Hello,
I'm after some general modelling advice. I've been using inheritance for years
to model app-specific versions of a framework-level Person (user) entity. This
works well enough, though it presents the same small headaches time after time
for each new application.
I also have a
hi for all,
Maven 3 supports parallel building - -T number_of_threads option.
but wolifecycle-plugin is not threadSafe:
[WARNING] *
[WARNING] * Your build is requesting parallel execution, but project *
[WARNING] * contains
On 25/05/2012, at 1:14 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 3:03 AM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
= restrictedChoiceKey = object.availableStatuses
where availableStatuses() is a method on Provision that returns 'new
NSArrayStatus(Status.values());'.
I'm getting an
my guess is that your regex pattern for er.javamail.emailPattern doesn't work.
i'm not even going to try debugging that one, though. what's wrong with the
pattern that's built into erjavamail?
On May 29, 2012, at 2:43 AM, Ron X ron.x.by...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
i have some strange error on
A create page should have an object. Depending on how you created the page, you
may have forgotten to set the object though.
Ramsey
On May 29, 2012, at 4:11 AM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 25/05/2012, at 1:14 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 3:03 AM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
=
Paul,
My first question would be - how do you actually benefit from having this data
separated? Is there a reason that you don't just create a new entity for the
new project that can represent the entire organization?
If the reason is that you have code that you would typically use in more
This is the problem that Partial Entities were attempting to solve (
http://webobjects.mdimension.com/hudson/job/Wonder/javadoc/er/extensions/partials/package-summary.html
). I would consider it experimental, but if anyone wants to take it and finish
it, go for it.
ms
On May 29, 2012, at 1:40
I have noticed these messages too and would like to know if there is anything
that can be done about them
Tim
On 29/05/2012, at 23:31, Ron Lift rpgi...@gmail.com wrote:
At work we are migrating from RHEL 5 to RHEL 6 and also upgrading to Tomcat
6. When I deploy the current application
Hello all:
I've been testing out some of the Moo Tools components when I have a chance.
Today I've been trying some of the options for in place text fields. I just
want to see if a problem I'm having is actually a problem with the operator. :-)
I've inserted the fancy in place editor into my
Hi Tim,
I'm battling the flu right now. So I'm about ready to go crashing into my
keyboard but I believe
it's in MTWonder.js file:
var MTAjaxInPlace = {
saveFunctionName: function(id) {
return window. + id + Save;
},
cancelFunctionName:
Johnny:
Feel better.
That's what I needed. I kept trying to inspect the page but couldn't find how
the functions were being generated. This makes sense. Thanks much!
Tim
On May 29, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Johnny Miller jlmil...@kahalawai.com wrote:
Hi Tim,
I'm battling the flu right now. So
Hi Ron,
https://github.com/wolips/wolips/tree/master/maven2/maven-wolifecycle-plugin
Cheers,
Henrique
On 29/05/2012, at 04:13, Ron X wrote:
hi for all,
Maven 3 supports parallel building - -T number_of_threads option.
but wolifecycle-plugin is not threadSafe:
[WARNING]
Hi Ken,
On 30/05/2012, at 3:10 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
My first question would be - how do you actually benefit from having this
data separated?
I don't. It's just a side effect of wanting to have an app-specific EO based
on a more general framework-level EO.
Is there a reason that you
In the absence of the fancier solution (something like partial entities), I
think I would make an app variant of the entity (where the class of the app one
extends the class of the framework one) and model-rewrite the non-app variant
to be the app variant.
ms
On May 29, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Paul
On 30/05/2012, at 7:55 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
In the absence of the fancier solution (something like partial entities), I
think I would make an app variant of the entity (where the class of the app
one extends the class of the framework one) and model-rewrite the non-app
variant to be the
This is the problem that Partial Entities were attempting to solve (
http://webobjects.mdimension.com/hudson/job/Wonder/javadoc/er/extensions/partials/package-summary.html
). I would consider it experimental, but if anyone wants to take it and
finish it, go for it.
By experimental, is it
Hi Ramsey,
On 30/05/2012, at 1:10 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
A create page should have an object. Depending on how you created the page,
you may have forgotten to set the object though.
I've just modified the MainNavigationController class that ships with the
ModernLook template. Eventually
FrameworkPerson (and all code in the framework refers to that) and AppPerson
(extends FrameworkPerson class, and all app code refers to that). When your
models load, replace FrameworkPerson entity with AppPerson entity, so fetches
for FrameworkPerson are secretly the equivalent to what
That just creates the edit page. I believe you still need to epi.setObject().
On May 29, 2012, at 3:30 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
Hi Ramsey,
On 30/05/2012, at 1:10 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
A create page should have an object. Depending on how you created the page,
you may have forgotten to
On 30/05/2012, at 8:01 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
FrameworkPerson (and all code in the framework refers to that) and AppPerson
(extends FrameworkPerson class, and all app code refers to that). When your
models load, replace FrameworkPerson entity with AppPerson entity, so fetches
for
Oh, sorry. Misread the method name. I read it as editPageWithEntityNamed. Yes,
your object should exist. What's the stack trace again?
On May 29, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
Hi Ramsey,
On 30/05/2012, at 8:32 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
That just creates the edit page. I believe
On 30/05/2012, at 9:11 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
Oh, sorry. Misread the method name. I read it as editPageWithEntityNamed.
Yes, your object should exist. What's the stack trace again?
May 30 09:13:20 SurvStarAdmin[60371] WARN NSLog (CreateOrganisation) -
Here are the rules I'm using that relate to creating my entity with an enum
attribute:
60 : destinationEntity.name = 'Type' = localizeDisplayKeys = true
[com.webobjects.directtoweb.BooleanAssignment]
65 : (task = 'edit' and propertyKey = 'type') = componentName =
ERD2WEditToOneRelationship
On 2012-05-29, at 5:13 PM, David Holt wrote:
Here are the rules I'm using that relate to creating my entity with an enum
attribute:
60 : destinationEntity.name = 'Type' = localizeDisplayKeys = true
[com.webobjects.directtoweb.BooleanAssignment]
65 : (task = 'edit' and propertyKey =
It shouldn't have made it to the dataSource() method. You should log what rules
are firing for restrictedChoiceKey. Open your log4j page and set up a d2w rule
logger for that key. See what the console tells you when you load the page.
Ramsey
On May 29, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
This is only what I got in emailPattern in ERJavaMail properties: ^.*?@.*$
Is this what you are having to as default?
Cheers
- Original Message -
From: Mike Schrag
To: Ron X
Cc: WebObjects Development
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: ERJaveMail
my
26 matches
Mail list logo
