This is only what I got in emailPattern in ERJavaMail properties: "^.*?@.*$"
Is this what you are having to as default?
Cheers
- Original Message -
From: Mike Schrag
To: Ron X
Cc: WebObjects Development
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: ERJaveMail
my gu
It shouldn't have made it to the dataSource() method. You should log what rules
are firing for restrictedChoiceKey. Open your log4j page and set up a d2w rule
logger for that key. See what the console tells you when you load the page.
Ramsey
On May 29, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
>
On 2012-05-29, at 5:13 PM, David Holt wrote:
> Here are the rules I'm using that relate to creating my entity with an enum
> attribute:
>
> 60 : destinationEntity.name = 'Type' => localizeDisplayKeys = "true"
> [com.webobjects.directtoweb.BooleanAssignment]
> 65 : (task = 'edit' and propertyKe
Here are the rules I'm using that relate to creating my entity with an enum
attribute:
60 : destinationEntity.name = 'Type' => localizeDisplayKeys = "true"
[com.webobjects.directtoweb.BooleanAssignment]
65 : (task = 'edit' and propertyKey = 'type') => componentName =
"ERD2WEditToOneRelationship
On 30/05/2012, at 9:11 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
> Oh, sorry. Misread the method name. I read it as editPageWithEntityNamed.
> Yes, your object should exist. What's the stack trace again?
May 30 09:13:20 SurvStarAdmin[60371] WARN NSLog (CreateOrganisation) -
: Exception
occurred while handlin
Oh, sorry. Misread the method name. I read it as editPageWithEntityNamed. Yes,
your object should exist. What's the stack trace again?
On May 29, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
> Hi Ramsey,
>
> On 30/05/2012, at 8:32 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
>
>> That just creates the edit page. I beli
Hi Ramsey,
On 30/05/2012, at 8:32 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
> That just creates the edit page. I believe you still need to epi.setObject().
I can't believe I'm doubting a D2W guru, but are you _sure_? :-)
http://webobjects.mdimension.com/javadoc/WebObjects/5.4/com/webobjects/directtoweb/D2W.htm
On 30/05/2012, at 8:01 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> FrameworkPerson (and all code in the framework refers to that) and AppPerson
> (extends FrameworkPerson class, and all app code refers to that). When your
> models load, replace FrameworkPerson entity with AppPerson entity, so fetches
> for Framew
That just creates the edit page. I believe you still need to epi.setObject().
On May 29, 2012, at 3:30 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
> Hi Ramsey,
>
> On 30/05/2012, at 1:10 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
>
>> A create page should have an object. Depending on how you created the page,
>> you may have forgo
FrameworkPerson (and all code in the framework refers to that) and AppPerson
(extends FrameworkPerson class, and all app code refers to that). When your
models load, replace FrameworkPerson entity with AppPerson entity, so fetches
for FrameworkPerson are secretly the equivalent to what AppPerson
Hi Ramsey,
On 30/05/2012, at 1:10 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
> A create page should have an object. Depending on how you created the page,
> you may have forgotten to set the object though.
I've just modified the MainNavigationController class that ships with the
ModernLook template. Eventually
>> This is the problem that Partial Entities were attempting to solve (
>> http://webobjects.mdimension.com/hudson/job/Wonder/javadoc/er/extensions/partials/package-summary.html
>> ). I would consider it experimental, but if anyone wants to take it and
>> finish it, go for it.
>
> By "experimen
On 30/05/2012, at 7:55 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> In the absence of the fancier solution (something like partial entities), I
> think I would make an app variant of the entity (where the class of the app
> one extends the class of the framework one) and model-rewrite the non-app
> variant to be t
Hi Mike,
On 30/05/2012, at 3:17 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> This is the problem that Partial Entities were attempting to solve (
> http://webobjects.mdimension.com/hudson/job/Wonder/javadoc/er/extensions/partials/package-summary.html
> ). I would consider it experimental, but if anyone wants to ta
In the absence of the fancier solution (something like partial entities), I
think I would make an app variant of the entity (where the class of the app one
extends the class of the framework one) and model-rewrite the non-app variant
to be the app variant.
ms
On May 29, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Paul
Hi Ken,
On 30/05/2012, at 3:10 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
> My first question would be - how do you actually benefit from having this
> data separated?
I don't. It's just a side effect of wanting to have an app-specific EO based
on a more general framework-level EO.
> Is there a reason that you
Hi Ron,
https://github.com/wolips/wolips/tree/master/maven2/maven-wolifecycle-plugin
Cheers,
Henrique
On 29/05/2012, at 04:13, Ron X wrote:
> hi for all,
>
> Maven 3 supports parallel building - "-T " option.
>
> but wolifecycle-plugin is not threadSafe:
>
> [WARNING] **
Johnny:
Feel better.
That's what I needed. I kept trying to inspect the page but couldn't find how
the functions were being generated. This makes sense. Thanks much!
Tim
On May 29, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> I'm battling the flu right now. So I'm about ready to go
Hi Tim,
I'm battling the flu right now. So I'm about ready to go crashing into my
keyboard but I believe
it's in MTWonder.js file:
var MTAjaxInPlace = {
saveFunctionName: function(id) {
return "window." + id + "Save";
},
cancelFunctionName:
Hello all:
I've been testing out some of the Moo Tools components when I have a chance.
Today I've been trying some of the options for "in place" text fields. I just
want to see if a problem I'm having is actually a problem with the operator. :-)
I've inserted the fancy in place editor into my
I have noticed these messages too and would like to know if there is anything
that can be done about them
Tim
On 29/05/2012, at 23:31, Ron Lift wrote:
> At work we are migrating from RHEL 5 to RHEL 6 and also upgrading to Tomcat
> 6. When I deploy the current application that is running on
This is the problem that Partial Entities were attempting to solve (
http://webobjects.mdimension.com/hudson/job/Wonder/javadoc/er/extensions/partials/package-summary.html
). I would consider it experimental, but if anyone wants to take it and finish
it, go for it.
ms
On May 29, 2012, at 1:40
Paul,
My first question would be - how do you actually benefit from having this data
separated? Is there a reason that you don't just create a new entity for the
new project that can represent the entire organization?
If the reason is that you have code that you would typically use in more tha
A create page should have an object. Depending on how you created the page, you
may have forgotten to set the object though.
Ramsey
On May 29, 2012, at 4:11 AM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
> On 25/05/2012, at 1:14 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
>
>> On May 24, 2012, at 3:03 AM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
>>
>>> =
my guess is that your regex pattern for er.javamail.emailPattern doesn't work.
i'm not even going to try debugging that one, though. what's wrong with the
pattern that's built into erjavamail?
On May 29, 2012, at 2:43 AM, Ron X wrote:
> hi,
>
> i have some strange error on application start:
On 25/05/2012, at 1:14 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
> On May 24, 2012, at 3:03 AM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
>
>> => restrictedChoiceKey = "object.availableStatuses"
>>
>> where availableStatuses() is a method on Provision that returns 'new
>> NSArray(Status.values());'.
>>
>> I'm getting an IllegalStat
hi for all,
Maven 3 supports parallel building - "-T " option.
but wolifecycle-plugin is not threadSafe:
[WARNING] *
[WARNING] * Your build is requesting parallel execution, but project *
[WARNING] * contains the following plug
27 matches
Mail list logo
