Re: [Wicket-user] SignOut

provide a french version of PageExpiredErrorPage_FR_fr.html in wcket/markup/html/pages is one option. Providing your own Page through registering on Apps (or Apps Setting) is another option. Juergen On 8/25/05, Dzenan Ridjanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > In Wicket-1.1-b3 sign out (get

Re: [Wicket-user] CSS and visibility in DreamWeaver

Right. It is meant only for resources on the class path. Juergen On 8/25/05, Phil Kulak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But that doesn't work for resources that are not on the classpath. > > On 8/23/05, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Another alternativ is , though the current ver

[Wicket-user] SignOut

Hi, In Wicket-1.1-b3 sign out (getSession().invalidate();) gives me: Page Expired The page you requested has expired. Return to home page Would a regular user understand that he has just signed out? I am not sure what has to be done for i18n (e.g., french text)? Dzenan

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: What about a wicket-announce maillist?

+1 David Heffelfinger wrote: +1 --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams *

Re: [Wicket-user] IPageable

What to do if PageCount > 0 and currentPage == -1 I actually was also thinking about this but could not find a real use-case. I don't even know wheter it makes sense, because as I understand the component is responsible for bounding between 0 and pageCount-1. Anyway ... (then don't display

Re: [Wicket-user] CSS and visibility in DreamWeaver

But that doesn't work for resources that are not on the classpath. On 8/23/05, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another alternativ is , though the current version in CVS > is flawed for none-html, but has already been fixed on my laptop. > Wicket will than create the necessary Link

Re: [Wicket-user] Javadoc package names

I fixed it. But please be aware that we strongly suggest you use maven to build wicket. Juergen On 8/24/05, Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's not a big thing, but the Javadoc task in the 1.1-b3 Ant build file > is expecting packages named "com.voicetribe.*", and it failed since > the

[Wicket-user] Javadoc package names

It's not a big thing, but the Javadoc task in the 1.1-b3 Ant build file is expecting packages named "com.voicetribe.*", and it failed since there are no such packages. That means the "dist" task also fails. Changing it to "wicket.*" makes everything work. -- Scott --

Re: [Wicket-user] NoSuchMethodError when setting a Model?

Thanks - I couldn't see anything obvious, but took it as a reason to update to 1.1b3, and that sorted it. /Gwyn On 24/08/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > almost everytime you have this means that somehow it finds a much older > wicket.jar first. > If at compile everything goes ok.

Re: [Wicket-user] "A better integrated way of dealing with CSS..."

Of you want a more stable version, you could use 1.0. Even that had an API break, but only to solve an actual bug. For 1.1 - still in beta - we have more API changes and additions. We are not changing or core prinicpals though. Hard to please everyone I guess. Personally, I prefer break when they m

Re: [Wicket-user] "A better integrated way of dealing with CSS..."

That's what I at first thought was happening, and was quite impressed. That makes quite a bit of sense. Would the same thing be available for Javascript tags? Meta tags? I'm very impressed with Wicket so far, but it does look like a bit of a moving target... -- Scott Juergen Donnerstag

Re: [Wicket-user] "A better integrated way of dealing with CSS..."

Now /that/ would be sweet indeed :) And that would also work in components (/ header contributions)? Eelco On 8/24/05, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hopefully this week I get sorted out. Than you simple do > > > > > > > > and that is it. No java at all. The Package

Re: [Wicket-user] "A better integrated way of dealing with CSS..."

hopefully this week I get sorted out. Than you simple do and that is it. No java at all. The PackageResource will be automatically created for you. Thus style.css goes next to the html file in the same directory. Juergen On 8/24/05, Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, I'

Re: [Wicket-user] "A better integrated way of dealing with CSS..."

Yeah, I'm probably behind. I pulled the build down as recently as Monday, but that's ages ago in Internet time, escpecially when not getting the sources from CVS. I do think that it would be nice to replace all this with something like: addToCSSHeader(Tree.class, "tree.css"); but I suppo

Re: [Wicket-user] "A better integrated way of dealing with CSS..."

Yep, though my guess is that you are looking at older sources, as StaticResourceReference is now PackageResourceReference. Basically, we had the proof again (for the 10.000th time :)) that static is evil, so we changed our package resource loading algoritm. There have been posts about this last wee

RE: [Wicket-user] wicket + eclipse

When you add and remove a method don’t you need to update the vtable? Or is that not kept with instances in java? -Igor > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Johan Compagner > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 12:41 AM > To: wicket-us

Re: [Wicket-user] "A better integrated way of dealing with CSS..."

I didn't find the DatePicker yet, but if I understand Tree, correctly, this is fairly straightforward. It looks as though this is handled through the HTML using and with the following Java: private static final StaticResourceReference CSS = new StaticResourceRe

Re: [Wicket-user] "A better integrated way of dealing with CSS..."

The advantage of using the header distributions as we now support out-of-the-box, and that you can see in components like DatePicker, is that it works in /any/ page. It is completely self contained. Eelco On 8/24/05, Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not certain I need it. In my hom

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket:link problems

Thanks Juergen i use absolute paths and all is working as expected On 8/23/05, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > please see the linkomatic example for the various links available. > wicket:link is limited that the html must either be in the same > directory, a subdirectory (subpackag

Re: [Wicket-user] "A better integrated way of dealing with CSS..."

I'm not certain I need it. In my homegrown proof-of-concept framework, a component could implement a similar interface (with an identical name!): public interface HeaderContributor { public List getStyleHrefs(); public List getJSHrefs(); public List getMetas(); }

Re: [Wicket-user] "A better integrated way of dealing with CSS..."

For a start, take a look at how Tree does it. For a slighly more complex one, look at DatePicker, which is part of the extensions project. Eelco On 8/24/05, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wicket provides several difference means to reference css and js > files. Unfortunately the

[Wicket-user] "A better integrated way of dealing with CSS..."

Obligatory disclaimer: I'm brand new to Wicket. I'm trying to use it on my first project. The Wiki page on including CSS references for components (http://tinyurl.com/8aqp5) finishes with this comment: "A better integrated way of dealing with CSS, JavaScript, etc, is planned for Wic

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: [Wicket-develop] 1.1.b3 Pageable changes?

That was one thing that was done before that i believe because i my refactor i didn't touch that. johan Gwyn Evans wrote: Thanks. Just for completeness, the other change I came across was the removal of my ListView's .getItemCount(), which I replaced with .getList().size(). /Gwyn On 24/08/

Re: [Wicket-user] "A better integrated way of dealing with CSS..."

Wicket provides several difference means to reference css and js files. Unfortunately the documentation is perfect, ... What exactly is your problem or your question. In the simplest case use plain (X)HTML without any wicket specific code. . The examples may serve as references as well. Juergen O

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: [Wicket-develop] 1.1.b3 Pageable changes?

Thanks. Just for completeness, the other change I came across was the removal of my ListView's .getItemCount(), which I replaced with .getList().size(). /Gwyn On 24/08/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it is a pretty simple change > All > > PageableListViewXX > from package:

[Wicket-user] Re: visible == redered

Juergen Donnerstag wrote: I did the changes necessary to not render invisible component and it passes all existing unit tests. Any more suggestions (votes) on this topic? Juergen I'm happy! /Anders -- http://ojalgo.org/ Mathematics, Linear Algebra and Optimisation with Java --

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: KeyValueCoding and ProperyModel

I'm +1 on changing this as well Juergen On 8/24/05, Anders Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eelco Hillenius wrote: > > > I find it perfectly natural that the 'name' > > property of a null object gets me null when working with Ognl. In > > fact, that's another good reason to support this; al

[Wicket-user] Re: KeyValueCoding and ProperyModel

Eelco Hillenius wrote: I find it perfectly natural that the 'name' property of a null object gets me null when working with Ognl. In fact, that's another good reason to support this; all expression languages like Ognl, but also JSF's and for example Velocity's allows you to have expression where

Re: [Wicket-user] What about a wicket-announce maillist?

As an interested bystander (and hopefully eventual wicket user), I'd say +1 on a separate wicket-announce list. dwh Gwyn Evans wrote: +1 I'd say Users+Devs+Anns, rather than just Anns, though. /Gwyn --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by

[Wicket-user] Unit Testing

I looked around on the wiki but didn't find anything on unit testing Pages and Components. Are there docs or an example that I missed? Thanks. --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San F

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: KeyValueCoding and ProperyModel

Yep,. it should just ignore it. The property model regconizes it has null as the actual model object, so it should just do nothing. Though I can see this might introduce bugs that aren't immediately obvious, it is still the case that we can't fail fast as the actual model object can come from anywh

Re: [Wicket-user] Unit Testing

I'm an IDEA user :) On 8/24/05, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And I think the eclipse plugin provided by Joni is meant to help in > that area as well. > > Juergen > > On 8/24/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nothing written you to my knowledge. You could sta

[Wicket-user] Re: What about a wicket-announce maillist?

+1 --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process I

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: KeyValueCoding and ProperyModel

i think martijn means What happens if you get the post request from the poster. Where should the textfield set the data on? I agree the other way around then null is just null... johan Eelco Hillenius wrote: No, why? Wicket should react by checking for nulls and not failing. Person p = (Perso

Re: [Wicket-user] Unit Testing

And I think the eclipse plugin provided by Joni is meant to help in that area as well. Juergen On 8/24/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nothing written you to my knowledge. You could start looking at both > the unit tests we provide with Wicket and Wicket-examples (that use > jWeb

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: visible == redered

you could make a setting and then in development setting it can be default on (do render) and in deploy default off (don't render) And developers can override it them selfs. But maybe this is to much trouble johan Juergen Donnerstag wrote: I did the changes necessary to not render invisible

Re: [Wicket-user] Unit Testing

Nothing written you to my knowledge. You could start looking at both the unit tests we provide with Wicket and Wicket-examples (that use jWebUnit). You could then decide which method you like better. And if you have any idea's of how to enhance our junit support, let's hear them. Eelco On 8/24/0

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: KeyValueCoding and ProperyModel

No, why? Wicket should react by checking for nulls and not failing. Person p = (Person)getModelObject(); won't fail if it's null. Any PropertyModel should just return null if the 'master' property is null. Why is that so strange? And what does it have to do with parsing request parameters? I find

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: visible == redered

I did the changes necessary to not render invisible component and it passes all existing unit tests. Any more suggestions (votes) on this topic? Juergen On 8/24/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if i had to choose then don't render at all if not visible > A developer will also test

Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with the new wicket version

Thanks for the reply, My mistake, my project had the old wicket-extensions project as a dependant project. That was causing the problem.   Thanks Dipu   - Original Message - From: "Eelco Hillenius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, August 24

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: KeyValueCoding and ProperyModel

How should Wicket react to this? public MyPage() { add(new MyForm("form", new CompoundPropertyModel(null))); } public class MyForm extends Form { public MyForm(String id, IModel model) { super(id, model); add(new TextField("name")); } } This is what you propose... How sho

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: visible == redered

if i had to choose then don't render at all if not visible A developer will also test the component if it is visible so it will get that error then. Not visible. Is just not there. If even the markup/component don't apply that can happen And it could be that this is even a thing i want?? I hav

[Wicket-user] Re: [Wicket-develop] 1.1.b3 Pageable changes?

it is a pretty simple change All PageableListViewXX from package: wicket.markup.html.list are now PagingX in the package wicket.markup.html.navigation.paging And IPageableComponent == IPageable. The constructors calls are the same One thing to take care of (if you did use @override

Re: [Wicket-user] Problem with the new wicket version

I thought there was a note on the API breaks with the news item? Anyway, from the top of my head, StaticResourceReference was renamed to PackageResourceReference. Eelco On 8/24/05, Dipu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am trying to update my application to use the new version of wicket 1.1 > b3. >

[Wicket-user] Problem with the new wicket version

I am trying to update my application to use the new version of wicket 1.1 b3.   But when i start my jetty server im getting a NoClassDefFoundError. Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: wicket/markup/html/StaticResourceReference   I checked in the source tree for the file

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: visible == redered

On 8/24/05, Anders Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isn't that strict checking something that should be done when compiling > (someone has the time to code a wicket builder for eclipse) and not at > runtime? > 1) you suggest to compare java code and markup at compile time? 2) than you need t

[Wicket-user] Re: visible == redered

Isn't that strict checking something that should be done when compiling (someone has the time to code a wicket builder for eclipse) and not at runtime? At runtime I'd like the ability to disable components that are not in a working state because they are currently not used/displayed. As Gili

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: visible == redered

we could do, it seems not to be a large change, but ... Currently users (designers and developers) can be sure that wicket throws an exception if there not a 1:1 mapping between all wicket tag (wicket:id and wrote: > ehmm it does get renderd.. Only the output doesn't get streamed (all > rendering

[Wicket-user] Re: IModel - wiki addition

Detach /is/ called automatically for all models that are set on components. In other words, at the end of a request, we visit all components, and ask each component to detach their model. However, models that dont have /attachable/ behaviour, do nothing on detaching; it's just a no-op for them. Th

[Wicket-user] Re: Kickstart Problem

That looks allright. H... Are you sure that constructor is called (did you check using logging or your debugger?). Eelco On 8/24/05, Eric Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First of all, I apologize for the beginner question. I am fairly new to > Java and Wicket. > > I have download th

[Wicket-user] Re: KeyValueCoding and ProperyModel

Unfortunately, I don't own an Apple. Martijn does though :) I don't agree with Martijn actually. Like I said, we have had developer discussions about this before. I think we should allow nulls in all our models. I can't see anything wrong with that. Just an 'empty' case. And even if we decided (li

[Wicket-user] Re: IModel - wiki addition

When/where/how are models shared between sessions or application instances? When should I call detach rather than just dumping the model? I trust detach is never called automagically. /Anders -- http://ojalgo.org/ Mathematics, Linear Algebra and Optimisation with Java Christian Essl wrote: As

Re: [Wicket-user] What about a wicket-announce maillist?

+1 I'd say Users+Devs+Anns, rather than just Anns, though. /Gwyn On 24/08/05, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Erik van Oosten wrote: > > > The traffic on this list is way up and above my reading capacity. > > Still I'd hate to miss the announcements. So, what do you think? > > I

Re: [Wicket-user] What about a wicket-announce maillist?

i would say every dev is already also on announce (and i think every user also) Can't we if we subscribe to user or dev look it also is on the announce and if it isn't also subscribe them there? Then don't do duplicate posts.. Who can post to an announcement? johan Martijn Dashorst wrote: E

Re: [Wicket-user] Re: wicket + eclipse

Eelco Hillenius wrote: There have been quite a few API breaks between the M versions of 3.1. The kind of breaks that doesn't give you compile errors too. Glad it's final now. final? No! we already have 3.2M1 ;) johan --- SF.Net email

Re: [Wicket-user] What about a wicket-announce maillist?

Erik van Oosten wrote: The traffic on this list is way up and above my reading capacity. Still I'd hate to miss the announcements. So, what do you think? I think it is a sound idea... Are there other users +1 on this? And how should we do announcents in the future? Only to the announcement l

[Wicket-user] Re: What about a wicket-announce maillist?

+1, but I'd like to let Martijn decide on it. Eelco On 8/24/05, Erik van Oosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The traffic on this list is way up and above my reading capacity. Still > I'd hate to miss the announcements. So, what do you think? > > Erik. > > > > ---

[Wicket-user] Re: wicket + eclipse

There have been quite a few API breaks between the M versions of 3.1. The kind of breaks that doesn't give you compile errors too. Glad it's final now. Eelco On 8/24/05, Joni Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 09:15 +0200, Juergen Donnerstag wrote: > > Doesn't help. But n

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket + eclipse

yes i know.. VAJ (which i used before eclipse and hotswap) did it a bit better. It could handle changes of classes a bit more. Í do get that when you add a instance var it can't handle that if there are instances in mem of that class.. What i don't get is why a method addition/removal is importa

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket + eclipse

On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 09:15 +0200, Juergen Donnerstag wrote: > Doesn't help. But never mind. I wanted to move to 3.1 final anyway. FYI, I verified the problem with Eclipse 3.1M2. There must have been some changes in Eclipse plugin architecture since it installed fine on 3.1M6 and on 3.1 final. --

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket + eclipse

!SESSION 2005-08-23 23:19:52.934 --- eclipse.buildId=I200411050810 java.version=1.5.0 java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc. BootLoader constants: OS=win32, ARCH=x86, WS=win32, NL=de_DE !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 2005-08-23 23:19:52.974 !MESSAGE An error occured

[Wicket-user] Re: KeyValueCoding and ProperyModel

Martijn Dashorst wrote: Anders, Don't get me wrong, I don't mean to be harsh, but I think you don't 'grok' the Wicket way, given your comments below. I try to give the 'wicket mindset', and it is only my opinion, perhaps other community members feel differently. And I'm handicapted: I'm dutc

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket + eclipse

On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 09:15 +0200, Juergen Donnerstag wrote: > Doesn't help. But never mind. I wanted to move to 3.1 final anyway. Can you send me the stack trace? I could take a peek at it. Sorry for any inconvenience! -- Joni Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Wicket-user] wicket + eclipse

Doesn't help. But never mind. I wanted to move to 3.1 final anyway. Juergen On 8/24/05, Joni Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 08:53 +0200, Juergen Donnerstag wrote: > > I used to eclipse update link to install it on eclipse 3.1M3. Now > > eclipse doesn't start anymore.