Re: common URL encoding/ decoding (base64)

2006-11-26 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
* Korbinian Bachl: These was aimed at the missing decoding of these issues in pageparameters, however, I now wonder if it wouldnt be better to give wicket a common URL filter wich decodes and encodes all URLs before they are used/ released so that these are solved forever.

Component.replaceWith() and AjaxRequestTarget in wicket-1.x

2006-11-26 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
Hi, I notice after upgrading from wicket 1.2 to current wicket-1.x that replaceWith() combined with an AjaxRequestTarget does not work anymore. I recall that you added smart markup ids with auto increments. So what I propose is to add to the migrate-1.3 wiki page the following,

AW: common URL encoding/ decoding (base64)

2006-11-26 Thread Korbinian Bachl
sounds very promising - like i wrote to eelco: if all URL things would be centralised and go through 1 place at the end (encode)/ begining (decode) then the world would be open to handle most special url needs easier - e.g: language-tag in URLs, global needed params etc. as it could go this

Re: common URL encoding/ decoding (base64)

2006-11-26 Thread Johan Compagner
Reqeust.encodeUrl is the common base point where all urls are going through. But you also want a decode place where the incomming url (that can be any thing then, first passes through?) On 11/26/06, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sounds very promising - like i wrote to eelco: if all

Re: Component.replaceWith() and AjaxRequestTarget in wicket-1.x

2006-11-26 Thread Igor Vaynberg
our replace methods should migrate the id imho. please add an rfe. -igor On 11/26/06, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I notice after upgrading from wicket 1.2 to current wicket-1.x that replaceWith() combined with an AjaxRequestTarget does not work anymore. I

AW: common URL encoding/ decoding (base64)

2006-11-26 Thread Korbinian Bachl
yeah - thats my thought i mean encoding is useless as long as we have no common decoding gateway, right? imagine, that you can build a wicket app where you can put additional info into the url just before the app-root itself... e.g: site/mountpoint site/additionalthings/mountpoint without

broken unit tests for Wicket 2.0

2006-11-26 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Could someone please take a look at what's wrong with Wicket 2.0's unit tests? Besides the fact that we have 5 failures and 2 errors, they generate an enormous amount of serialization errors. Eelco