On Sep 28, 2010, at 10:37 PM, Tim Worman wrote:
On Sep 28, 2010, at 2:41 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Sep 28, 2010, at 2:27 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
He's active on Twitter, @tuparev
Dude. I don't twitter.
i don't believe it -- http://twitter.com/chillatgvc
ms
:-) Well, you gotta
I am altering a project (adding a relation) and I don't understand the Flatten
relationship option.
this will be a many to many. I just don't understand what flattening does. I
started googling and so far the answers don't click.
what's happening in a flattened vs an un-flattened relationship.
Le 2010-09-29 à 06:42, Theodore Petrosky a écrit :
I am altering a project (adding a relation) and I don't understand the
Flatten relationship option.
this will be a many to many. I just don't understand what flattening does. I
started googling and so far the answers don't click.
Good morning!
Yesterday, I committed REST routes inside JavaMonitor, this is the stuff that
was demonstrated at WOWODC 2010. With those routes + the direct actions Anjo
added last year, you can control almost everything remotely (make sure
JavaMonitor is not open to the world!). The code was
On Sep 29, 2010, at 6:55 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Good morning!
Yesterday, I committed REST routes inside JavaMonitor, this is the stuff that
was demonstrated at WOWODC 2010. With those routes + the direct actions Anjo
added last year, you can control almost everything remotely (make
so I am creating a little test.
I have a People and a Job entity.
attributes:
People has a personName attribute
and
Job has a jobtitle
I created the many to many selecting the Flatten Relationship option.
I get a new entity: PeopleJob
so far so good.
I see in _Job.java a method:
Hi!
I had the idea I saw, in some W(O)W(O)DC, someone talking about having a
unique checkbox on Entity Modeler for a property. That would make the
generated SQL have the UNIQUE constraint to the DB.
Did I dream about this, or is it real? I can not find it anywhere.
Regards,
Miguel
Ted
Conceptually, if the association entity (PeopleJob) is just that an association
between the two EO's and no other attributes are on the the association then
Flatten is good. However, if you have another attribute such as isPrimary on
the PeopleJob or startDate then flatten would not be
inline: NEwEntityIndex.jpg
Constraint setting on the index can then be set to 'Distinct' (which I assume
is unique in database speak). Not sure if this works for all database platforms
though.
On Sep 29, 2010, at 9:35 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
I had the idea I saw, in some W(O)W(O)DC,
Hi!
Thanks! Doesn't seem to work on PostgreSQL. :(
Regards,
Miguel Arroz
On 2010/09/29, at 14:43, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
NEwEntityIndex.jpg
Constraint setting on the index can then be set to 'Distinct' (which I assume
is unique in database speak). Not sure if this works for all
http://developer.apple.com/legacy/mac/library/documentation/InternetWeb/Reference/WO542Reference/com/webobjects/eoaccess/EOEntityIndex.html
EOEntityIndex is new in 5.4.x and would require plugin support for it
to work. I assume that is at least one of the reasons why it does not
work with
I am guessing is needs to be implemented in the appropriate db platform plugin
or SQLHelper class in Wonder. it is probably implemented in FB since that
probably would have been what Mike S was using when he added that feature.
On Sep 29, 2010, at 9:48 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
OK, well in that case, the new WO54 wonder branch is an opportunity for someone
with time on their hands to implement it ;-)
-Kieran
On Sep 29, 2010, at 10:00 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
the bigger issue is that the 5.3 and 5.4 schema generation API's aren't
compatible, so if you use the 5.3 API's, you hit these weird API paths that
bypass certain features. it's kind of a mess. currently migrations and entity
modeler both use the 5.3 API's. now that we have a 5.4 branch, we can
Good job Robert, er, sorry I meant Elvis ;-)
On Sep 29, 2010, at 6:55 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Good morning!
Yesterday, I committed REST routes inside JavaMonitor, this is the stuff that
was demonstrated at WOWODC 2010. With those routes + the direct actions Anjo
added last year, you can
Le 2010-09-29 à 10:10, Kieran Kelleher a écrit :
Good job Robert, er, sorry I meant Elvis ;-)
Just a note, it's not for Elvis the singer, it's for Elvis Gratton :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVHs12e-Fgc
On Sep 29, 2010, at 6:55 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Good morning!
i don't think FB does it either ... if entity modeler just called the 5.4
generation method, it would magically appear, probably.
ms
On Sep 29, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
I am guessing is needs to be implemented in the appropriate db platform
plugin or SQLHelper class in
On Sep 29, 2010, at 7:00 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
http://developer.apple.com/legacy/mac/library/documentation/InternetWeb/Reference/WO542Reference/com/webobjects/eoaccess/EOEntityIndex.html
EOEntityIndex is new in 5.4.x and would require plugin support for it to
work. I assume that is at
On Sep 29, 2010, at 11:41 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Sep 29, 2010, at 7:00 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
http://developer.apple.com/legacy/mac/library/documentation/InternetWeb/Reference/WO542Reference/com/webobjects/eoaccess/EOEntityIndex.html
EOEntityIndex is new in 5.4.x and would require
http://developer.apple.com/legacy/mac/library/documentation/InternetWeb/Reference/WO542Reference/com/webobjects/eoaccess/EOEntityIndex.html
EOEntityIndex is new in 5.4.x and would require plugin support for it to
work. I assume that is at least one of the reasons why it does not work
with
I'm not dead yet! I think I'll go for a walk... (thump) Yes, my
pre-burial grave site just had a small earth tremor.
Busy finishing up old projects and about to jump back into the latest
3.6.1 w/ Wonder 5.4 branch goodness for ERModern stuff. Hopefully its
not breaking daily at this point. D2W
Hi list,
I am planning a new project with heavy load. No HTML output, just plists. Lots
of users, small data footprint (about 10k per request). PostgreSQL.
I consider using WO and EOF again because it served me well in the last
(almost) 15 years. But I am not sure about the current status.
The
Le 2010-09-29 à 14:28, Alexander Spohr a écrit :
Hi list,
I am planning a new project with heavy load. No HTML output, just plists.
Lots of users, small data footprint (about 10k per request). PostgreSQL.
I consider using WO and EOF again because it served me well in the last
(almost)
On Sep 29, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Alexander Spohr wrote:
Hi list,
I am planning a new project with heavy load. No HTML output, just plists.
Lots of users, small data footprint (about 10k per request). PostgreSQL.
I consider using WO and EOF again because it served me well in the last
And for you app, you may want to look at ERRest framework.
Paul
On Sep 29, 2010, at 2:31 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Sep 29, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Alexander Spohr wrote:
Hi list,
I am planning a new project with heavy load. No HTML output, just plists.
Lots of users, small data footprint
Hi Tim,
Sorry to be slow replying; day job busy at present!
My NavigationMenu.plist looks like this:
(
{
name = Root;
children = (Home, Patients, Reports / letters,
Families, Biobank, Messages, My profile, Admin, Logout);
},
{
On 24/Sep/2010, at 11:37 AM, Alan Ward wrote:
My vote is that you are crazy. :-) This becomes an issue in apps where
users concurrently edit the same object. Out of the box, it is last in wins
and the second user to save gets no warning that what they are actually
editing is not what
I spoke to our Oracle guy, and he says that we should maintain one connection
to one server, so it shouldn't be possible for us to get one record from one,
and a different from the other. So much for that idea!
On Sep 24, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
It's Oracle RAC, so yes, a
Hi!
On 2010/09/29, at 21:31, Mark Ritchie wrote:
(Who's now back from traveling and working through the e-mail backlog. ;-)
I was starting to get worried about you! ;)
Regards,
Miguel Arroz
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will
My vote is that you are crazy. :-) This becomes an issue in apps where
users concurrently edit the same object. Out of the box, it is last in
wins and the second user to save gets no warning that what they are
actually editing is not what they were looking at.
Right, but there are
On 29/Sep/2010, at 1:39 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
My vote is that you are crazy. :-) This becomes an issue in apps where
users concurrently edit the same object. Out of the box, it is last in
wins and the second user to save gets no warning that what they are
actually editing is not what
My vote is that you are crazy. :-) This becomes an issue in apps where
users concurrently edit the same object. Out of the box, it is last in
wins and the second user to save gets no warning that what they are
actually editing is not what they were looking at.
Right, but there are
Hi List
I just read this morning on a thread about state of WO.
I have great confidence it the future but was not sure if I misread
something.
Has Apple ceased active development of WO and is it now in the hands
of the WO Community with projects such as WONDER?
Does Apple support its
On 29/Sep/2010, at 1:46 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
so we are in agreement :)
Sure, I'll go with that! ;-)
M.
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
On Sep 29, 2010, at 4:49 PM, Gino Pacitti wrote:
Hi List
I just read this morning on a thread about state of WO.
I have great confidence it the future but was not sure if I misread
something.
Has Apple ceased active development of WO and is it now in the hands
of the WO Community with
On Sep 29, 2010, at 1:49 PM, Gino Pacitti wrote:
Hi List
I just read this morning on a thread about state of WO.
I have great confidence it the future but was not sure if I misread something.
Has Apple ceased active development of WO and is it now in the hands of the
WO Community with
Hello everyone,
I patched MySQLPlugin locally with the patch that Simon McLean submitted 5 days
ago (JIRA WONDER-600, http://issues.objectstyle.org/jira/browse/WONDER-600). If
you use MySQL, can you try this version and let us know if the patch is working
for you?
Hi,
not really any of my business but am I the only one who finds this approach
unsettling ?
NSTimestamps are points in time. They are not NSDatestamps. Why mess with the
comparison by setting to zero hours, minute and seconds ? Why not just minutes
and seconds or again, may be dates too so
On 30/09/2010, at 10:21 AM, Louis Demers wrote:
In my app, when that's the behaviour I want, I zero out the data before
writing it to the database so that subsequent checks for equality will
return values...
FWIW, I've found that the only clean solution to this problem is to abandon
using
On Sep 29, 2010, at 9:40 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 30/09/2010, at 10:21 AM, Louis Demers wrote:
In my app, when that's the behaviour I want, I zero out the data before
writing it to the database so that subsequent checks for equality will
return values...
FWIW, I've found that the
Piling on here. As Louis pointed out, NSTimestamps are points in time.
Messing with that in prototypes is a Bad Idea. You will regret. Have you
crossed a DST boundary yet in your testing? And making one database behave
differently than others seems at least unwise.
If you want a calendar
An NSTimestamp represents a point in time, as has been stated. Making it
behave differently is a bad idea.
I have a set of methods that determine today's date in GMT, and store things
that are dates that way. I've never had a problem. I pull out the year,
month, and day from a timestamp
You are not making me hate dates any less. :-)
On Sep 29, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:
An NSTimestamp represents a point in time, as has been stated. Making it
behave differently is a bad idea.
I have a set of methods that determine today's date in GMT, and store things
that
Sorry Chuck - I hate them too :)
On Sep 29, 2010, at 11:17 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
You are not making me hate dates any less. :-)
On Sep 29, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:
An NSTimestamp represents a point in time, as has been stated. Making it
behave differently is a bad
44 matches
Mail list logo
