Re: AjaxModalDialog and AjaxDatePicker

2013-07-30 Thread Theodore Petrosky
try this CSS: body #calendar_control { position: fixed !important; } it worked for me. Ted On Tue, 7/30/13, Lon Varscsak wrote: Subject: Re: AjaxModalDialog and AjaxDatePicker To: "Chuck Hill" Cc: "webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com" Date: Tue

Re: AjaxModalDialog and AjaxDatePicker

2013-07-30 Thread Chuck Hill
Hi Joee, Can you test this out with our usage and let us know if this change works there too? Thanks Chuck On 2013-07-30, at 5:21 PM, Lon Varscsak wrote: > lol, I'm not sure I can tell the users that. > > There is this line in the calendar.js: > > var result = [document.viewport.getScrol

Re: AjaxModalDialog and AjaxDatePicker

2013-07-30 Thread Lon Varscsak
lol, I'm not sure I can tell the users that. There is this line in the calendar.js: var result = [document.viewport.getScrollOffsets().left - $(el).cumulativeScrollOffset().left, document.viewport.getScrollOffsets().top - $(el).cumulativeScrollOffset().top]; Which results in [0,0] because the

Re: AjaxModalDialog and AjaxDatePicker

2013-07-30 Thread Chuck Hill
We see this too. Don't scroll? :-) My guess would be absolute vs relative positioning. Chuck On 2013-07-30, at 4:54 PM, Lon Varscsak wrote: > Hey all, > > I have an AjaxDatePicker on an AjaxModalDialog and am running into a bit of > trouble. If the page that is launching the AMD is scroll

AjaxModalDialog and AjaxDatePicker

2013-07-30 Thread Lon Varscsak
Hey all, I have an AjaxDatePicker on an AjaxModalDialog and am running into a bit of trouble. If the page that is launching the AMD is scrolled down at all, the AjaxDatePicker is in the wrong location (up at the top as though the page hadn't been scrolled). I can actually scroll (the background)

Re: Snow Leopard, Java 1.7, WebObjects

2013-07-30 Thread Bastian Triller
Did you try this < http://lists.apple.com/archives/webobjects-dev/2013/Apr/msg00023.html> ? On 30 Jul 2013 17:58, "Johan Henselmans" wrote: > > On 30 jul. 2013, at 17:10, Chuck Hill wrote: > > > It is the application you need to do this in, not wotaskd. wotaskd uses > a script to launch a new J

Re: create new to-many objects in d2w

2013-07-30 Thread Theodore Petrosky
this is the issue, and yes it is still an issue. Yes, please do a pull request, in the meantime is there any way I could get what you have? Ted On Jul 30, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Fabian Peters wrote: > Ted, > > I'm not entirely sure why you would want this behaviour. Is this still to do > wit

Re: create new to-many objects in d2w

2013-07-30 Thread Fabian Peters
Ted, I'm not entirely sure why you would want this behaviour. Is this still to do with your initial problem?: > If I add an object and immediately click its delete button, my app throws > a hissy-fit because the object can not be deleted as it is not saved in > the first place. T

Re: create new to-many objects in d2w

2013-07-30 Thread Jesse Tayler
should you be doing this with your EO? a job for didInsert() ? On Jul 30, 2013, at 12:05 PM, Theodore Petrosky wrote: > This is not directly a reply to David. I am about to try my hand at > implementing this in my app. > > David asks the sensible question if anyone thinks there is a bette

Re: Snow Leopard, Java 1.7, WebObjects

2013-07-30 Thread Johan Henselmans
Op 30 jul. 2013, om 17:10 heeft Chuck Hill het volgende geschreven: > It is the application you need to do this in, not wotaskd. wotaskd uses a > script to launch a new JVM for the app so changes to the JVM for wotaskd do > not affect the application. > > Chuck > > I also noticed this i

Re: create new to-many objects in d2w

2013-07-30 Thread Theodore Petrosky
This is not directly a reply to David. I am about to try my hand at implementing this in my app. David asks the sensible question if anyone thinks there is a better way to do this. Maybe someone can chime in here. Basically, in a D2W app with to Many relations, when you add a new relationship

Re: Snow Leopard, Java 1.7, WebObjects

2013-07-30 Thread Chuck Hill
Try the specific JVM: # JVM == /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.7.25/Commands/ java > Running the app from the command-line gives java 1.7, but running from > wotaskd gives the following log in Suggests that the user it is running under when wotaskd starts it ha

Re: Snow Leopard, Java 1.7, WebObjects

2013-07-30 Thread Johan Henselmans
On 30 jul. 2013, at 17:10, Chuck Hill wrote: > It is the application you need to do this in, not wotaskd. wotaskd uses a > script to launch a new JVM for the app so changes to the JVM for wotaskd do > not affect the application. > > Chuck > Been there, done that: ostadeserver:MacOS root#

RE: createPrototypeCache NullPointerException

2013-07-30 Thread Martin B
Thanks Fabian, I'm currently looking at both files, trying to compare them. The thing is that the Maven configuration file includes a lot more jars in the classpath that our previous configuration (like JavaWOJSPServlet and stuff like that) so I guess I will try to exclude a few things I don