On Jul 26, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
> Hi Pascal;
>
>> I'm adding some mods in JavaMonitor too (for WOWODC) and Andrew Lindesay
>> also have stuff in LEWOStuff to use mod_proxy_ajp.
>
> I've actually taken that framework out again as I was not using it any more,
> but if anybody
RDS is more or less mysql 5.1, with a few goodies wrapped around it. they
haven't (as far as i know) added any bells or whistles to the core database
server - they've just automated the management of it.
my favourite goodies are point in time recovery and multi-availability zone
with auto fail ove
Hi Simon;
> ...amazon RDS for database server..
I see that's using MySQL –– does it somehow handle deferred referential
integrity checking?
cheers.
___
Andrew Lindesay
www.silvereye.co.nz
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ign
we don't use the wolastic images (we have our own) but we do deploy entirely
on the amazon ec2 cloud now. ec2 instances running standard javamonitor /
wotaskd, amazon RDS for database server, s3 for file storage etc.
scalability on demand, load balancing, redundancy across multiple
availability zon
I haven't tried it yet, but WOlastic looks like a *really* cool
deployment solution for WO.
http://wolastic.com/
Ramsey
On Jul 26, 2010, at 4:27 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:
Thanks for the thoughts guys!
Ken
On Jul 26, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Le 2010-07-26 à 12:55, Chuck Hill
Thanks for the thoughts guys!
Ken
On Jul 26, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
> Le 2010-07-26 à 12:55, Chuck Hill a écrit :
>
>> On Jul 26, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
>>
>>> I've been asked to comment on the best way to deploy WebObjects today
>>> without any "imposed" res
Hi Pascal;
> I'm adding some mods in JavaMonitor too (for WOWODC) and Andrew Lindesay also
> have stuff in LEWOStuff to use mod_proxy_ajp.
I've actually taken that framework out again as I was not using it any more,
but if anybody wants it, happy to pass on the material. It did work quite well
> Actually, we were locking the DBCntxt. We are reloading some EOModels, and it
> seemed to be necessary to invalidate objects:
Can you say why you are doing such an ungodly thing?
Cheers, Anjo
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will b
Le 2010-07-26 à 12:55, Chuck Hill a écrit :
> On Jul 26, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
>
>> I've been asked to comment on the best way to deploy WebObjects today
>> without any "imposed" restrictions. I haven't done any new deployments in a
>> long while, so I'm likely not up to date
On Jul 24, 2010, at 1:51 AM, Farrukh Ijaz wrote:
> Thanks Chuck and Ramsey for quick response.
>
> I don't know what was the case. Whether the editingContexts where overlapping
> or not. Before I was using:
>
> a.delete();
> editingContext().saveChanges(); // This is the same editing context w
Hi Marc,
On Jul 26, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Marc Guenther wrote:
> On 23.07.2010, at 16:55, Chuck Hill wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2010, at 5:08 AM, Marc Guenther wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We recently had some deadlock problems involving EC and OSC locking, and I
>>> would like to validate my thoughts with t
I think AjaxAccordion does not work.
I tried to play with it a year or two ago when I first started playing with
Wonder, and was never able to get it to work correctly. I believe the
underlying javascript framework (Rico) is broken. It is of course possible
that this has been fixed in more r
On Jul 26, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
> I've been asked to comment on the best way to deploy WebObjects today without
> any "imposed" restrictions. I haven't done any new deployments in a long
> while, so I'm likely not up to date on the last. What are people using
> today, and why
We use out of the box womonitor on linux or OSX and embed all the frameworks.
- James
On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
> I've been asked to comment on the best way to deploy WebObjects today without
> any "imposed" restrictions. I haven't done any new deployments in a long
>
I've been asked to comment on the best way to deploy WebObjects today without
any "imposed" restrictions. I haven't done any new deployments in a long
while, so I'm likely not up to date on the last. What are people using today,
and why do they think it's the best?
Thanks much!
Ken __
On 2010-07-26, at 9:25 AM, David Holt wrote:
> Thanks everyone,
>
> Using the tip at the debugging page to include log output in the launchdaemon
> plist, I then checked the error logs for womonitor on startup which revealed
> a permissions issue:
*wotaskd* not womonitor
>
> Don't have perm
Thanks everyone,
Using the tip at the debugging page to include log output in the launchdaemon
plist, I then checked the error logs for womonitor on startup which revealed a
permissions issue:
Don't have permission to write to Configuration Directory
/Library/WebObjects/Configuration/ as this
Two dialogs wins it!
- j-
On Jul 26, 2010, at 10:58 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
> I would have 2 different dialogs - one where the user selects the type, then
> instantiate the object and hook up the fields.
>
> Ken
>
> On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:54 AM, James Cicenia wrote:
>
>> Hello -
>>
>> I wa
LOL
Not on this app!
Though I do have a WIP app that is based on the fabuloso ERModernLook ERD2W!
- j-
On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
> I would use an ERDControllerButton instead of a new button. Then you could
> have them select the type from the start. You're using ER
I would use an ERDControllerButton instead of a new button. Then you
could have them select the type from the start. You're using ERD2W,
right?
Ramsey
On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:54 AM, James Cicenia wrote:
Hello -
I was wondering what is the best way to approach this issue.
Normally, when s
I would have 2 different dialogs - one where the user selects the type, then
instantiate the object and hook up the fields.
Ken
On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:54 AM, James Cicenia wrote:
> Hello -
>
> I was wondering what is the best way to approach this issue.
>
> Normally, when someone clicks new i
Make it a two step process where they select the type first? If all of the
data is the same for all types, I will suggest that you are misusing
inheritance. Perhaps Role, not Type, is what you want?
Chuck
On Jul 26, 2010, at 8:54 AM, James Cicenia wrote:
> Hello -
>
> I was wondering what
Hello -
I was wondering what is the best way to approach this issue.
Normally, when someone clicks new i will instantiate a new object.
Then my edit/add dialog is the same and I just reference the current object
that is either new or existing and the bindings all work nice.
However in this insta
Hi,
On 23.07.2010, at 16:55, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 23, 2010, at 5:08 AM, Marc Guenther wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We recently had some deadlock problems involving EC and OSC locking, and I
>> would like to validate my thoughts with the list.
>>
>> As a very basic rule with everything multithread
24 matches
Mail list logo
