On 01/08/2003 11:08:47 PM Ian Bicking wrote:
>On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 22:00, Edmund Lian wrote:
>> >I never really have supported or wanted mutable forms -- people just
>> >happened to find them on their own since I left the code in. There
>> >would be no mutable forms. I don't believe there is a
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 19:30, Stuart Donaldson wrote:
> Regarding patch 630505
>
>
>http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=630505&group_id=4866&atid=304866
>
> This catches the case where an error occurs during encoding while saving
> the session to a file. The patch to Ses
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 21:53, Stuart Donaldson wrote:
> In particular, bug 636699 "include URL and paths" This was posted
> anonymously, on November 11th, and last week I added a followup question
> as I am trying to understand the problem better. However I have no idea
> who the poster of the
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 22:00, Edmund Lian wrote:
> >I never really have supported or wanted mutable forms -- people just
> >happened to find them on their own since I left the code in. There
> >would be no mutable forms. I don't believe there is any need for them.
>
> Yes there is!!! I'm using th
On 01/08/2003 10:42:09 PM Ian Bicking wrote:
>I never really have supported or wanted mutable forms -- people just
>happened to find them on their own since I left the code in. There
>would be no mutable forms. I don't believe there is any need for them.
Yes there is!!! I'm using them right no
Bugs item #635967, was opened at 2002-11-09 11:50
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104866&aid=635967&group_id=4866
Category: WebKit
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dan Parisien (mathematician)
Assigned to: Stuart
It would be very helpful when people submit bugs or patches if they did
not do so anonymously.
Please either register a sourceforge account, or put some identifying
information in the description so a developer can come back and ask
followup questions.
In particular, bug 636699 "include URL
Bugs item #635967, was opened at 2002-11-09 09:50
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104866&aid=635967&group_id=4866
Category: WebKit
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dan Parisien (mathematician)
>Assigned to: Stuart D
Bugs item #621494, was opened at 2002-10-10 11:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104866&aid=621494&group_id=4866
Category: PSP
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
>Assigned to: Stuart Donalds
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 21:25, Edmund Lian wrote:
> >Part of the advantage of a class definition is that it's a declarative
> >style people are used too -- as it is now you might almost imagine it's
> >imperative, but it's not, and I imagine that disconnect frustrates
> >people.
>
> It never bothere
On 01/08/2003 09:19:34 PM Ian wrote:
>This looks similar to FormKit
Yes, it does. I just looked at FormKit, and the servlet-level interface is
very similar to my own (now abandoned) form system. What I've found is that
the current (FFK 0.4) servlet interface is much simpler than FormKit (or
mine
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 19:35, Edmund Lian wrote:
> Before I abandoned my design, I had something much simpler:
>
> class MyForm(Form):
> def createForm(self):
> self.addField(TextField("myTextField", ...))
> self.addField(IntegerField("myIntField", ...))
> self.addButton
On 01/08/2003 04:54:48 PM Ian wrote:
>I'm using bogofilter -- it's statistical (Bayesian). It was working
>great, but it's gotten overzealous with training. Sadly, a big reason I
>wanted to use it was because I hoped it wouldn't have as many false
>positives.
I guess it isn't working too well.
Regarding patch 630505
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=630505&group_id=4866&atid=304866
This catches the case where an error occurs during encoding while saving
the session to a file. The patch to SessionFileStore.py safely handles
the exception and does not save a c
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 14:52, Edmund Lian wrote:
> Aha! That explains things... I actually did email you a couple of times,
> but never got any replies. What are you using that's giving so much
> trouble? I just use a combination of a few RBLs and SpamAssassin, and have
> had great results.
I'm usi
On 01/08/2003 03:05:08 PM Ian Bicking wrote:
>On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 11:39, Edmund Lian wrote:
>> I just did a CVS update on Webware and I see that the patch to add the
>> delCookie() method to HTTPResponse was accepted. However, I think the
patch
>> to add a delete() method to Cookie.py got overl
On 01/08/2003 02:31:33 PM Ian Bicking wrote:
>> Wierd--I emailed you 12/29 to tell you that the notification didn't seem
to
>> be working, and that there were patches waiting. You must be filtering
out
>> my email! :-)
>
>Not impossible... I've been using a trainable spam filter, and getting
>an
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 11:39, Edmund Lian wrote:
> I just did a CVS update on Webware and I see that the patch to add the
> delCookie() method to HTTPResponse was accepted. However, I think the patch
> to add a delete() method to Cookie.py got overlooked. The delCookie() patch
> depends on the delet
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 10:07, Edmund Lian wrote:
> On 01/08/2003 02:57:52 AM Ian Bicking wrote:
>
> >Damn, I didn't even know they were there. I think I got it changed so
> >it'll notify me now.
>
> Wierd--I emailed you 12/29 to tell you that the notification didn't seem to
> be working, and that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> The PSP compiler at compile time has no way to know whether you're
> specifying a module or class, so it generates code that dynamically checks
> at import time.
A okay. That makes since.
Curious question... PSP currently does not currently all
Geoffrey Talvola wrote:
> I don't think this patch will work properly if the
> inheritance is more than one level deep. It needs to be a
> depth-first search through the inheritance hierarchy, or
> something like that. Did you test that?
Oops, never mind. It will work properly -- I was confu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I don't think this patch will work properly if the inheritance is more than
> one level deep. It needs to be a depth-first search through the
> inheritance hierarchy, or something like that. Did you test that?
Uh... I dont see why it WOULDN'T work
Ian or Stuart,
I just did a CVS update on Webware and I see that the patch to add the
delCookie() method to HTTPResponse was accepted. However, I think the patch
to add a delete() method to Cookie.py got overlooked. The delCookie() patch
depends on the delete() patch.
The alternative to adding th
On 01/08/2003 02:57:52 AM Ian Bicking wrote:
>Damn, I didn't even know they were there. I think I got it changed so
>it'll notify me now.
Wierd--I emailed you 12/29 to tell you that the notification didn't seem to
be working, and that there were patches waiting. You must be filtering out
my ema
I don't think this patch will work properly if the inheritance is more than
one level deep. It needs to be a depth-first search through the inheritance
hierarchy, or something like that. Did you test that?
What is the purpose of initPSP() anyhow? It's always empty. Why can't we
just remove it?
25 matches
Mail list logo
