ionary disagrees? Then
again, the dictionary isn't right by default.
--
Sincerely, and with thanks,
Eugene T.S. Wong
romise to try not to respond.
If there is anybody that agrees with any of my proposals, other than
, then please let me know off-list. I'd be interested in getting to
know you.
--
Sincerely, and with thanks,
Eugene T.S. Wong
semantic markup. An entire society can't even speak 1
language consistently, let alone mark it up semantically.
--
Sincerely, and with thanks,
Eugene T.S. Wong
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 02:21:40 -0800, Anne van Kesteren
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting "Eugene T.S. Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
is no more semantic that , , or , yet they
have their uses.
You snipped the part about not being in the proposal for HTML5
which is
r s, then we limit ourselves to what we
can name our documents. The problem here is the same as any language.
Words and concepts get associated with different contexts, and as a result
meanings become diluted. We can counter the effects by allowing ourselves
more HTML elements, and at the very least, the continued use of already
created elements that don't create bad code.
--
Sincerely, and with thanks,
Eugene T.S. Wong
anization
with very little changing content, it would be very reasonable to have it
all on 1 page.
I hope that clarifies things.
--
Sincerely, and with thanks,
Eugene T.S. Wong
learning curve would be much lower.
I'm just thinking out loud.
Comments? Questions?
--
Sincerely, and with thanks,
Eugene T.S. Wong
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 06:18:46 -0800, Anne van Kesteren
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting "Eugene T.S. Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
is no more semantic that , , or , yet they
have their uses.
I believe that they are useful for visual user agents, in that we
do
g.
Hmm, I was under the impression that we have selectors and classes to
define elements to have more than 1 meaning..?
--
Sincerely, and with thanks,
Eugene T.S. Wong
ll get incorrect
results from a paragraph count if, as suggested by Web Apps 1.0,
they use for the essay's byline.) As a result, will come to
mean "present this as a block with extra vertical margins".
But isn't it possible to redefine the draft to limit the definition?
--
Sincerely, and with thanks,
Eugene T.S. Wong
at I know and understand.
--
Sincerely, and with thanks,
Eugene T.S. Wong
wants more details, then just say so.
--
Sincerely, and with thanks,
Eugene T.S. Wong
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:25:23 -0800, James Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eugene T.S. Wong wrote:
I'd much rather
make my own HTML standard.
How can you have your own standard?
I'd just go ahead and write a document explaining how to use the elements.
If nobody wants t
HTML standard.
--
Sincerely, and with thanks,
Eugene T.S. Wong
s as ancestors that are themselves matching these
conditions, should be presented in such a way that the user can jump from
the element to the first dfn element giving the defining instance of that
term". In other words, what if it does have *those types* of ancestors or
descendants?
--
Sincerely, and with thanks,
Eugene T.S. Wong
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:20:05 -0800, Lachlan Hunt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eugene T.S. Wong wrote:
I noticed that there is a element, but no element. Is
there a specific reason for this?
Both of them are quite presentational,
& are presentational as well.
but there is
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:22:12 -0800, Lachlan Hunt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eugene T.S. Wong wrote:
I read the specification on , and I really like it...
Some manuscripts will need to refer to a that is on another
page. Will there be a way of doing that?
foo bar
That would r
wouldn't need to
display the icon/image & overline.
Comments? Questions?
--
Sincerely, and with thanks,
Eugene T.S. Wong
ample:
Foo bar biz baz.
Comments? Questions?
--
Sincerely, and with thanks,
Eugene T.S. Wong
yzappa"
definition and be taken there. If we decide to allow only 1 term per
element, then we wouldn't need to use and thus could write:
.
.
.
foo
Lorum ipsum...
.
.
.
etc.
The specs say DT doesn't have to contain a definition term. What other
things would it be used for?
--
Sincerely, and with thanks,
Eugene T.S. Wong
Hi again. Are tired of reading my emails yet? ;^P Please don't answer that
question!! ;^)
I noticed that there is a element, but no element. Is there
a specific reason for this?
--
Sincerely, and with thanks,
Eugene T.S. Wong
refer to a that is on another page.
Will there be a way of doing that?
--
Sincerely, and with thanks,
Eugene T.S. Wong
hts? Questions? Comments?
--
Sincerely, and with thanks,
Eugene T.S. Wong
23 matches
Mail list logo
