[weewx-user] Re: WDC skin date format

2023-08-17 Thread Greg from Oz
Yes that fixed it. https://weather.ubeaut.work/wdc/month-2022-08.html Thanks. On Friday, 18 August 2023 at 09:57:42 UTC+10 David Bätge wrote: > Hi Greg, > > you are referring to the heading on the month page "/month.html" and the > month-archive pages, eg "/month-2021-07.html", right? > > These

[weewx-user] Re: WDC skin date format

2023-08-17 Thread David Bätge
Hi Greg, you are referring to the heading on the month page "/month.html" and the month-archive pages, eg "/month-2021-07.html", right? These Headings at the top of the page use the same format, both use the setting defined in skin.conf [Units][[TimeFormats]]month (see

[weewx-user] Re: View specific date, or range

2020-02-01 Thread vince
On Saturday, February 1, 2020 at 1:37:56 PM UTC-8, comatose1978 wrote: > > I'd like to view a specific date of data, or even a range, with graphs. > I am not aware of a way to do that with vanilla weewx. You can get that effect perhaps with the highcharts stuff in the Belchertown skin, but

Re: [weewx-user] Re: On this date

2019-05-28 Thread Robin
> Peter, Thank you. This has finally started to sink in, I am now producing tables that show what I want and make sense! Thank you to everyone that has had input here, you are all superstars. Regards to all Robin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [weewx-user] Re: On this date

2019-05-27 Thread p q
Pretty simple. I've been meaning to do that for myself by hadn't gotten around to it yet. You need a if statement just inside the loop like #if $day.dateTime.format("%Y")<>$year.dateTime.format("%Y") This compares the year returned by the loop to the current year, formatted the same. If they are

[weewx-user] Re: On this date

2019-05-27 Thread Robin
> > > Gary, Thank you for the search list extension. It is very useful. I'm sorry to be a pest, I have one more question. I have been trying to see if I can exclude the current year so that I get only historic records. I have looked at the code to try and understand how it all works, but

[weewx-user] Re: On this date

2019-05-18 Thread p q
Oh wait. I it's outputting "0.0 in" I do need to do .raw, but as $day.rain.sum.raw >0 Thank you. That was it. On Saturday, May 11, 2019 at 6:30:47 AM UTC-7, Robin wrote: > > I apologise if this has been asked before or if there is a simple and > obvious way to do this, but I can't see it. > > I

[weewx-user] Re: On this date

2019-05-18 Thread p q
Nope. I get a KeyError when I switch to $day.rain.raw. No errors with $day.rain.sum. I tried $day.rain.sum >0 $day.rain.sum >0.0 $day.rain.sum >0.00 $day.rain.sum Same deal. Is there a string/real conversion problem? Can I force it to a number? On Saturday, May 18, 2019 at 10:21:22 AM UTC-7,

[weewx-user] Re: On this date

2019-05-18 Thread Andrew Milner
wouldnt it just be day.rain.raw > 0 ??? On Saturday, 18 May 2019 20:15:15 UTC+3, p q wrote: > > This is great. I implemented it on my site this morning. I added it to the > bottom of the Since Midnight table at the bottom. Does exactly what I was > looking for. > > The only issue I'm having is

[weewx-user] Re: On this date

2019-05-18 Thread p q
This is great. I implemented it on my site this morning. I added it to the bottom of the Since Midnight table at the bottom. Does exactly what I was looking for. The only issue I'm having is that I want to display the rain total only if it's not zero. I live in an area where there's typically

[weewx-user] Re: On this date

2019-05-15 Thread V. Kelly Bellis
Thanks for doing this Gary. I'm too new to all of this stuff to have anything to look back on, but it's very cool to see what can be done with weewx. - Kelly On Tuesday, May 14, 2019 at 8:37:55 PM UTC-4, gjr80 wrote: > > I should have given this a little more thought before publishing. I have

[weewx-user] Re: On this date

2019-05-14 Thread gjr80
I should have given this a little more thought before publishing. I have since made a slight change to the tag name to make it a little more logical and consistent with the other iterative tags that WeeWX supports (and to remove a 'this'). The tag now uses .periods in lieu of .this; for

Re: [weewx-user] Re: On this date

2019-05-13 Thread p q
Thank you. I was starting to look at SLE as a way to do this but I didn't get very far yesterday. I'll give this a try too. On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:56 AM Robin wrote: > Gary, > > Thank you, you are a star. That is exactly what I was looking for. > > I'm going to go away and play. I'm so

[weewx-user] Re: On this date

2019-05-13 Thread Robin
Gary, Thank you, you are a star. That is exactly what I was looking for. I'm going to go away and play. I'm so excited! Robin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

[weewx-user] Re: On this date

2019-05-13 Thread Robin
Gary, Thank you, you are a star. That is exactly what I was looking for. I'm going to go away and play. I'm so excited! Robin On Monday, 13 May 2019 10:40:37 UTC+3, gjr80 wrote: > > I've put together a search list extension that should do what you want. > You will find the code here >

[weewx-user] Re: On this date

2019-05-13 Thread gjr80
I've put together a search list extension that should do what you want. You will find the code here . The SLE is based on the existing WeeWX tag machinery that enables iteration

[weewx-user] Re: On this date

2019-05-11 Thread jose riaño
amigo creería que eso es ya tratamientos de los registros en que los estas mostrando en un servidor web o en que ?? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

[weewx-user] Re: On this date

2019-05-11 Thread p q
I want to do the same. I asked a couple of weeks ago and got no reply. I'm going to figure it out when I have time. When I do I'll post it here. On Saturday, May 11, 2019 at 6:30:47 AM UTC-7, Robin wrote: > > I apologise if this has been asked before or if there is a simple and > obvious way to