Re: WebObjects officially declared dead by Apple

Hi Hugi, Now, why did you have to go kill WO. Couldn't you just have let it live its peaceful life in retirement :-) It's been a long time. Hope you are all well. -Cail Sent from my iPhone > On May 4, 2016, at 19:30, Hugi Thordarson wrote: > > Well, f***… Wouldn’t you

Re: WWDC (not WOWODC, the other one)

The planets seem to have aligned over my head as well. -Cail Sent from my iPhone On 08/04/2014, at 14.48, David Avendasora webobje...@avendasora.com wrote: Somehow the planets aligned and I was selected in the lottery for the opportunity to buy a WWDC ticket. Who else is planning on

Re: Rép : Re: Calling PL/SQL FUNCTION In WebObjects( FUNCTION is not a procedure or is undefined )

Hi Raymond, In general when dealing with functions from EOF you must, in addition to the arguments, define the return type in your eomodel. You define the return type by adding an attribute with the column name 0 (zero). Off the top of my head I believe the attribute name and direction have

Re: Rép : Re: Re: Calling PL/SQL FUNCTION In WebObjects( FUNCTION is not a procedure or is undefined )

to use the rawRowSQL option. Thanks Envoyé depuis iCloud Le 17 oct 2011 à 23:50, Cail Borrell c...@frontbase.com a écrit : Hi Raymond, In general when dealing with functions from EOF you must, in addition to the arguments, define the return type in your eomodel. You define the return

Fwd: FrontBasePlugIn EOQualifier.QualifierOperatorContains

Begin forwarded message: From: Cail Borrell c...@frontbase.com Date: 13. sep 2011 14.45.02 CEST To: David Avendasora webobje...@avendasora.com Cc: Cail Borrell c...@frontbase.com Subject: Re: FrontBasePlugIn EOQualifier.QualifierOperatorContains Hi David, I believe it was originally

Re: Design question: are cross database ManyToMany relationships possible

Hi Lars, Like Karl said it should pretty much just work. As long as you do not flatten such relationships and also make sure your qualifiers on either side do not include predicates from the other. In short you just need to keep in mind that EOF will generate SQL that tries to join tables

Re: [OT]FrontBase from 4. to 5.1. 2

and then the master. -Cail On Mar 15, 2010, at 12:09 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: On Mar 14, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Cail Borrell wrote: Hi Baiss, The FB4 and FB5 databases are not binary compatible. So as Chuck suggested you will need to do an export and import. Also it is not required to obtain a new license

Re: [OT]FrontBase from 4. to 5.1. 2

Hi Baiss, The FB4 and FB5 databases are not binary compatible. So as Chuck suggested you will need to do an export and import. Also it is not required to obtain a new license. You can just copy the LicenseString file from the FB4 installation. As for the transaction logs they are compatible.

Re: FrontBase 5

Hi Dennis, Yes, this is true. Best Regards Cail On Feb 1, 2010, at 9:15 PM, Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists wrote: Is it true that the electronic licenses for Version 4 are the same as those for Version 5? Thanks. With Kind Regards, Dennis Gaastra, Chief Technology Officer, WEBAPPZ® Systems,

Re: FrontBase 5

Hi Dennis, I can confirm that FB5 does support Intel 64 bit. -Cail On Jan 7, 2010, at 7:50 PM, Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists wrote: Hopefully, it will be Intel (64 bit)!!! With Kind Regards, Dennis Gaastra, On 2010-01-07, at 7:26 AM, Amedeo Mantica wrote: :-) On 07/gen/2010, at 13.55,

Re: Help me choose topics for WOWODC'09

+1 On 17/04/2009, at 19.47, David Holt wrote: On 17-Apr-09, at 10:43 AM, Chuck Hill wrote: 3. Leveraging EOF Validation and WO Components - extending EOF's validation (GVC, Wonder, Validity approaches) - dealing with an EOGeneralAdaptorException in a user friendly way - getting pages and

Re: Two directActions on one form

Hi David, It should work if you add the actionClass=DirectAction binding the form component. -Cail On 18/12/2008, at 02.34, David Holt wrote: I must be missing something basic, but I am doing simple login form with two submit buttons. I used to have the form bound to a login direct

Re: AjaxUpdateLink / Container

I experienced something like this where a subcomponent would only load once. It seemed to be caused by the binding synchronization. So adding this public boolean isStateless() { return true; } public boolean synchronizesVariablesWithBindings() { return false; } to the

Re: sequential numbering across more instances

Hi Ondra, If you change the internal data type of your unique attribute to String you should be able to use a little sql injection when inserting your record. Just set the value of your unique column to something like: coalesce (select max(unique column) from table name, cast (100 as

Fwd: sequential numbering across more instances

Ups forgot the list. Begin forwarded message: From: Cail Borrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 20. aug 2008 18.50.44 GMT+02:00 To: Ondřej Čada [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Cail Borrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: sequential numbering across more instances Hi Ondra, I believe I did leave out a few

Re: sequential numbering across more instances

. Hence no quotes ;-) -Cail On 20/08/2008, at 18.40, Chuck Hill wrote: Hi Cail, On Aug 20, 2008, at 6:47 AM, Cail Borrell wrote: Hi Ondra, If you change the internal data type of your unique attribute to String you should be able to use a little sql injection when inserting your

Re: 10.5 deployment

Hi Josh, That's a +1 from here. Same approach as Miguel but I ran the 5.3.3. update manually. -Cail On 24/06/2008, at 17.33, Miguel Arroz wrote: Hi! No problems at all... just install 5.3 on Leopard according to the Mike's procedure on

Re: using null in a fetchspec

Hi Fred, You could try using NSKeyValueCoding.NullValue instead of null. -Cail On 20/06/2008, at 00.56, Chuck Hill wrote: On Jun 19, 2008, at 3:49 PM, Fred Wells wrote: Hello all, I can't seem to find any info on this and can't get this to work. Is there a way to have null be a

Re: ALCATRAZ! (Was: [OT] WOWODC Outing)

Here's yet another wowodc newbie coming in late friday. Just discovered that the Chieftan is only two blocks form my hotel. Mind if I join the party? -Cail On 06/06/2008, at 05.23, Chuck Hill wrote: Typically, we suck at getting ourselves organized. It is almost like a WWDC tradition.

Re: Localize WOLips project

Hi TIA In addition if you are not using sessions you can get your localizer with ERXLocalizer.defaultLocalizer() and if you are using ERXComponent's you can call localizer() directly from the component Regards, Cail and if you are not using sessions On 13/04/2008, at