* Al Maw:
> Yes, needs fixing. Am looking into this right now.
Any ETA? Otherwise I'll just commit the patch, and we'll see what
happens when it's being tested by more people. Unit tests should
be good enough, is there some corner cases that are not handled?
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka
* Jonathan Locke:
>
>
> so i propose a vote to add this. i'm +1.
+1
I have one in every project.
It is particularly useful for a reusable modal dialog that is
defined in the page, and replaced/shown in various forms.
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/j
On 5/5/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You're right about that. EmptyPanel is better, and it should probably be final.
Yes, I think EmptyPanel has the merit of being more obvious in its
intent, and less error prone.
Xavier
Eelco
On 5/5/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
You're right about that. EmptyPanel is better, and it should probably be final.
Eelco
On 5/5/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
will that really make things better? if you misname the markup file you will
now get component not found rather then markup not found.
-igor
On 5/5/07, Ma
will that really make things better? if you misname the markup file you will
now get component not found rather then markup not found.
-igor
On 5/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about giving Panel.java an accompanying Panel.html file? That
would obviate the need of addin
That's actually not a bad idea. Xavier, you think you would have found
that/ is it as obvious?
Eelco
On 5/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about giving Panel.java an accompanying Panel.html file? That
would obviate the need of adding EmptyPanel, and anyone subclassing
Pane
How about giving Panel.java an accompanying Panel.html file? That
would obviate the need of adding EmptyPanel, and anyone subclassing
Panel would override it by supplying their own markup.
Martijn
On 5/5/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1, another class I can remove from our pro
+1, another class I can remove from our project :)
On 5/5/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so i propose a vote to add this. i'm +1.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
> Yeah. I actually think I proposed something like this, or at least
> +1-ed one at more than a year ago. You'll have to
its a bit redundent api but because of the naming i guess its is fine to
have.
johan
On 5/5/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so i propose a vote to add this. i'm +1.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
> Yeah. I actually think I proposed something like this, or at least
> +1-ed one at
I am against this method
If you want that do it your self.
its simple
MyPage extends WebPage
{
private boole firstAttached = false;
onAttach()
{
if (firstAttached) // do something
firstAttached = true
}
}
johan
On 5/4/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Although I do stil
Yeah, I removed ~ a week ago. It was of no use since we have version
merging for 1.3.
-Matej
On 5/5/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think Matej removed the concept of unversioned behavior listeners as
it was flawed.
Eelco
On 5/5/07, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
+1
This is something I add to figure out how to do myself with a
WebMarkupContainer, would have been easier with what you're proposing.
Xavier
On 5/5/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Eelco
On 5/5/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> so i propose a vote to add
I think Matej removed the concept of unversioned behavior listeners as
it was flawed.
Eelco
On 5/5/07, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
May be it is too early, but I have a strange problem.
I'm currently playing with backporting some MarkupParser functionality
which makes it is mo
[x] Yes, propose Wicket for Graduation
[ ] No, Wicket is not ready to graduate
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
+1
Eelco
On 5/5/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so i propose a vote to add this. i'm +1.
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
> Yeah. I actually think I proposed something like this, or at least
> +1-ed one at more than a year ago. You'll have to dig in the archives
> to find out why oth
15 matches
Mail list logo
