Re: Single-page applications: bad idea in Wicket ?

2007-02-07 Thread Matej Knopp
Al Maw wrote: Matej Knopp wrote: First of all, the hybrid urls would fix the refresh problem, but definitely won't fix ajax back button. I don't see much we can do about supporting back button with ajax. That can be possible with full blown ajax framework (like backbase), but wicket was

Vote to remove final on Component#getEscapeModelStrings()

2007-02-07 Thread Al Maw
Hi, Why is getEscapeModelStrings() in Component final? It would be nice to be able to override this, for situations such as highlighting labels with null model objects or similar. Sure, I can do the escaping myself, but it seems tedious. So, vote to make it non-final. +1 :) Also, shouldn't

AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior change (by frank/jpq?)

2007-02-07 Thread Johan Compagner
it was this: protected final String getJsTimeoutCall(final Duration updateInterval) { return setTimeout(function() { + getCallbackScript(false, true) + }, + updateInterval.getMilliseconds() + );; } and now this: protected final String getJsTimeoutCall(final

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread James McLaughlin
It might be worthwhile to keep wicket-stuff-develop so that when it comes time to coordinate a release or encourage wicket-stuff-developers to make some changes (like mavenizing their projects) we won't pollute wicket-user. But for this to work, we would need to make sure all the project

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread James McLaughlin
No doubt that would be great for making announcements regarding project releases and what not, but for coordinating work I think we would need more back and forth than an rss feed could provide. I'm cool with it either way, though. On 2/7/07, Al Maw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: James McLaughlin

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread Eelco Hillenius
but for coordinating work I think we would need more back and forth than an rss feed could provide. I'm cool with it either way, though. For that we can keep using this list and the user list. There's usually an overlap between all those projects and the core project anyway. Eelco

Re: Vote to remove final on Component#getEscapeModelStrings()

2007-02-07 Thread Al Maw
Jonathan Locke wrote: +1 however, should not be renamed. it is in the javabeans spec to use is and get interchangeably for booleans as it makes sense case- by-case. since isEscapeModelStrings doesn't make any sense in english, the get form (which makes some sense) is preferred IMO. Fair

Re: Vote to remove final on Component#getEscapeModelStrings()

2007-02-07 Thread Eelco Hillenius
however, should not be renamed. it is in the javabeans spec to use is and get interchangeably for booleans as it makes sense case- by-case. since isEscapeModelStrings doesn't make any sense in english, the get form (which makes some sense) is preferred IMO. Fair enough. Everything else in

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Hmm, I think we resolved at the start of incubation that sf.net things for wicket-stuff such as lists, issue trackers and wiki's should remain outside ASF. This would mean that we rollback the list part of that decision. I don't mind as the traffic on those list is /really/ minimal. Martijn

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread James McLaughlin
Agreed. +1 I only brought this up becuase some of us have been reluctant to create noise on the mailing lists, to the degree that we have contacted each other off list. jim On 2/7/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but for coordinating work I think we would need more back and

Re: Vote to remove final on Component#getEscapeModelStrings()

2007-02-07 Thread Igor Vaynberg
On 2/7/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, it's more indirection and you don't want to have people bitching about too much indirection on ##wicket do you? ;) pfft, i vote for IMarkupSaferMaker5000 -igor

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread Martijn Dashorst
I'd rather have that traffic on the user/dev lists where everybody listens :) Martijn On 2/7/07, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Agreed. +1 I only brought this up becuase some of us have been reluctant to create noise on the mailing lists, to the degree that we have contacted each

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread Eelco Hillenius
This would mean that we rollback the list part of that decision. Yep. Sorry about that. I just noticed that there was an unanswered question lingering around for days; obviously because hardly anyone of the wicket-stuff people actually is subscribed. Furthermore, I think that even though it is

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread Eelco Hillenius
On 2/7/07, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Agreed. +1 I only brought this up becuase some of us have been reluctant to create noise on the mailing lists, to the degree that we have contacted each other off list. If you can get there, ##wicket on freenode.net is a great way to reduce

RFE: inlined syntax for fragments in markup

2007-02-07 Thread Timo Rantalaiho
Hello all, Sometimes when working with fine-grained components it might be handy to use Fragments, but for cases when the same fragment is not reused, I find the current syntax a bit complex. So when it's currently like this klips ===

Line endings in source files

2007-02-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
Hi, As a sign of code quality I give excessive value to the source file's line endings. Currently, only speaking of wicket-1.x/wicket: * 103 files have DOS line endings * 335 files do not have the svn:eol-style property. Could you please review this, that would make a great improvement

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread Vincent Demay
+1 Eelco Hillenius a écrit : On 2/7/07, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Agreed. +1 I only brought this up becuase some of us have been reluctant to create noise on the mailing lists, to the degree that we have contacted each other off list. If you can get there, ##wicket on

Re: Fwd: [Wicket-stuff-develop] Dojo DragDrop

2007-02-07 Thread Vincent Demay
Eelco Hillenius a écrit : Forwarded from the wicket-stuff list. Eelco -- Forwarded message -- From: vsubedar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Feb 3, 2007 3:50 AM Subject: [Wicket-stuff-develop] Dojo DragDrop To: wicket-stuff-develop@lists.sourceforge.net No drag-drop related files in

Re: Line endings in source files

2007-02-07 Thread Igor Vaynberg
we use subclipse, not sure how to hoook that config file into it... -igor On 2/7/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Eelco Hillenius: I hoped this was automated by now. Hrm. What's the best way to fix this and be sure we'll be consistent in the future as well? To fix it,

Re: AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior change (by frank/jpq?)

2007-02-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
* Johan Compagner: it was this: protected final String getJsTimeoutCall(final Duration updateInterval) { return setTimeout(function() { + getCallbackScript(false, true) + }, + updateInterval.getMilliseconds() + );; } and now this: protected final

Re: AbstractAjaxTimerBehavior change (by frank/jpq?)

2007-02-07 Thread Johan Compagner
thx will change that. On 2/7/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Johan Compagner: it was this: protected final String getJsTimeoutCall(final Duration updateInterval) { return setTimeout(function() { + getCallbackScript(false, true) + }, +

Re: shutting down wicket-stuff lists?

2007-02-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
* Eelco Hillenius: How do you feel about shutting down the wicket-stuff lists (wicket-stuff-develop@lists.sourceforge.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED])? +1 Didn't event know they existed -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/

Re: Line endings in source files

2007-02-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
* Igor Vaynberg: we use subclipse, not sure how to hoook that config file into it... I also use Subclipse, and it uses the native SVN client (through the JavaHL bindings) so it correctly picks up the SVN configuration. Do you use Subclipse through the full-Java SVN

Re: Line endings in source files

2007-02-07 Thread Igor Vaynberg
yes i use svnkit i threw the config into C:\Documents and Settings\ivaynberg\Subversion, not sure how to test if it actually gets picked up -igor On 2/7/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Igor Vaynberg: we use subclipse, not sure how to hoook that config file into

Re: [Vote] Release Wicket 1.2.5

2007-02-07 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Did everybody take a close look at the release candidate? Is it good for general availability? Martijn On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now available. Martijn On 2/4/07, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another thing: Where is wicket-examples? Frank On 2/4/07,

maxPageVersions

2007-02-07 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Hi, Thanks for the fix for the FilePageStore version manager Johan. Now, there still is the UndoPageVersionManager that is used when you configure the HttpSessionStore. The number is now max-int, which is crazy and dangerous. I think a better max would be, say, 30. WDYT? Btw, I think we should

Re: [Vote] Release Wicket 1.2.5

2007-02-07 Thread Frank Bille
Other than what I've mentioned it looks fine (what did you do about the notice/license in jar files? Frank On 2/7/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did everybody take a close look at the release candidate? Is it good for general availability? Martijn On 2/4/07, Martijn Dashorst