Re: [vote] Name the release after 1.3

://www.nabble.com/-vote--Name-the-release-after-1.3-tf3603749.html#a10245158 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [vote] Name the release after 1.3

[ ] Apache Wicket 1.4 Binding: Al Maw Non binding: Jean Baptiste Quenot, Charlie Dobbie 3 +1 [ ] Apache Wicket 1.5 (after the JDK) Binding: Johan Non Binding: Erik van Oosten 2 +1 [ ] Apache Wicket 2.0 (i.e. becomes our old 2.0 minus the c'tor change) Binding: Martijn, Igor, Frank,

Re: [vote] Name the release after 1.3

-- Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-vote--Name-the-release-after

Re: [vote] Name the release after 1.3

[] Apache Wicket Omega i see most are voting for wicket 2.0 are we sure about that? i think it won't even be that big api break (i really think it will be much less then 1.2 - 1.3) and it will be still very close to what we call now 2.0.. so it could be confusing in the short term. so mostly it

Re: [vote] Name the release after 1.3

* Martijn Dashorst: Apache Wicket 1.3 will be followed by: [x] Apache Wicket 1.4 [ ] Apache Wicket 1.5 (after the JDK) [ ] Apache Wicket 5 (similar, but more accurate) [ ] Apache Wicket 2.0 (i.e. becomes our old 2.0 minus the c'tor change) [ ] Apache Wicket 2007 [ ] Apache Wicket r59332

Re: [vote] Name the release after 1.3

Wednesday, April 18, 2007, 11:04:12 PM, Martijn wrote: There is a vote already in place for switching the development branches around. Now it is time to name the release after 1.3 (and not 1.3.1 :). Apache Wicket 1.3 will be followed by: [+1] Apache Wicket 2.0 (i.e. becomes our old 2.0

Re: [vote] Name the release after 1.3

[x] Apache Wicket 1.4 (Non-binding vote) Having declared 2.0 a dead-end, you shouldn't release anything with the same version number within six months at least - there's too much potential for confusion IMHO. Not to mention tutorials and code snippets that are floating around labelled for

[discussion] Name the release after 1.3 WAS Re: [vote] Name the release after 1.3

its not just an api break. it is also the fact that we changed the underlying technology. ive seen a lot of projects jump a major version when they switched to jdk 1.5 without adding too many features. it will also make it easier for martijn and eelco to continue with their book as they dont

Re: [vote] Name the release after 1.3

Charlie Dobbie wrote: [x] Apache Wicket 1.4 (Non-binding vote) Having declared 2.0 a dead-end, you shouldn't release anything with the same version number within six months at least - there's too much potential for confusion IMHO. Not to mention tutorials and code snippets that are floating

Re: [vote] Name the release after 1.3

On 19.4.2007, at 1.04, Martijn Dashorst wrote: Apache Wicket 1.3 will be followed by: [x] Apache Wicket 2.0 (i.e. becomes our old 2.0 minus the c'tor change)

Re: [vote] Name the release after 1.3

[x] Apache Wicket 7.05 - I'm an Ubuntu user... :D On 4/19/07, Janne Hietamäki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 19.4.2007, at 1.04, Martijn Dashorst wrote: Apache Wicket 1.3 will be followed by: [x] Apache Wicket 2.0 (i.e. becomes our old 2.0 minus the c'tor change) -- Bruno Borges Summa

[vote] Name the release after 1.3

There is a vote already in place for switching the development branches around. Now it is time to name the release after 1.3 (and not 1.3.1 :). Apache Wicket 1.3 will be followed by: [ ] Apache Wicket 1.4 [ ] Apache Wicket 1.5 (after the JDK) [ ] Apache Wicket 5 (similar, but more accurate) [ ]

Re: [vote] Name the release after 1.3

Apache Wicket 1.3 will be followed by: [X] Apache Wicket 2.0 (i.e. becomes our old 2.0 minus the c'tor change) Martijn -- Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket

Re: [vote] Name the release after 1.3

On 4/19/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] Apache Wicket XP Vista 2007 [x] Apache Wicket 2.0 (i.e. becomes our old 2.0 minus the c'tor change) Frank