FYI - The last bullet from the first list on the Welcome section on
the home page says Download Wicket 1.2.5 when it should say 1.2.6.
Jon
I'm curious if the case would ever come up where someone wants to extend a
Clusterable class but not want the extended class to itself be Clusterable.
On 2/28/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm making an inventory of classes that should be instrumented by
Terracotta if you
I understand that 3.x hasn't been started yet, but I'm curious what - if
anything - is being held off for 3.x instead of being done in 2.x? For
example, if 2.x is allowed to and will have for example API changes, what
type of change qualifies waiting for 3.x versus 2.x?
Thanks,
Jon
On 2/6/07,
project which also excludes us from his preferences I guess.
Regarding the martini's, I think Eelco is very good at consuming them,
not sure about his mixing qualities.
Martijn
On 2/5/07, Jon Steelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have folks seen this interesting albeit lengthy screencast comparing
Eelco,
Good points about the planning with the unanticipated incubation book
writing.
On 2/5/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so please next time before posting something like this at least read up
Igor,
Wow, nice complete post. Your final line changes the tone of your post a
On 2/5/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you have to understand how frustrating this is.
it happened when MVEL came out and now its happening with t5. our users
read
about something new and shiny and then post emails like yours to the list
without doing any research. so what happens
I now have a measure of you, Igor, and find you unable to have a fair
exchange of understanding and mutual improvement. Too bad for you.
Thanks,
Jon
Then for using 2.0 how far out a deadline would you folks recommend
for a project someone is beginning now?
Jon
On 1/30/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He talked about a March 30 deadline, so I think 1.3 would be the best
between the new features we support and stability.
Eelco
This sets a pretty high standardis Wicket 2.0 going to be as much better
than Wicket 1.x than this new look is compared to the old?
:-)
I'm curious - why are 3 different versions of Wicket (1.2.x, 1.3.x, 2.x)
being worked on? Isn't that a burden compared to focusing on two? When will
the 1.2.x line be let go?
Thanks,
Jon
On 12/9/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
We have several fixes in for 1.2.4, and one
10 matches
Mail list logo
