[webstack-discuss] has anyone looked at the new Web Stack package names in snv_133?

>> >> web/server/apache-22/plugin/apache-php5 >> >> OR >> >> web/server/apache-22/plugin/apache-php52 > This makes more sense to me. >> >> Note that the mod_php5.so is delivered as a link to mod_php5.2.so >> although the conf file is php5.2.conf. If we ever needed to support >> two PHP re

[webstack-discuss] optional php extns as separate packages

Jyri Virkki wrote: > Sriram Natarajan wrote: > >> Hi >> To simplify development / deployment with php in opensolaris, we >> deliver various additional extensions like suhosin, tcpwrap, idn, xdebug >> etc within our PHP package (SUNWphp52u) . However, they are not enabled >> by default. User

[webstack-discuss] webrev needed for upgrading memcached 1.2.5 to 1.4.1

Trond Norbye wrote: > See: > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~trond/webrev/ From the peanut gallery It generally looks good. I like the change to the default user of noaccess. Having said that, I'd highly recommend adding some default options, say "-L -m 64". Why? On popular Linux distros t

[webstack-discuss] conf.d and lighttpd

Hi Amanda, Amanda Waite wrote: > Hi Matt, > > See: http://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/1221 Thanks for the pointer. The idea of using cat had come up, but obviously the lighttpd.conf shipped with Web Stack would have to do that. It feels wrong for me to squash the built in lighttpd.conf with th

[webstack-discuss] conf.d and lighttpd

Hi all, If I'm shipping some software which depends on lighttpd in OpenSolaris, and I need to modify the configuration, there isn't a good way to drop a file in which will augment the existing configuration, is there? I poked through the docs which don't really mention the conf.d delivered by

[webstack-discuss] Regd: SUNWmemcached on opensolaris

Eric wrote: > Hi, > > In the getting started guide, it explain ho to start memcached > > http://wikis.sun.com/display/WebStack/Web+Stack+Getting+Started+Guide#WebStackGettingStartedGuide-DistributedCachingwith{{memcached}} > > ... > > In OpenSolaris 2009.06, execute the following command: > > # svc

[webstack-discuss] MySQL Configuration File Expected Behavior

Jyri Virkki wrote: > Matt Ingenthron wrote: > > > I don't think everyone is talking about the same thing, which is > understandable since this is the OpenSolaris Web Stack list but the > original question wasn't about OpenSolaris at all... > Yep, which is

[webstack-discuss] MySQL Configuration File Expected Behavior

Sriram Natarajan wrote: > In Linux, the convention to read configuration files are from > /etc/. > For example, PHP configuration files are read from /etc/php.ini. > Similarly , for Apache, configuration files are at /etc/httpd.conf > and MySQL configuration file at /etc/my.cnf > > In OpenSola

[webstack-discuss] MySQL Configuration File Expected Behavior

Brian Overstreet wrote: > Should the Webstack MySQL look at /etc/my.cnf location in addition to the > default Webstack location? > > Currently, MySQL will look in /etc for configuration in addition to the > default > Webstack location of /etc/opt/... > Since this is pretty well-known and w

[webstack-discuss] Plan for MySQL 5.1.3x builds

Martin MC Brown wrote: > >> >> >> Looking there, it appears one difference is no direct access to the >> THD structure. In the past, I'd found many of the things I wanted to >> do needed to follow this around MySQL. Is the intent with the >> connectionid and query to be able to follow this aro

[webstack-discuss] Plan for MySQL 5.1.3x builds

Hi Martin, Martin MC Brown wrote: > Hi Matt, > >>> >>> 5.1.30 is going into OpenSolaris as I type. Later 5.1 releases will >>> come as resources allow and criticality necessitates. >> >> Thanks Lars! One related question... any chances we have our delta >> patches from Cool Stack which had a My

[webstack-discuss] Plan for MySQL 5.1.3x builds

Lars Heill wrote: > > 5.1.30 is going into OpenSolaris as I type. Later 5.1 releases will > come as resources allow and criticality necessitates. Thanks Lars! One related question... any chances we have our delta patches from Cool Stack which had a MySQL DTrace provider in this putback? Or fo

[webstack-discuss] Apache and APR-Util Using OpenLDAP [LSARC/2009/123]

Jyri Virkki wrote: > James Carlson wrote: > >>> To keep some perspective, what Sun calls volatile sand is what all of >>> these 3rd party applications build their ldap support on and their sky >>> isn't falling from what I'm told. >>> >> In that case, "Volatile" might not be the right cla

[webstack-discuss] [sfwnv-discuss] Code review for Lighttpd 1.4.21 update

Jyri Virkki wrote: > Matt Ingenthron wrote: > >> I figured that, but what "works" and what is designed to work with the >> client/server of different versions is what I wasn't sure about. >> > > It needs to go with the formally documented-to-wo

[webstack-discuss] [sfwnv-discuss] Code review for Lighttpd 1.4.21 update

Sriram Natarajan wrote: > > > Matt Ingenthron wrote: >> Sriram Natarajan wrote: >>> >>> >>> - MySQL 5.1 splits its database and clients libraries separately. >>> So, once MySQL 5.1 is integrated , you might want to depend on >>> SUNWmy

[webstack-discuss] [sfwnv-discuss] Code review for Lighttpd 1.4.21 update

Sriram Natarajan wrote: > > > - MySQL 5.1 splits its database and clients libraries separately. So, > once MySQL 5.1 is integrated , you might want to depend on > SUNWmysql51lib rather than depending on SUNWmysql5u as is the case > right now. right now, it looks like one will need to install a

[webstack-discuss] MySQL 5.0.77 for OpenSolaris / Solaris 10

Sriram Natarajan wrote: > > > Lars Heill wrote: >> Sriram Natarajan wrote: >>> Hi >>> Are we going to integrate latest MySQL release - MySQL 5.0.77 within >>> OpenSolaris / Solaris 10 (as part of Web Stack 1.5) ? >> >> 5.1.30 is targeted for b110, no plans for 5.0.77. > Will 1.5 customer not wonde

[webstack-discuss] I didn't see Mysql 5.1 under http://pkg.opensolaris.org/webstack ?

But to Rudolf's question, it used to be on the webstack repository. What happened to it? Jyri: do you know? - Matt Brian Overstreet wrote: > Currently, the Sun Web Stack 1.4 ships with MySQL 5.0.67. The next version > will include 5.1. > > --Brian > > On Friday 13 February 2009 04:25:06 Rudo

[webstack-discuss] phpmyadmin package

Hi Robert, Robert Bauer wrote: > I just tried to install it myself by downloading it at sourceforge.net > directly. > mcrypt is missing. PHP 5.2 needs to be recompiled with mcrypt support, or it > would not be possible to use PhpMyAdmin. > I know it can be installed and used in most cases w

[webstack-discuss] plans/status on libmcrypt

Hi Dina/Darren, For the Web Stack project (I've cc'd the OpenSolaris project list), we'd like to include the PHP extensions for mcrypt, which of course depends on libmcrypt. I know you've submitted an ARC case which was subsequently approved. The RFE for integration, bugster #6663254, doesn't

[webstack-discuss] [indiana-discuss] Any plan to add mysql-64bit to the repository?

Hi Nico, I've cc'd webstack-discuss, as that's the project which does the integration of components like MySQL into OpenSolaris. It's probably best to discuss this there. More below... Nico Sabbi wrote: > On Tuesday 13 January 2009 11:28:54 Nico Sabbi wrote: > >> As for $subject: I can't i

[webstack-discuss] [Fwd: Re: [pkg-discuss] Mako Template Sample]

FYI for those following Python web related stuff coming from the OpenSolaris pkg folks... -- next part -- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Shawn Walker Subject: Re: [pkg-discuss] Mako Template Sample Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:26:01 -0600 Size: 6491 URL:

[webstack-discuss] crosspost: [Fwd: [pkg-discuss] Updated pkg.opensolaris.org repository URLs]

Note the changes to how OpenSolaris 2008.11 will be delivered from a package perspective... - Matt -- next part -- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Stephen Hahn Subject: [pkg-discuss] Updated pkg.opensolaris.org repository URLs Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:15:30 -07

[webstack-discuss] Should we not have a mpm specific tuning within our /etc/apache2/2.2/conf.d directory

Hi Sriram, There was discussion of this at one point, quite a while back. We didn't do anything though Sriram Natarajan wrote: > Hi > I have couple of questions on my apache default configuration that we > integrate within opensolaris and it was brought to my attention that I > raise this i

[webstack-discuss] Should we not have a mpm specific tuning within our /etc/apache2/2.2/conf.d directory

Hi Sriram, There was discussion of this at one point, quite a while back. We didn't do anything though Sriram Natarajan wrote: > Hi > I have couple of questions on my apache default configuration that we > integrate within opensolaris and it was brought to my attention that I > raise this i

[webstack-discuss] Should we not have a mpm specific tuning within our /etc/apache2/2.2/conf.d directory

Hi Sriram, There was discussion of this at one point, quite a while back. We didn't do anything though Sriram Natarajan wrote: > Hi > I have couple of questions on my apache default configuration that we > integrate within opensolaris and it was brought to my attention that I > raise this i

[webstack-discuss] MySQL package granularity

Hi Jyri, Jyri Virkki wrote: > I've been playing with phpmyadmin package again a bit and one > unfortunate detail is that it's not possible to install it without > installing all of MySQL5 on localhost, even if one wanted to use it > to administer a remote MySQL instance. > > That's because phpMyA

[webstack-discuss] ruby-debug-ide on OpenSolaris 2008.05

Jyri Virkki wrote: > > IIRC with the latest fixes gcc is a dependency, so installing gem > should silently ensure gcc is there so everything should just work > (it's not the bad old pre-IPS days anymore, where a missing dependency > meant you had to go hunting on the web to try to manually find and

[webstack-discuss] ruby-debug-ide on OpenSolaris 2008.05

For Brian's problem, Prashant addressed this recently in his blog: http://blogs.sun.com/prashant/entry/dtrace_support1 Most of the fixes are in build 89, with one little fix to come about in build 90. Those who need a workaround for running on earlier builds (like Brian) can grab it from the bl

[webstack-discuss] phppgadmin integration into Nevada

Bjorn Munch wrote: > On 22/05 17.36, Thava Alagu wrote: > >> (snip...) >> I think having this dependency makes the life easier in most >>common situations. >>Though, this can in principle, be used with any PHP capable webserver, >>it is better >>to point to specific

[webstack-discuss] experimental repo question

ity" does correctly list the added webstack authority. I did a refresh. Has varnish gone missing? I'm at a loss for how to debug this. - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Global Systems Practice http://blogs.sun.com/mingenth

[webstack-discuss] [sfwnv-discuss] resend: need Code Review for Lighttpd 1.4 integration

tunately, I think we'll need a branding package for every component which may have separate branding and is not dependent on something else branded. The only other option is to deliver a component which will generate errors when run out of the box. - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrast

[webstack-discuss] [Fwd: [pkg-discuss] Package namespace]

know Jyri has followed this and thought about it some. Are there any specific things we'll need to be able to roll forward say the MySQL package, or handle a shared dpendency like curl? There's nothing I can think of at the moment, but now is the time to think it through and ask abou

[webstack-discuss] [databases-discuss] Review request - MySQL 64bit and Connectors ARC case

t;> 64-bit builds), but managed to get together some good results which I >> summarized here: http://coalface.mcslp.com/?p=68 >> >> The upshot? >> >> Basically on x86 there seems to be a significant advantage of >> enabling 64-bit builds over 32-bit. On SPARC,

[webstack-discuss] Review request - MySQL 64bit and Connectors ARC case

on x64 based systems. Before this arc case goes forward adopting "enable_64bit", I thought this was worth bring up on the list to discuss. Is there any case here where isaexec makes sense? I believe we'll need to deliver both, and there are probably still a number of reason

[webstack-discuss] [Fwd: Re: [dtrace-discuss] DTrace for MySQL?]

FYI to folks on this list, MySQL/DTrace integration has been discussed over on the DTrace OpenSOlaris list. - Matt -- next part -- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Luojia Chen Subject: Re: [dtrace-discuss] DTrace for MySQL? Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:36:57 -0800 S

[webstack-discuss] FWD: [dtrace-discuss] DTrace in Perl: What probes should we have?

We should figure out how we address this (if needed by this team) on our roadmap. -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Global Systems Practice http://blogs.sun.com/mingenthron/ email: matt.ingenthron at sun.com Phone: 310-242-6439

[webstack-discuss] Can we get a Mercurial repository for Memcached on opensolaris.org?

been taken upstream yet. Is the flow like the following? Sun incubator of changes -> memcache -> sfwnv Jyri's had some thoughts and discussions with the Solaris folks on repository/pkging modernization. Jyri, what do think the right approach is here? - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron

[webstack-discuss] NetBeans Ruby with webstack native ruby in Solaris b79 not working OOTB

s Express builds. I suspect recent S10 does as well (since NB6 may be targeting more than Web Stack does at the moment). - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Global Systems Practice http://blogs.sun.com/mingenthron/ email: matt.ingenthron at sun.com Phone: 310-242-6439

[webstack-discuss] mysql user

> > P.S. is there a way for me to install and test the web stack stuff > prior to build 79? Yes, but it's using a package repository on SWAN at the moment (unfortunately-- we have to go through process to release things). Ludo's already documented this here: http://wikis.sun.com/display/WebS

[webstack-discuss] SXDE delivery for 32 bits platform

eded to follow the problem ? > It looks like it. Thanks for catching this. There category/subcategories are listed on the opensolaris.org/os/project/webstack pages if you come across anything else. I've just filed 6635274. Thanks again, - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure So

[webstack-discuss] Apache External Modules ARC (DRAFT)

cked-nits with blastwave.org. I really like the work they've done over there, and I support them (though Phil Brown and I may not agree on the pkg stuff), but they too suffer from some of the package dependency issues. For instance, if you get Apache, it usually pulls down OpenLDAP, which

[webstack-discuss] Additional PHP extensions for SXDE

r two: > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~jyri/php_extensions/ > I like 'em, even an alphabetized package prototype... :) -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Global Systems Practice http://blogs.sun.com/mingenthron/ email: matt.ingenthron at sun.com Phone: 310-242-6439

[webstack-discuss] memcache component for SXDE (was Re: Additional PHP extensions for SXDE)

Sriram Natarajan wrote: > Hi > Does any one in this alias has any update on when 'memcached' > component is going to be integrated within SXDE. I would like to > evaluate Memcached support within PHP and for this I need Memcached > packages . Last I heard, there was a discussion on the propose

[webstack-discuss] lighttpd Giving Solaris some love

The subject line is straight from the title on the blog: Posted on 10/28: http://www.lighttpd.net/2007/10/28/giving-solaris-some-love -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Global Systems Practice http://blogs.sun.com/mingenthron/ email

[webstack-discuss] Additional PHP extensions for SXDE

. If you agree, we can create a page there and I can set it up so you can edit it. I think you're referring to PDO, not just ODBC, correct? I've occasionally referred to this site: http://www.connectionstrings.com/ - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architec

[webstack-discuss] Including MySQL 5.0 with Solaris [LSARC/2007/608 FastTrack timeout 10/26/2007]

Danek Duvall wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 10:45:23PM -0700, Matt Ingenthron wrote: > > >> I'd be a bit concerned about this, as I recall PHP mysql modules use the >> static client libraries when it builds by default. A quick search or two >> seems

[webstack-discuss] Including MySQL 5.0 with Solaris [LSARC/2007/608 FastTrack timeout 10/26/2007]

s exist in typical MySQL install area: >> libdbug.a, libmysys.a , libmystrings.a , libz.a. (in addition to >> client static library). >> I am working with MySQL to get a definitive answer about their use case ... >> > > Ok let us know.. > -- Matt Ingen

[webstack-discuss] [webstack-notify] apache2 and php5 Source packages doesn't need to dependent on runtime sources.

pkgdata/src_apache2/Pkginfo > pkgdata/src_php5/Pkginfo Regards, - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Global Systems Practice http://blogs.sun.com/mingenthron/ email: matt.ingenthron at sun.com Phone: 310-242-6439

[webstack-discuss] common applications for your web stack

e any frameworks you consider to be very important? i.e., CakePHP, etc? If you can give us an idea, it would help us prioritize the type of testing we do for future releases. Thanks in advance! - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. - G

[webstack-discuss] DTrace toolkit, now with Web Stack related stuff

Hi all, Have a look at this posting: http://bdgregg.blogspot.com/2007/10/dtracetoolkit-ver-099.html This should fit in nicely when we release things! Need to integrate it with the develper experience too. - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Microsystems

[webstack-discuss] Database: 32 vs 64 bit

tely from the server in MySQL. - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Global Systems Practice http://blogs.sun.com/mingenthron/ email: matt.ingenthron at sun.com Phone: 310-242-6439

[webstack-discuss] Versioning/Name for Ruby/Rails package.

From my perspective, we need to both include common gems and somehow support using the regular network repository gem install. In conversation, I've also heard Jason Hoffman of Joyent agree with Brandon on the idea that the preferred way to install things like rails is as a gem, so

[webstack-discuss] Ruby/Rails components -

we've not really laid specific plans for after build 79. Thanks for the feedback though, and it's good to start thinking about it. - Matt [1] http://opensolaris.org/os/community/on/onnv_schedule.txt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Microsys

[webstack-discuss] Ruby/Rails components -

ighttpd/nginx (either a Sun engineer or a community member), that would be great in my opinion. - Matt [1] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/entry/pkg_1_a_no_scripting#comments [2] http://blogs.sun.com/shanti/entry/lighttpd_on_solaris -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Micr

[webstack-discuss] question/thoughts on paths

end upon them in other parts of WOS. Any thoughts? - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Global Systems Practice http://blogs.sun.com/mingenthron/ email: matt.ingenthron at sun.com Phone: 310-242-6439

[webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache discussions so far

ght? We need to be approachable though, so we need to make sure whatever layout we end up with is not confusing (personally, I'd argue /usr/apache and /usr/apache2 is confusing, though that's what we have) and, probably more importantly, makes it easy for the end user to start-up a working stack to either develop upon or run a common app upon. Hope that helps, - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Global Systems Practice http://blogs.sun.com/mingenthron/ email: matt.ingenthron at sun.com Phone: 310-242-6439

[webstack-discuss] crosspost: Re: [dtrace-discuss] A ustack helper for perl

Hi all, If all goes the way Alan hopes it will, Solaris and the Perl used for Web Stack would have DTrace probes in it. I just thought this may be of interest to people on this list. - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Global Systems

[webstack-discuss] source packages in Indiana (was Re: [indiana-discuss] "Where do I download OpenSolaris" Ian Murdock)

back in May of last year-- a lot more time and effort has gone into it in the last 90 days or so. One of the things I've been trying to do is get the word out a little further-- where did you come across the project? Thanks, - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solution

[webstack-discuss] source packages in Indiana (was Re: [indiana-discuss] "Where do I download OpenSolaris" Ian Murdock)

ill do fairly well with it, but we could do better with one of the other light approaches. Even though we may not be able to get it in to a package soon, we should document building nginx and lighttpd on Solaris. - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Micro

[webstack-discuss] source packages in Indiana (was Re: [indiana-discuss] "Where do I download OpenSolaris" Ian Murdock)

> a longstanding problem for years - these days I expect that it ought > to be getting fixed We have that in Cool Stack already and the current plan is to get the Web Stack components in sfwnv up to feature parity with what's in Cool Stack, so it will be fixed soon. You can see

[webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache discussions so far (take 2)

(in part because we haven't asked) how/when they change compatibility across releases or even patches, so the versioned layout may require x.y or x.y.z or even x.y.z-a. - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Global Systems Practice http://blogs.sun.com/mingenthron/ email: matt.ingenthron at sun.com Phone: 310-242-6439

[webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache discussions so far (take 2)

> The engineering discussion here is whether the layout should permit > that, keeping in mind complexity isn't free. > > Agreed, and sorry for the continued divergence. :) -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Global Sy

[webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache discussions so far

Jyri Virkki wrote: > Matt Ingenthron wrote: > >> While we want Solaris features, such as SMF, to be available and >> advocated, one of the challenges with current Solaris for people who may >> consider migrating is the fact that things are so different than most &g

[webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache discussions so far (take 2)

king of is state a "minimum" of xx months. The actual support lifecycle to be determined based on both demand from customers and what's feasible with respect to keeping in synch with the upstream. That would allow people to plan accordingly, and keep it sane for us. Matt -- Matt Ingen

[webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache discussions so far

is set to /usr/apache2/libexec (at least with the package currently in SFWNV). So, perhaps the build directory (which seems to have things for building software, but not built software) needs to be in /usr but there should be a libexec which apxs should know how to use in /var/apache2/lib

[webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache discussions so far (take 2)

o what ISVs do with Solaris in a way-- they still support Solaris 8 because they have customer demand for it-- we may need to support Apache 1.3 for a long time due to demand-- not because either we or apache think it's the best approach -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure S

[webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache discussions so far

event, there should be a README.apachectl or something fairly obvious right there in the directory to tell people what's going on with this modified apache. - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Global Systems Practice http://blogs.sun.com/mingenthron/ email: matt.ingenthron at sun.com Phone: 310-242-6439

[webstack-discuss] files page on project site

laris 10 and Solaris Express (any edition) is Cool Stack? Regards, - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Global Systems Practice http://blogs.sun.com/mingenthron/ email: matt.ingenthron at sun.com Phone: 310-242-6439

[webstack-discuss] PHP: comparing Cool Stack vs. PSARC/2007/168

BC v3 (IBM DB2, unixODBC and win32 O.. X > pdo_pgsql [PostgreSQL] X > pspell [Pspell Functions] X > readline [GNU Readline] X > snmp [SNMP Functions] X > xsl [XSL functions]

[webstack-discuss] Documentation for webstack

ys different." >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> webstack-discuss mailing list >> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss >>

[webstack-discuss] PROPOSAL - Source code organisation and build system changes

kefile?r2=2522&r1=0 I think it would be good for the upstream communities to be able to see the source as it had started there, and Sun's modifications (if any) easily through a web based tool. Does this make sense? - Matt -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect

[webstack-discuss] hello

Hi jpd, Just to add one thing on to what Shanti said On the packaging of multiple versions, that's been discussed over in the sfwnv-discuss community. This project isn't part of Nevada (a.k.a. Solaris Express) necessarily, but we'd like to be a source for stuff that goes into Nevada. Why

[webstack-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] Annoucing the Web Stack Project

inded explanation, - Matt [1] http://blogs.sun.com/alanbur/date/20050909 -- Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Global Systems Practice http://blogs.sun.com/mingenthron/ email: matt.ingenthron at sun.com Phone: 310-242-6439