Udora,
I feel profoundly ashamed. Wicket rocks not only because of its design and
features, but mostly because of its motivated team.
You get free software. If it's not enough for you, go patch it, contribute,
make it better. If the docs, examples, tutorials aren't good enough, make it
better.
O
You can find the wicketstuff.org Wiki here:
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/wicket-portlets
Martijn
On 3/19/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have extracted Wicket Portlet support (also known as JSR-168) from
> Wicket core and made it into a wicket stuff pr
Hello All,
Per my requirements, the app that I need to build has to have different flows per client as well as different look and feel, but just a single source. Still there is a problem, since just a client would not give me 100% knowledge, there might be rules per client; such as if "IF client m
We have extracted Wicket Portlet support (also known as JSR-168) from
Wicket core and made it into a wicket stuff project. The reason we
extracted it is because supporting it ourselves is not working. We
don't use portlets ourselves and don't see it happening soon. We'd
rather do a good job than a
Thanks Eelco i discovered i had multiple servlet jars
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
> Which version of the servlet jar do you include? Pre 2.2 maybe? Or
> maybe you have multiple servlet jars?
>
> Eelco
>
>
> On 3/18/07, eznibe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> HI,
>>
>> My problem is that i cant
The support I've received and watched others receive on this list is
way better than any support I have ever paid for. And good clear
questions always provoke well reasoned discussions of the highest
quality here. I am not exaggerating when I say I have learned as much
here as I have from any book.
and to clarify - even if you do need failover and use the store in this
state - the failure will only occur if the node goes down AND user uses a
the backbutton in the browser
-igor
On 3/19/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
if you use sticky sessions and dont need failover it will
if you use sticky sessions and dont need failover it will work in its
current state
if you need failover then the directory where the files are saved needs to
be accessible by the primary and its backup buddy nodes
-igor
On 3/19/07, Weaver, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been half f
I have been half following the development of the 2nd-level cache. How
well will this work in load-balanced environments if at all? We run a
load-balanced environment in BEA 9.2 and it would be required that the
2nd-level cache support this.
Thanks,
-scott
> -Original Message-
> From:
On 3/19/07, Weaver, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it is really not a pool per se (I never write pools anymore). I
> just want one instance of an arbitrary page per user-session (not per
> application). So, the first time the user asks for a page it is created
> for then put onto the ses
Well, it is really not a pool per se (I never write pools anymore). I
just want one instance of an arbitrary page per user-session (not per
application). So, the first time the user asks for a page it is created
for then put onto the session. All subsequent requests for that page
would come from
> I'm betting this is a Wicket 101 question, but I can't seem to find an
> answer on the wiki or in the lists (perhaps my search keywords aren't
> right). During development I'm occasionally putting in some simple debug
> statements into my pages. During execution, those log statements always come
Also a nice writeup on the cocoon list, regarding object pooling:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@cocoon.apache.org/msg48976.html
Martijn
On 3/19/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott,
>
> You touched a 'sensitive' subject, so I expect to see several replies
> here, all saying
The lifecycle page was extremely informative. Thanks. I'm definitely in
"development" mode, although it is a little disconcerting to hear that this
kind of behavior might be so different between modes. It means that I'll
have to frequently switch back and forth between modes to test that things
ar
Scott,
You touched a 'sensitive' subject, so I expect to see several replies
here, all saying the same:
- don't pool your pages!
A singleton page (i.e. pooled page) is not good for your application.
First of all, it will not work in Wicket, as a page instance is
coupled to a session and pagemap
you could pool pages in a session if you want yes.
Don't pool them over multiply sessions. That could even for pretty static
pages go very wrong.
But i don't know if this is really usefull, how many pages are we talking
about?
Are pages really reused multiply times over the same session?
johan
I was curious to what the best practices and approaches for using single
instances of pages? Certain pages in my application never really change
in content or when they need to, are changed via an event mechanism so I
see no need (actually it is a disadvantage) to create a new page every
time link
Ok I already found out that you need to register a handler also, so
the registry in application becomes:
getPageSettings().addComponentResolver(new EnclosureResolver());
getMarkupSettings().setMarkupParserFactory(new
MarkupParserFactory() {
Hi,
I'm trying to use the wicket:eclosure tag in my application, I am
using a 2.0 snapshot. I've added
"getPageSettings().addComponentResolver(new EnclosureResolver());" to
my application init as instructed in the javadoc, however I still get
the following trace:
java.text.ParseException: Unkown
Depending on where you have your log file messages and what kind they are,
they can appear more than once as sometimes components are winded up more
than once (e.g: inner redirect...) - best answer might be this:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/lifecycle-of-a-wicket-application.html where
the whole
What rendering strategy do you use? Redirect to buffer should only
trigger a page once.
Also, if your links do some javascript stuff, you should ensure that
you return false in the onclick handler (if you do the callback
there), otherwise the browser will send 2 requests.
Martijn
On 3/19/07, Mat
I'm betting this is a Wicket 101 question, but I can't seem to find an
answer on the wiki or in the lists (perhaps my search keywords aren't
right). During development I'm occasionally putting in some simple debug
statements into my pages. During execution, those log statements always come
up twic
i wasnt in a bad mood when i wrote that. i dont generally drink coffee and i
had plenty of sex the night before. i said what needed to be said, and i
hope you were smart enough to get the most important message which was "help
us help you".
-igor
On 3/19/07, Udora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
H
you can deduce the path by looking at the markup the datatable uses.
-igor
On 3/15/07, Daniele Dellafiore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi. I am trying to make a test to check the content of a DataTable
that is in a WebPage.
I can get the table with page.get("table");
where "table" is of course
Yeah, this would be quite an elegant solution, if we can implement
that properly.
On 3/19/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So pages should have a special serialization mechanism?
>
> When they are not the top component when serializing they do a
> replaceObject() ?
> (with the page
So pages should have a special serialization mechanism?
When they are not the top component when serializing they do a
replaceObject() ?
(with the pagemap:id string)
So when you are reading it back in. We get the page from the pagemap itself
(and deserialize it)
So that we always have one page f
Okay, take this scenario:
Using second level sessionstore, with multiwindow support off (default).
You open two pages in two different tab. By default they are in same
(default) pagemap. In one of the window, you have modal window with a
page. The page inside modal window is in it's own pagemap, a
What do you mean lose all changes to the page?
On 3/19/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I guess it should work then. Still, it seems to be quite fragile
solution to me. Because as soon as the original page moves to disk
(e.g. in another tab you visit another page in that pagema
Okay, I can confirm setting the pagemap works (but only with most
recent version of wicket). Anyway, the fragility is still there I'm
afraid.
On 3/19/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I guess it should work then. Still, it seems to be quite fragile
> solution to me. Because as soo
Well, I guess it should work then. Still, it seems to be quite fragile
solution to me. Because as soon as the original page moves to disk
(e.g. in another tab you visit another page in that pagemap) you lose
all changes to the page.
On 3/19/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yes ev
yes every pagemap has an active page.
On 3/19/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Will that work for secondlevelcachesessionstore as well? If so, it
should only be matter of calling
modalWindow.setPageMapName("myWindowPageMap");
-Matej
On 3/19/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Will that work for secondlevelcachesessionstore as well? If so, it
should only be matter of calling
modalWindow.setPageMapName("myWindowPageMap");
-Matej
On 3/19/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> different pagemaps?
>
>
>
> On 3/19/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes
Ok, I'll check it in more detail and submit an issue if neccesary, thanks.
Jaime.
Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I haven't investigated this, but did
you come further with this? If
you think it is a bug, please open a JIRA issue for it.
Eelco
On 3/15/07, Jaime De La Jara wrote:
>
different pagemaps?
On 3/19/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes. Two active pages. He passes reference from one page to another.
The other page modifies the reference. But he doesn't return to the
previous page using setResponsePage(). That would work, but this is
not the case. Beca
Yes. Two active pages. He passes reference from one page to another.
The other page modifies the reference. But he doesn't return to the
previous page using setResponsePage(). That would work, but this is
not the case. Because here the other page is in an iframe of the first
page. As far as I know
But. There is bigger problem than this. The problem with two different
instances of one page. I don't see easy solution for this. Normally,
this is not an issue, because if you keep page instance, you usually
call setResposnePage(instance) to get to it. However, this is not the
case with modal win
At the moment you click the button.
Other things like images that where being streamed to the client are cut of
by the browser
and then those broken streams could appear in the log.
We do handle some of them (depending of the container impl) to silently
ignore them
johan
On 3/19/07, ChuckDeal <
Johan Compagner wrote:
>
> Those exceptions do happen when the browser terminates the connection
> So if you do an ajax request and then press the stop button? Or click on
> another link when
> the ajax request is still happening?
> Then the browser will close the connection and then you get tha
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
>
> But. There is bigger problem than this. The problem with two different
> instances of one page. I don't see easy solution for this. Normally,
> this is not an issue, because if you keep page instance, you usually
> call setResposnePage(instance) to get to it. However, th
Hi Udora,
I disagree with these comments, especially with the arrogance label you're
putting on the Wicket developers. On the contrary, IMHO, they're one of the
most humble in the open source space. As an example go to theserverside
archives and go read some of the comments by them in some of the
Let's back up here a minute.
First off, you are a thankless idiot for thinking that these guys
doing open source software, to your benefit, with absolutely no
compensation from you, are anything like the relationship you have
with your clients. Do you work for free for your clients? No, I
Hi Udora,
I have been lurking this list for a few months now and I am really amazed by
the speed and helpfulness that questions are answered (check it for yourself
at http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-f13974.html). The few questions I posed when
i was feeling my way around the framework were all answe
Hi Igor,
First of all, I would want to say that I've solved the problem myself and
having now a great table component with all what I needed.
And I also want to say that I don't think I owe you as a developer anything
for using Wicket. Of course being an open source developer, you have the
luxury
Issue created.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-405
Thank you.
Matthew
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
>> Do you mind if I send you that application through Email attachment?
>> Since I
>> am afraid I can't explain well in English.
>> The expiration problem still exists after logging int
Which version of the servlet jar do you include? Pre 2.2 maybe? Or
maybe you have multiple servlet jars?
Eelco
On 3/18/07, eznibe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> My problem is that i cant use the quickstart example of wicket because when
> i launch it, throws this error:
>
> I Copy the co
What did you put in as the decoration code? Wicket.Window.get().close(); ?
Eelco
On 3/12/07, Apaar Trivedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hey guys,
>
>
>
> I am trying to automatically close a modal window if an exception occurs
> within its ajax requests or submits.
>
>
>
> For example, i
On 3/15/07, Daniele Dellafiore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi. I am trying to make a test to check the content of a DataTable
> that is in a WebPage.
> I can get the table with page.get("table");
> where "table" is of course the path to my table component in the page.
>
> How can I access a cell i
I haven't investigated this, but did you come further with this? If
you think it is a bug, please open a JIRA issue for it.
Eelco
On 3/15/07, Jaime De La Jara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm using the FileUpload component and set the maxSize property to
> 150Kb, I've
> found that when the up
> Do you mind if I send you that application through Email attachment? Since I
> am afraid I can't explain well in English.
> The expiration problem still exists after logging into the application from
> a stateless form with a redirect(true).
In that case, the best way is to open up an issue in J
49 matches
Mail list logo
