for me I guess ,as I know how to get around the problem, but thought maybe someone might want to look into the Frontbase SQL generator code. Again, I think the answer is that it is NOT using the plugin like you think it is. Mike might have some debugging you can turn on.

Attribute Locking Tips

Quote: I tend to just turn off locking for those columns where there are time-stamps and non-integral numerical values. In response to my BigDecimal WOes thread I got another comment, above, on turning off column locks on time-stamps and non-integral values. You didn't see this comment, if

Re: About instance's integrity.

I think WO is the best tool but EO is not for everyone. I would agree with this ... EOF is excellent, but there are aspects that I wish were more configurable. That said, I have never found a problem that I couldn't solve. When I try to find developers for WO other than me,it was difficult

Re: Attribute Locking Tips

Neil, think about locking on attributes that should not change, or ones that you want your update to fail if they have changed since your data was last fetched. Depending on each entity, you will probably have different criteria --- from turning on all locks to turning off all but the id.

Re: Two questions about latest build system

On Nov 23, 2008, at 2:46 AM, Paul Hoadley wrote: Hello, I'm running Eclipse 3.4.1, and WOLips nightly 3.4.5561. I have two questions about the new build system: 1. I have an application project that depends on a framework project (actually, more than one). I'm back to using the incr

Re: About instance's integrity.

On Nov 23, 2008, at 4:39 AM, dododo2020 dododo2020 wrote: 1) Having caches for each instance is not efficient. Sharing cache is the best. Isn't a shared cache just a DBMS? Sure, you can RYO at great effort and expense -- and you will probably get better performance out of it, but unless

Re: Locking problems using ERJGroupsSynchronizer

On 22/11/2008, at 11:36 AM, Mike Schrag wrote: It looks like our locking problems went away (crossing fingers) after explicitly setting it to false. But man I can't figure out for the life of me why it would default to true... it defaults to true for backwards compatibility I'm curious to

Re: Workflow framework?

On 23/11/2008, at 4:27 AM, Mark Morris wrote: I wrote one a few years ago. From time to time I've thought about updating it as well as another framework and contributing them, if people might find them useful. +1 There are a few ways to approach workflow. Email me and we can see if wha

Re: Workflow framework?

I'll have to look in my archived stuff, I don't have it on my laptop anymore. It was done in WO 4.5 (Java), so it will definitely need some updating. The general approach is you define a workflow as queues and actions, and for each valid combination of queue and action while in that queue,

Re: versions

Hi Mike I did the all in one install eclipse 3.32 do i need to update anything?? I'd rather keep these kind of questions on the mailing list so other people can benefit from them ... That installer is out of pretty old at this point. I don't know what the state of it is for the stable branc

Fwd: EO Table creation failing

From: Jeff Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: November 23, 2008 1:04:27 PM EST To: Mike Schrag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: EO Table creation failing "If you're using the 5.4 built-in plugin or the plugin from FrontBase, it won't work with SQL generation from Entity Modeler or Wonder Migra

Re: About instance's integrity.

1) Having caches for each instance is not efficient. Sharing cache is the best. Isn't a shared cache just a DBMS? Sure, you can RYO at great effort and expense -- and you will probably get better performance out of it, but unless you have specific hardware requirements that preclude using

Re: Locking problems using ERJGroupsSynchronizer

It looks like our locking problems went away (crossing fingers) after explicitly setting it to false. But man I can't figure out for the life of me why it would default to true... it defaults to true for backwards compatibility I'm curious to know why the sec causes a lock up for this. I have

Re: Two questions about latest build system

1. I have an application project that depends on a framework project (actually, more than one). I'm back to using the incremental build system for development, in which case it seems like (after running Project > Clean... on everything) it's sufficient to run Project > Build Project on th

Re: Two questions about latest build system

On 24/11/2008, at 4:11 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: On Nov 23, 2008, at 2:46 AM, Paul Hoadley wrote: So here's my (two part) question: I take it WOLips is using ~/ Library/Application Support/WOLips/wolips.properties now---can I delete ~/Library/wobuild.properties? Yes. Can and should (to avoid

Re: Two questions about latest build system

On 24/11/2008, at 8:12 AM, Mike Schrag wrote: 1. I have an application project that depends on a framework project (actually, more than one). I'm back to using the incremental build system for development, in which case it seems like (after running Project > Clean... on everything) it's

directActionURLForActionNamed should not escape the URL

Hi! Is there any way to make WOContext's directActionURLForActionNamed method NOT escape the URL? This seems pretty dumb, as I might not want to use the URL in an HTML document... replacing & for & is a workaround that works in my case, but it's far from being a decent solution. You

Re: directActionURLForActionNamed should not escape the URL

WOActionURL? Ramsey On Nov 23, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote: Hi! Is there any way to make WOContext's directActionURLForActionNamed method NOT escape the URL? This seems pretty dumb, as I might not want to use the URL in an HTML document... replacing & for & is a workaround tha

Re: directActionURLForActionNamed should not escape the URL

On 23-Nov-08, at 6:06 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote: Hi! Is there any way to make WOContext's directActionURLForActionNamed method NOT escape the URL? This seems pretty dumb, as I might not want to use the URL in an HTML document... replacing & for & is a workaround that works in my case, but

Re: Locking problems using ERJGroupsSynchronizer

On 24/11/2008, at 8:30 AM, Mike Schrag wrote: It looks like our locking problems went away (crossing fingers) after explicitly setting it to false. But man I can't figure out for the life of me why it would default to true... it defaults to true for backwards compatibility I'm curious to kn

Re: Locking problems using ERJGroupsSynchronizer

On 23.11.2008, at 16:42, Lachlan Deck wrote: On 24/11/2008, at 8:30 AM, Mike Schrag wrote: It looks like our locking problems went away (crossing fingers) after explicitly setting it to false. But man I can't figure out for the life of me why it would default to true... it defaults to true

Re: Attribute Locking Tips

On 23 Nov 2008, at 17:33, George Domurot wrote: Neil, think about locking on attributes that should not change, or ones that you want your update to fail if they have changed since your data was last fetched. Depending on each entity, you will probably have different criteria --- from turni

Another cRazY problem

Hello, I just downloaded the latest Wonder 5.4 frameworks (not the jars), installed them by copying them to my /Library/Frameworks folder and now my project, which was fine before, says it can't find any of the ERX classes. e.g. the package pasted below says er.extensions.ERXGenericRe

Re: Another cRazY problem

On Nov 23, 2008, at 5:16 PM, Jeff Schmitz wrote: Hello, I just downloaded the latest Wonder 5.4 frameworks (not the jars), installed them by copying them to my /Library/Frameworks folder and now my project, which was fine before, says it can't find any of the ERX classes. e.g. the pa

Re: Another cRazY problem

What I just figured out is that I needed to update my WonderEntity templates used by the EOGenerator. I just changed the includes of the er.extensions packages to add the eof part, but now I'm wondering if I need to download a new version of these templates? If so, where can they be found

Re: About instance's integrity.

> > I think WO is the best tool but EO is not for everyone. > I would agree with this ... EOF is excellent, but there are aspects > that I wish were more configurable. That said, I have never found a > problem that I couldn't solve. > > When I try to find developers for WO other than me,it was dif

Re: Locking problems using ERJGroupsSynchronizer

On 24/11/2008, at 11:19 AM, Guido Neitzer wrote: On 23.11.2008, at 16:42, Lachlan Deck wrote: On 24/11/2008, at 8:30 AM, Mike Schrag wrote: It looks like our locking problems went away (crossing fingers) after explicitly setting it to false. But man I can't figure out for the life of me w