Re: [wicketstuff dojo] JS inheritance and the wicketstuff namespace

2007-04-17 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
* Bart Molenkamp: I wanted to make better use of JavaScript inheritance using Dojo. snip/ Therefore, I created a dojo module named wicketstuff, which can access anything under org.wicketstuff.dojo. For example, I now have a javascript class wicketstuff.dojodnd.DojoDropContainer

Re: [wicketstuff dojo] JS inheritance and the wicketstuff namespace

2007-04-17 Thread Vincent Demay
Bart Molenkamp a écrit : Vincent Demay wrote: If I well understand it is a class named wicketstuff giving access to each function of each package as a subclass of wicketstuff? I like that, so +1 I don't understand exactly what you mean. I now have classes coded in JavaScript (similair

Re: [wicketstuff dojo] JS inheritance and the wicketstuff namespace

2007-04-17 Thread Vincent Demay
If I well understand it is a class named wicketstuff giving access to each function of each package as a subclass of wicketstuff? I like that, so +1 -- Vincent Jean-Baptiste Quenot a écrit : * Bart Molenkamp: I wanted to make better use of JavaScript inheritance using Dojo. snip/

[wicketstuff dojo] JS inheritance and the wicketstuff namespace

2007-04-17 Thread Bart Molenkamp
Hi, I wanted to make better use of JavaScript inheritance using Dojo. For example, using Java I can extend DojoDropContainer to implement (server-side) specific drop behavior. But I also wanted some specific behavior on the JavaScript side without having to copy/paste all the existing js

Re: [wicketstuff dojo] JS inheritance and the wicketstuff namespace

2007-04-17 Thread Bart Molenkamp
Vincent Demay wrote: If I well understand it is a class named wicketstuff giving access to each function of each package as a subclass of wicketstuff? I like that, so +1 I don't understand exactly what you mean. I now have classes coded in JavaScript (similair like most - if not all -