Re: [Wicket-user] Reverting the constructor change of 2.0

2007-03-10 Thread Matej Knopp
c) as well, except I don't think it's that good idea to release a beta before that. It certainly ain't beta if we expect the code to change that significantly. So imho either call it alpha or release it afterwards we commit the changes. -Matej Eelco Hillenius wrote: Hi, It looks like the

Re: [Wicket-user] Reverting the constructor change of 2.0

2007-03-10 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
I didn't have much time in the recent to actually work on apps based on Wicket, neither 1.x not 2.x. Thus I have no experience wih either and no preference regarding the constructor change. I go with what the experts decide. In 2.x there two more changes which have not yet been backported into

Re: [Wicket-user] Reverting the constructor change of 2.0

2007-03-10 Thread Wilko Hische
Hi I am not a committer so I can't really estimate the feasibility of the various scenarios, but I'd prefer C as it sounds like the fastest road to a stable release including generics. Cheers, Wilko Eelco Hillenius wrote: Hi, It looks like the discussion around reverting the

Re: [Wicket-user] Reverting the constructor change of 2.0

2007-03-10 Thread RĂ¼diger Schulz
Hello, as a purse user of Wicket 1.2, I would like to see option c) happen. I'm really looking forward on upgrading my current app to use some of the new features, and to do things more elegantly. Also, I'd like to see Generics support as soon as possible; IModel makes so much more sense with

Re: [Wicket-user] Question about DataGridView

2007-03-10 Thread blackboy zabaha
Hi, - OK, I will red it clearly *[Wicket-user] Design questions: Use of controllers and wicket models * * *- there should be a method on Item like getIndex() ICellPopulator#populateItem(Item cellItem, String componentId, IModel rowModel) but it is cellItem it return index of column, not index

Re: [Wicket-user] AJAX validation

2007-03-10 Thread Arnout Engelen
Jean-Baptiste Quenot schreef: * Arnout Engelen: So far it seems either Apache2, mod_caucho or Resin (2.1.16) is eating the POST body parameters. Has anyone ever seen something like this? Any idea where to look? Is POST followed by a redirect? Yes, the response to the POST is a

[Wicket-user] Instructions for using WICKET-126

2007-03-10 Thread Matt Welch
Currently my development environment is downright ugly when it comes the edit - test changes cycle. I'm using: Maven Jetty plugin Intellij Idea As it currently stands, here's my cycle: 1. Make a change (doesn't matter if it's to a template or page class) 2. Wait for the entire application

Re: [Wicket-user] Instructions for using WICKET-126

2007-03-10 Thread Martijn Dashorst
Not using IDEA I can only comment on the Java stuff. Wicket doesn't impose any special thing on the server and runtime environment. Therefore hotswap should be functioning. My experience with Eclipse is that running the application in debug mode allows hotswap to occur, and typically doesn't

Re: [Wicket-user] Instructions for using WICKET-126

2007-03-10 Thread Eelco Hillenius
Second, I ran across the JIRA issue, WICKET-126: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-126 This seems to describe some changes in the 1.3 base that would enable much easier hot-redeployment of classes. The discussion in the issue went back and forth, but it's a little hard to tell

Re: [Wicket-user] AJAX validation

2007-03-10 Thread Igor Vaynberg
this bug has been fixed in 1.2.5. what problems did you have in 1.2.5? most of them have been fixed and you can build the branch yourself until we release 1.2.6 -igor On 3/10/07, Arnout Engelen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean-Baptiste Quenot schreef: * Arnout Engelen: So far it seems either

Re: [Wicket-user] What's the best way of doing menus in Wicket?

2007-03-10 Thread Alex Objelean
The nice part about wicket is that it does not limit your presentation skills. Regarding menu, the best menu for me by now is a jQuery plugin wrote by Jonathan Sharp: http://jdsharp.us/code/jQuery/plugins/jdMenu . It uses a simple ul-li markup, supports unlimited levels and is completely

Re: [Wicket-user] Instructions for using WICKET-126

2007-03-10 Thread Jean-Baptiste Quenot
* Matt Welch: Hello Matt, Second, I ran across the JIRA issue, WICKET-126: This seems to describe some changes in the 1.3 base that would enable much easier hot-redeployment of classes. That's right, with this new feature you don't need to restart your webapp in most cases. The

[Wicket-user] Property file substitution

2007-03-10 Thread Jonathan Cone
Is it possible to substitute properties into other properties? I tried the Ant-like syntax: Page1.properties: my.label=My homepage my.other.label=${my.label} is neat. Is there a syntax which would render my.other.label as 'My homepage is neat.'? -- View this message in context:

Re: [Wicket-user] Instructions for using WICKET-126

2007-03-10 Thread Matt Welch
Thanks for all of the information and links. I'll be diving into this on Monday and I'll reply here with my results. On 3/10/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Matt Welch: Hello Matt, Second, I ran across the JIRA issue, WICKET-126: This seems to describe some changes in

Re: [Wicket-user] Reverting the constructor change of 2.0

2007-03-10 Thread Gwyn Evans
On 10/03/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: a) focus on stabilizing 1.3 first, meanwhile keep supporting 2.0 (though only for bugfixes). 1.4 will be the release with backports of the currently missing 2.0 features, and 1.5 will be 1.4 + the Java 5 features (including generics). b)

Re: [Wicket-user] Property file substitution

2007-03-10 Thread Nick Heudecker
Take a look at StringResourceModel. It should do what you want. On 3/10/07, Jonathan Cone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible to substitute properties into other properties? I tried the Ant-like syntax: Page1.properties: my.label=My homepage my.other.label=${my.label} is neat. Is

Re: [Wicket-user] Property file substitution

2007-03-10 Thread Eelco Hillenius
I don't think we support that. Feel free to open a feature request, though personally, while I see the fun factor, I don't think it is something we can't live about. So, please provide a patch if you care about such a feature :) Eelco On 3/10/07, Jonathan Cone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it

Re: [Wicket-user] Property file substitution

2007-03-10 Thread Nick Heudecker
Oops. I didn't read his email very closely. On 3/11/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think we support that. Feel free to open a feature request, though personally, while I see the fun factor, I don't think it is something we can't live about. So, please provide a patch if