Re: Abandonware???

No question in MY mind which it is! On 2015-10-02, 5:17 PM, "Hugi Thordarson" wrote: >If I make it, we will. I’ll allow you to decide if that’s a promise or a >threat :). > >- hugi > > >> Will we have fermented shark loin for breakfast? :-) >> >> On 2015-10-02, 3:55 PM, >> "webobjects-dev-bou

Re: Abandonware???

>> Apple silently killed WebObjects and abandoned it's users roughly a decade >> ago (in a somewhat less-than-honest manner (Floop-de-diddity-doo You, >> Apple)). >> >> But the community marches on. I’m constantly impressed by how this community >> survives and keeps what's essentially a dead p

Re: Abandonware???

If I make it, we will. I’ll allow you to decide if that’s a promise or a threat :). - hugi > Will we have fermented shark loin for breakfast? :-) > > On 2015-10-02, 3:55 PM, > "webobjects-dev-bounces+chill=gevityinc@lists.apple.com on behalf of > Pascal Robert" on behalf of prob...@macti

Re: Abandonware???

> On Oct 2, 2015, at 7:00 PM, Paul Yu wrote: > > Upon further reading of the wiki page. > > Due to copyright enforcement duration, it does us no good for us to declare > WebObjects and its frameworks abandoned by Apple. Since Apple has not and > will probably not release it copyright ownersh

Re: Abandonware???

Will we have fermented shark loin for breakfast? :-) On 2015-10-02, 3:55 PM, "webobjects-dev-bounces+chill=gevityinc@lists.apple.com on behalf of Pascal Robert" wrote: > >> Le 2015-10-02 à 18:00, Hugi Thordarson a écrit : >> >> Apple silently killed WebObjects and abandoned it's users rou

Re: Abandonware???

> Le 2015-10-02 à 18:00, Hugi Thordarson a écrit : > > Apple silently killed WebObjects and abandoned it's users roughly a decade > ago (in a somewhat less-than-honest manner (Floop-de-diddity-doo You, Apple)). > > But the community marches on. I’m constantly impressed by how this community >

Re: Abandonware???

Apple silently killed WebObjects and abandoned it's users roughly a decade ago (in a somewhat less-than-honest manner (Floop-de-diddity-doo You, Apple)). But the community marches on. I’m constantly impressed by how this community survives and keeps what's essentially a dead product the best IDE

Re: Abandonware???

IMO, yes. Fits perfectly. I think we can all agree, it isn’t Swift http://www.zdnet.com/article/swift-goes-open-source-at-apple-wwdc-2015/ :-/ On Oct 2, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Paul Yu wrote: > I was reading this Wikipedia article. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abandonware > > Would the lis

Re: NoSQL

On Thu, 01 Oct 2015 19:22:54 +0100 Gino Pacitti wrote: > Has anyone any thoughts on NoSQL and WO integrations and usage? > > It depends if you are talking about NoSQL on the server side, or are you talking about the whole "NoSQL ecosystem" that seems to have developed? I usually say that I am

Re: WOOpenURL

I think there is some safety setting on the /System/Library folder as creating folders, even as root, is not allowed… G > On 2 Oct 2015, at 22:08, John Huss wrote: > > Just run this in Terminal: > ln -s /usr/bin/open /System/Library/WebObjects/Executables/WOOpenURL > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 a

Re: WOOpenURL

Just run this in Terminal: ln -s /usr/bin/open /System/Library/WebObjects/Executables/WOOpenURL On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:41 AM Gino Pacitti wrote: > Hi Group > > Just updated to El Capitan and WOAutoOpenInBrowser not working… my console > 'Unable to locate WOOpenURL on your computer, AutoOpen

Re: Abandonware???

I think Apple has abandoned WebObjects outside of Apple but not inside. Just my personal opinion Alan > On Oct 2, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Paul Yu wrote: > > I was reading this Wikipedia article. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abandonware > > Would the list agree that WebObjects is now abandon

Re: Abandonware???

Hi D Because of > WebObjects - the set of frameworks supplied by Apple as a supported product > == Abandonware The community responded with > WebObjects - the set of frameworks used/enhanced/patched by the community > through Wonder. This was described in the wiki as possible responses of cus

Re: Abandonware???

WebObjects - the set of frameworks used by Apple == Not Abandonware WebObjects - the set of frameworks used/enhanced/patched by the community through Wonder == Not Abandonware WebObjects - the set of frameworks supplied by Apple as a supported product == Abandonware My opinion. D Paul Yu

Abandonware???

I was reading this Wikipedia article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abandonware Would the list agree that WebObjects is now abandonware? "Definitions of "abandoned" vary, but in general it is like any item that is abandoned - it is ignored by the own

Re: El Capitan

Yes! Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 2, 2015, at 11:15 AM, David LeBer wrote: > > Does WOInstaller still work? > https://wiki.wocommunity.org/display/WEB/Project+Wonder+Installation > > It allows you specify a different location for the WO frameworks than in > /Sys/Lib/Fram. > > D > > > >>

Re: El Capitan

Does WOInstaller still work? https://wiki.wocommunity.org/display/WEB/Project+Wonder+Installation It allows you specify a different location for the WO frameworks than in /Sys/Lib/Fram. D Hugi Thordarson October 2, 2015 at 7:05 AM The El-Capitan installer un-inst

Re: El Capitan

The El-Capitan installer un-installed WebObjects for me and then refused to re-install from the 5.4.3 package until I disabled System Integrity Protection (start the computer up in recovery mode, open a terminal and enter “csrutil disable”). Probably due to the Installer attempting to modify /S

Re: El Capitan

No ;) W dniu 01.10.2015 o 10:47, Mark Wardle pisze: Are there any problems with El Capitan and eclipse and webobjects? Mark ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.appl