On 28/01/2009, at 8:02 AM, Frank Stock wrote:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: adaptorValueType: unable to load
class named 'java.lang.BigDecimal' for attribute portkosten on
entity BestelbonIn
Which one of the errors? You specifically get the
"java.lang.BigDecimal" (with a .lang and not
This is the error I get:
I did an update about 3 hours ago. I can do it again if you want me to
do that?
com.webobjects.foundation.NSForwardException for
com.webobjects.foundation.NSForwardException for
java.lang.IllegalStateException: adaptorValueType: unable to load
class named 'java.lang.
I've just upgraded to the nightly build and latest Wonder and i get
the same error. Do you have a solution for that?
Which one of the errors? You specifically get the
"java.lang.BigDecimal" (with a .lang and not a .math)? And you're
using the absolute latest nightly or the nightly from a co
Hi Henrique and Mike,
I've just upgraded to the nightly build and latest Wonder and i get
the same error. Do you have a solution for that?
Thanks
Frank Stock
Op 22-jan-09, om 21:45 heeft Henrique Prange het volgende geschreven:
Hi Mike,
It seems that WOL-936 broke my models. :(
I get the
The devil is in the details. I just read BigDecimal without focusing
on the package.
you and me both, since I caused your problem in the first place ...
ms
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list
Hi Mike,
The devil is in the details. I just read BigDecimal without focusing on
the package.
Thanks again and +1 for the stable release.
Cheers,
Henrique
Mike Schrag wrote:
"java.lang.IllegalStateException: adaptorValueType: unable to load
class named 'java.lang.BigDecimal' for attribute
"java.lang.IllegalStateException: adaptorValueType: unable to load
class named 'java.lang.BigDecimal' for attribute balance on entity
Account"
So it looks like you're using the "build before I fixed that"
build ... BigDecimal is in java.math, not java.lang. Alan Zebchuck
caught that a little
Hi Mike,
It seems that WOL-936 broke my models. :(
I get the following message when opening most of my models:
"Removed redundant 'classname' attribute."
I confirm the message and save the model. After that, I get the
following error when running the application:
"java.lang.IllegalStateExcepti
WOL-950, just created.
F
On Jan 21, 2009, at 13:36, Mike Schrag wrote:
If there are any bugs you consider total showstoppers for the new
stable release of WOL, please comment on them in the WOLips Jira.
Clock is ticking :)
ms
___
Do not post
901 fixed, 879 maybe fixed? I can't reproduce it.
On Jan 22, 2009, at 12:08 AM, Alan Zebchuk wrote:
Any chance to get WOL-901 and WOL-879 fixed?
Alan
On 21-Jan-09, at 8:36 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
If there are any bugs you consider total showstoppers for the new
stable release of WOL,
Any chance to get WOL-901 and WOL-879 fixed?
Alan
On 21-Jan-09, at 8:36 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
If there are any bugs you consider total showstoppers for the new
stable release of WOL, please comment on them in the WOLips Jira.
Clock is ticking :)
ms
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cry
Hi Mike et al,
Thank you for all your work on WOLips and all your other contributions
to our WO community.
Upgrading instructions from stable WOLips 3.3 to 3.4: There have been
several posts for upgrading to "unstable" on the list and web. What is
the most up-to-date set of instructions,
Hi,
I am trying to call a function with a return value defined in an
Oracle database. I found legacy EOF notes indicating that it was
possible to do so by adding an argument named "returnValue" to the EO
stored procedure, but this results in the following exception:
[exec] PLS-00306: w
http://webobjects.mdimension.com/wolips/releases/
On Jan 21, 2009, at 1:01 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:
Mike,
What's the right way to access the old release after nightly becomes
stable?
Ken
On Jan 21, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
Yes and we preserve previous stable releases, so you c
Mike,
What's the right way to access the old release after nightly becomes
stable?
Ken
On Jan 21, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
Yes and we preserve previous stable releases, so you can always
continue to install the old one.
On Jan 21, 2009, at 12:42 PM, David Holt wrote:
Hi M
Yes and we preserve previous stable releases, so you can always
continue to install the old one.
On Jan 21, 2009, at 12:42 PM, David Holt wrote:
Hi Mike,
Just to confirm, stable is still for 3.3 as of this email? (I would
like to upgrade to the latest possible stable for Eclipse 3.3 before
Hi Mike,
Just to confirm, stable is still for 3.3 as of this email? (I would
like to upgrade to the latest possible stable for Eclipse 3.3 before
it gets taken to 3.4).
David
On 21-Jan-09, at 9:36 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
If there are any bugs you consider total showstoppers for the new
If there are any bugs you consider total showstoppers for the new
stable release of WOL, please comment on them in the WOLips Jira.
Clock is ticking :)
ms
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing lis
18 matches
Mail list logo
