Alexandru Popescu wrote:
#: Martijn Dashorst changed the world a bit at a time by saying on
11/17/2005 9:55 PM :#
I see on the home page 'Cache-Control no-cache'. Is this there for a
special reason?
How does this affect the browser?
Martijn
afaik these headers instruct the browser t
Oh, and one of the by products we plan for us writing Wicket In Action
is a useable reference manual. Something that doesn't conflict our
interests with Manning of course, but that serves as a good point of
finding how to do things in Wicket.
Re looking for support: I am currently thinking setting
Martijn and I are writing Wicket In Action currently. We're not using
the gradual examples thing like e.g. Tapestry In Action has because we
don't like it that much. Maybe Martijn more than me, but I thought
such a book-wide example is too far fetched to be useful. Personally,
I am much more charme
irt spring+hibernate+wicket:
Dan is absolutely correct when he says that wicket should never touch
hibernate directly. all the hibernate-related logic should stay inside
spring and be exposed directly through a dao object or through a
service facade. i think wicket-contrib-data and
wicket-contrib-
Sam Gendler wrote:
...
The nice thing is that if
examples use a fairly generic DAO abstraction, it should be possible
to provide nice examples that aren't dependant upon any particular
suite of technologies. Just describe the DAO interface and then use
those them to access standard POJOs. Obvio
Whoops, the missing test files in attachment ... :-)
On 11/18/05, Laurent PETIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, now I have a first attempt to submit.
>
> It is what "could" be considered as a cleaner way to address Matej's
> initial problem.
> But it is a hack to the core, so it's normal that I'v
OK, now I have a first attempt to submit.
It is what "could" be considered as a cleaner way to address Matej's
initial problem.
But it is a hack to the core, so it's normal that I've come up with
something cleaner I think.
And as it's a modification to the core, it's also more error-prone.
It is
OK, I'll try to be more helpful in my criticism...
Having finally found wicket-stuff, I was able to spend some time
looking at the code that addresses my needs (hibernate integration
most specifically), and I'm feeling a little more comfortable. More
importantly, I'm going to have to write sampl
Hmm
the code we were looking at was:
class MyFbPanel extends FeedbackPanel {
private final Component component;
MyFbPanel(String id, Component c) {
super(id);
this.component = c;
}
protected IFeedbackMessageFilter getFeedbackMessageFilter()
{
return new C
Yeah, that's what I did instead and it worked.
Thanks,
AndrewOn 11/17/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
redirectToInterceptPage() should only really be used in the checkAccess() page
If you want to return to a page. Why not give the page that is Editing
the Shipping address the pag
by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click
___
Wi
ourceforge.net
> >>> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> ---
> >>> >> This
ist
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification
sit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
__ NOD32 1.1290 (20051117) Information __
Thi
#: Martijn Dashorst changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 11/17/2005
9:55 PM :#
I see on the home page 'Cache-Control no-cache'. Is this there for a
special reason?
How does this affect the browser?
Martijn
afaik these headers instruct the browser to fetch the page for each hi
I made a copy of the sources on my local disk, and removed those
meta-tags. It didn't help :-(
It probably is a configuration issue. Did you test on a alternate
system, and do you have the same problem there?
Martijn
On 11/17/05, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see on the home p
#: Matej Knopp changed the world a bit at a time by saying on 11/17/2005 8:28
PM :#
No, he is not using resource reference. The site worked, just a while
ago. The image was a static image, served by the http server, just
without the right headers.
-Matej
Matej can you add some more detail
I see on the home page 'Cache-Control no-cache'. Is this there for a
special reason?
How does this affect the browser?
Martijn
On 11/17/05, Dorel Vaida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dorel Vaida wrote:
>
> > Matej Knopp wrote:
> >
> >> Hi. Wicket is hardly responsible for the headers, that co
On 11/17/05, Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not that the documentaion doesn't exist. Much does, and much of it
> is pretty good. But it's rather difficult to find.
I'll try to address this issue soon, preferably this week, but I have
some obligations that are just as important pu
om/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
__ NOD32 1.1290 (20051117) Information __
This message was checked by NOD32
But you don't have the wicket servlet mapped to the images url, so it
has no way to affect the images. Another thing that comes to my mind is
that maybe you have a servlet filter that can cause this, but it doesn't
seem probable to me. Could you send your web.xml?
-Matej
Dorel Vaida wrote:
D
Dorel Vaida wrote:
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi. Wicket is hardly responsible for the headers, that come with your
(static) images.
I thought a little and maybe, but just maybe, the images are not cached
because of the way wicket forms the urls and everything ...
I'm sorry, I can't help you here
On 11/17/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> do you really want that seperating also in the html?
> (with all those spans?)
No, not sure it's what I definitely want, I'm still in the
brainstorming process, as I said.
> Looking at youre example and guessing what the smartform (and t
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi. Wicket is hardly responsible for the headers, that come with your
(static) images. I'm sorry, I can't help you here, I've very little
experience configuring apache, nor the connector - mod_jk2.
I understood that, thanks alot, I'll investigate, still, you've
mentioned t
redirectToInterceptPage() should only really be used in the checkAccess() page
If you want to return to a page. Why not give the page that is Editing
the Shipping address the page instance where it came from and where he
should return to?
so youre link click:
setResponsePage(new MyPage(this));
do you really want that seperating also in the html?
(with all those spans?)
Looking at youre example and guessing what the smartform (and the button in it does)
IT is the same, the smart form is just the holder of the components just as i said my List object inside a button would be.
It is just
Hi. Wicket is hardly responsible for the headers, that come with your
(static) images. I'm sorry, I can't help you here, I've very little
experience configuring apache, nor the connector - mod_jk2.
Good luck.
-Matej
Dorel Vaida wrote:
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi.
What does wicket have with the
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi.
What does wicket have with the image? It isn't served by wicket, is it?
Agree, unfortunately the only thing that changed from the other web
applications deliverred by the same server and this one is ... the web
framework used. It is wicket, instead of struts or anythi
No, he is not using resource reference. The site worked, just a while
ago. The image was a static image, served by the http server, just
without the right headers.
-Matej
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
The online page throws an exception.
Are you using a resource reference(!) and not a plain resou
The online page throws an exception.
Are you using a resource reference(!) and not a plain resource? Check
out PackagedResourceReference.
Juergen
On 11/17/05, Dorel Vaida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all, I've deployed my first application with wicket. However, I have
> a BIG annoying performa
Hi.
What does wicket have with the image? It isn't served by wicket, is it?
Check your app server settings, it just seems that it's not sending
right http headers with the image.
Hmm.. Now I see that the server is Apache with mod_jk2.
So check apache configuration.
Adding LastModified header t
I guess redirectToInterceptPage() is not the right method than. E.g.
SignIn2 example is an example use case for this method.
redirectToInterceptPage() in the context of SignIn2 is used to return
(forward) to the original page which the user tried to open, before
Wicket detected that the user must l
Hi all, I've deployed my first application with wicket. However, I have
a BIG annoying performance problem with it, and it is visible just in
production. We have a pretty big picture on the top of the page, a 200k
gif, which is LOADED again and again on every page, it's not cached. On
every oth
A lot of tbd :) I think if you want to compare, there's nothing that
beats taking a look at code. Wicket has e.g. a hangman example and a
component reference (part of wicket-examples); if you take a look at
that code, and maybe try something yourself, you should get a fairly
good idea.
Some of the
Well, the numbers I've sent are rought, I know, I didn't profile it.
It's just a filter that checks how much time does it take to process a
request. The only change between the two numbers was that I switch old
CompoundPropertyModel to new model (called FastCompoundPropertyModel to
distinguis
are you pointing tortoise to the right place? cvsroot
sf.net/cvsroot/wicket-stuff as opposed to
sf.net/cvsroot/wicket-stuff/wicket-stuff ? the latter is for the
wicket-stuff website itself. eclipse, for example, has no problems
listing all the modules when i point it to sf.net/cvsroot/wicket-stuff.
How about the percentage it takes up in comparison of the total
computing for one request? Any other bottlenecks you can identify? Or
was - like Johan said - OGNL one of the biggest hurdles?
Eelco
On 11/17/05, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I took CompoundPropertyModel from 1.2 an
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
Or take the whole CVS issue. We all know that Sourceforge's CVS can get
very annoying. I've been able to download the wicket-contrib modules
that I know about, but I've never been able to get a comprehensive list
of such modules. SF always tells me that the
It would be nice if this thread ended up with some recommendations on
how the (default) form processing itself might be enhanced in order to
support complex validation/ model updating.
Just a note to say that it's okay to send in patches that touch wicket-core :)
Eelco
-
and dont forget irc.freenode.net #wicket
there is usually someone who can answer your question there if you are looking for more of a real time conversation.
-Igor
On 11/17/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> youre "SmartForms" are just what i described as and Array/List inside a
> button
> so that a button knows what to valdate when it gets pressed.
Certainly, it is an attempt to generalize this solution. But you're
not fair when you say that
I currently have a confirmation panel which allows a user to click a
link and go to another page to edit their shipping address, but I want
them to return to the confirmation panel (part of a page) after they
edit their shipping address. So, I added a link to the panel with
its onClick() method sa
OK, thanks for your feedback. We'll try to integrate them soon (better sooner than later).
Martijn
On 11/17/05, Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martijn Dashorst wrote:> But how do we know what kind of documentation to write when we don't> know what you are looking for?I think part of the p
Or take the whole CVS issue. We all know that Sourceforge's CVS can getvery annoying. I've been able to download the wicket-contrib modules
that I know about, but I've never been able to get a comprehensive listof such modules. SF always tells me that the list is not available, butI've never fou
done.
-Igor
On 11/17/05, Christian Essl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 23:50:11 -0800, Igor Vaynberg<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>>
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/wicket-stuff/wicket-contrib-spring/src/java/wicket/contrib/> here i can see the proxy/injection/spring packages, so
Because I want form components to do the validation, not the model.
I want the form code to be as close to an ordinary wicket form as
possible. That means that components themselves do the validation, not
the model.
If I used the default process button, the action (like showing "Choose"
scree
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
But how do we know what kind of documentation to write when we don't
know what you are looking for?
I think part of the problem is that the documentation is not as easily
found as I for one would like. For instance, from the front page of the
Wicket site, if I want to
why use a non default process button? (immediate?)
If you have a in between model then all youre buttons can just be normal once that just doe simple validation (or non)
to the in between model
Then have one (or more) buttons that knows about that in between model
And if that button is pressed it c
Okay, so if I understand you correctly, you suggest changing default
form processing like this?
- immediate button submitted:
validate();
if (hasError(); {
markFormComponentsInvalid();
onError();
}
updateFormComponentsFakeModel();
// this is executed
youre "SmartForms" are just what i described as and Array/List inside a button
so that a button knows what to valdate when it gets pressed.
On 11/17/05, Laurent PETIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks a lot for having sent the source code.I'll check it ASAP (but not before next week, I fear), becau
it is not really a "model" in what you normally call a model.
Now you are holding everything in those attributes
What is then then? That is also a model but integrated into the form'
I find that a bit uglier..
What kind of validation/feedback issues would you have?
I don;t think anything will real
Thanks a lot for having sent the source code.
I'll check it ASAP (but not before next week, I fear), because I'm
*very* interested in encapsulating the behaviour you're talking about
in a reusable package.
I already have some ideas under the cover, but I'm far to having good
knowledges of Wicket i
I don't really know if it's up to date, but you could check
http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/For_Tapestry_Users
in the Wicket wiki
Marco
Detlef Schulze wrote:
Sorry, should read: "tapestry and wicket or wicket and WebObjects" of
course ...
-Original Message-
*Fr
Tnx for clariffying that, im using the CVS version currently, but I
could check if it works with 1.1. But I find it far more likely that "I"
am overlooking some small thing...
I'll will reexamine my code.
is there any example which uses this, or a simple peice of code example
I could check?
M
Very very nice!
then what i did see in the profiler also is very real in the real world!
And there is also another factor that you will only really see if the load is high..
and that is that there is also the same factor how many memory is gc'ed!
johan
On 11/17/05, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Well, having to do validation in model seems like a step backwards from
what I have now. There are already validators that can be attached to
objects, no to mention, that I would have issues with feedback, etc.
I still don't think layered model is a way to go. Currently, I have a
solution, tha
Title: Message
Sorry,
should read: "tapestry and wicket or wicket and WebObjects" of course
...
-Original Message-From: Detlef Schulze
Sent: Donnerstag, 17. November 2005 12:59To:
wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: [Wicket-user] Wicket for
tapestry users
Hi,
Well, it's little more complicated. FeedbackPanel doesn't use the filter
directly. It uses FeedbackMessagesModel to feed the ListView, and that
model uses the Filter.
Nevertheless, overriding getFeedbackMessageFilter worked well for me.
Which version of wicket are you using? I'm using 1.1 and
Title: Message
Hi,
the
last projects I was involved I implemented with tapestry.
I am
of the opinion that it is important (and interesting) to check once in a
while what the "competitors" are doing ;-)
So the
question is: Is anybody aware of some online resources where tapestry and wi
I thought I did that:
//in constructor, where fc is the desired component
filter = new ComponentFeedbackMessageFilter(fc);
and
protected IFeedbackMessageFilter getFeedbackMessageFilter()
{
return filter;
}
I copied this method from FormComponentFeedbackIndicator where it seems
to w
But how do we know what kind of documentation to write when we don't know what you are looking for?
Component reference is there. Wiki contains several good docs on the
inner workings, spring, hibernate, creating custom components.
If you and other users to be don't ask for specific documentation
Okay, I took CompoundPropertyModel from 1.2 and put it to my project, so
that I can directly compare CompoundPropertyModel from 1.1 and 1.2. And
Johan, you are going to like the result :) It's pretty impressive.
On one page (with DataView - 7 columns and 10 rows), the rendering with
old Compo
Of course it is possible. Just override getFeedbackMessageFilter on it
and provide your own message filter.
-Matej
Marco van de Haar wrote:
Does anyone know if it is at least possible to make a custom
FeedbackPanel which displays messages only for a specific component?
I want to make an exte
I can not test it right now, but it should work.
Besides
file.ro_RO.properties => file_ro_RO.properties
Juergen
On 11/17/05, Dorel Vaida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm developing a localized web application, where the use can change the
> language he wants the content to be displayed. However,
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 23:50:11 -0800, Igor Vaynberg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/wicket-stuff/wicket-contrib-spring/src/java/wicket/contrib/
here i can see the proxy/injection/spring packages, so its up to date.
Thanks now I can also check it out.
One final
Okay, I understand. Actually, I don't really want OGNL
CompoundPropertyModel to be replaced. I just want to have the
possibility of non-ognl compound property model in 1.1. So maybe It
could be added to wicket-extensions?
-Matej
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I'd rather finalize 1.2 sooner, cutting
Yeah, partially you are just seeing my frustration at the framework
evaluation process. I know struts backwards and forwards, but the
deficiencies of that framework are all too well known. The same goes
for webwork. I really want to use a component based framework, but
echo/echo2 just doesn't have
Does anyone know if it is at least possible to make a custom
FeedbackPanel which displays messages only for a specific component?
I want to make an extended FeedbackPanel which only shows messages for
Component fc.
See code below. But when I display my panel I see the feedbackmessages
for ALL
I'm developing a localized web application, where the use can change the
language he wants the content to be displayed. However, if the localized
message doesn't exist in the currently locale file (e.g.
file.ro_RO.properties) wicket will not fall back to the default
localized message which is i
69 matches
Mail list logo
