component.
I haven't used it so much though.. and the examples Igor shows are
pretty scary.
3) If we would ever backtrack on the constructor change (*if*, don't
panic for now) how much trouble would that give you?
I'm not writing applications with W2, so it'd cause no troubles ;-)
--
Filippo
general question) how do you test that all wicket:messages
are rendered correctly?
Thanks
--
Filippo Diotalevi
http://www.diotalevi.com
http://www.jugmilano.it
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join
On 3/7/07, Dmitry Kandalov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To use application properties I extend WicketTester and have this in
constructor:
[CUT]
Thanks Dmitry I'll give it a try
--
Filippo Diotalevi
http://www.diotalevi.com
http://www.jugmilano.it
fine, but I have all the exceptions I reported before in the log.
--
Filippo Diotalevi
http://www.diotalevi.com
http://www.jugmilano.it
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel
On 3/4/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, you're using Wicket 1.2.5?
Yes, Wicket 1.2.5
--
Filippo Diotalevi
http://www.diotalevi.com
http://www.jugmilano.it
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence
of tests?
--
Filippo Diotalevi
http://www.diotalevi.com
http://www.jugmilano.it
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions
, but not compatible with the
upcoming Wicket 2.0.
--
Filippo Diotalevi
http://www.diotalevi.com
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
On 2/13/07, Iulian Costan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey Filippo,
yes, i've been thinking for a while to release 1.0 version but couldnt make
it till now. yes, please do it, if you are kind enough to help me, that will
be great. as well pom files need little clean up as well, but that's another
...
what do you think of releasing an official jar?
I can do that, if Iulian has no time/interest , and if you think the
library is stable.
WDYT?
--
Filippo Diotalevi
http://www.diotalevi.com
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more
better than my previous
quick-and-ugly design.
--
Filippo Diotalevi
http://www.diotalevi.com
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology
-javaee
--
Filippo Diotalevi
http://www.diotalevi.com
http://www.jugmilano.it
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions
On 1/20/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just filed http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-227, which we
are considering because of an offline discussion we had on how to cut
down on maintenance for the core projects.
[]
* wicket-contrib-beanpanels (create examples from
On 1/20/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/20/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand the whole issue: the idea is to move
wicket-stuff outside of Sourceforge? Why is the provided URL just
an ip address?
Yeah, I ported quite all the contents of
On 1/16/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, ok. In that case, you should move the project from trunk to the 1.3
branch in the wicket-stuff project. Trunk is reserved for 2.0 projects. I
regularly update those projects (like last weekend) when there are API
breaks.
Hi, I moved the
On 1/16/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Definitively not the easiest task! Cool you are picking it up; I'll be sure
to give it a look every now and then :)
Will it be 2.0 only?
Hi Eelco, no, we're developing with Wicket 1.X. And we are on heavy
development right now, so expect *a
On 1/14/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
add(new Label(foo, new ResourceModel(header))) ?
Yeah, it was really that simple!
Thanks
--
filippo
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join
On 1/9/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, we can't use Apache's infrastructure for wicket-stuff. However,
we have a couple of servers available that are not related to Apache I
believe.
Eelco
Eelco,
are there any news with this regard?
--
Filippo Diotalevi
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 1/11/07, Nick Heudecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Confluence is setup here: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/
Sorry guys... I don't get it.
You've said in another thread that we cannot use apache infrastructure
for wicket-stuff.. right?
So, if I understand well, that instance of confluence you
On 1/11/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://81.17.46.170:8090/confluence
sign up for an account and i will grant you permissions
Great Job igor!
I've just signed up with the account 'fdiotalevi'
--
Filippo Diotalevi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog
http
On 1/11/07, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, on second thought, there is hardly anything in the sf issue tracker
for wicket-stuff, so there wouldn't be any migration issues. I didn't
realize Jira could be part of the package. If others agree, and it wouldn't
be to difficult for
from the website the pages in the wiki.
Quite simple.
--
Filippo Diotalevi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog
http://www.jugmilano.it
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's
On 1/11/07, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cant you force confluence to just extend the basic template? - e.g: only
have a manipulatable sub-part in the main-template similar to what you do in
CMS like typo3 ?
I don't think so. Templates are page templates, so you can create some
On 1/11/07, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm with Filippo.
+1 for one wiki, one web site. Let's keep it real simple off the bat and not
create any administrative headaches. Most projects have only one maintainer,
and there are no separate mailing lists. We should be able to evolve
-stuff.sourceforge.net/wiki-stuff/WicketStuffWikiHome)
but it is very simple and open to spammers, so I don't know if we
should put too much effort in it or look for another platform.
what do you think?
--
Filippo Diotalevi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog
http://www.jugmilano.it
love it! but we've
already discussed about it and I remember some folks being not very
enthusiastic about this solution
--
Filippo Diotalevi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog
http://www.jugmilano.it
-
Take
'workspaces', so you need just
one license to create different wikis.
If there's already confluence installation for wicket, I'd go with it,
and I'd be happy to maintain it.
--
Filippo Diotalevi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog
http://www.jugmilano.it
it's easy or not
to backport this module to the wicket1.x branch; if someone is
interested in using java ee with wicket 1.x, just let me know and I'll
spend some time on this task.
--
Filippo Diotalevi
http://www.diotalevi.com
, I thought it
would be useful to extend this functionality to wicket pages, in the
same way we have @SpringBean annotation for injecting spring beans.
--
Filippo Diotalevi
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future
On 12/28/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lets not forget the important part, assuming the ejb thing works just like
wicket-spring. things injected are actually proxies not beans themselves.
Yes Igor, I've used the same technique you adopted in the Wicket
Spring integration. Things
On 12/20/06, Filippo Diotalevi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/20/06, Ayodeji Aladejebi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How easy will it be to take advantage of container resource injection when
deploying wicket as client tier in glassfish server for instance.
Hi Ayodeji, as Igor has already
On 12/22/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we going to add this to core or as a wicket-stuff project?
On 12/22/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But who is going to maintain it then? Adding stuff to our core is good
and all, but it needs to be maintained.
On 12/20/06, Paolo Di Tommaso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's sound interesting. Is that old code still available somewhere?
If you agree we could create a new wicket-stuff project starting from it.
Thanks, Paolo
Hi Paolo,
I'm interested too in re-creating such a component in
On 12/20/06, Paolo Di Tommaso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good question.
I've found the BeanFormPanel source in a old 1.1.1 wicket-extensions
release.
If the project bean-edit is missing I could start it again together with
Filippo.
Yes!
I've just done a quick check and the latest
On 12/20/06, Paolo Di Tommaso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, but it is possible to commit on wicket-stuff with an anonymous access?
Paolo
Not with an anonymous access, but I should also have commit access
since I'm listed as 'developer' in wicket-stuff
--
filippo
this
functionality.
--
Filippo Diotalevi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog
http://www.jugmilano.it
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
On 12/20/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
take a look at @SpringBean, it would be trivial to extend the base clases to
create an @EjbBean or some such to inject directly into components, all you
need is to implement IFieldValueFactory to do that
Yes... the @EJB annotation support,
On 12/11/06, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey wicket users,
Just wanted to let everyone know I just released the first version of the
wicket-contrib-scriptaculous project. It's based on wicket-2.0, so it might
not work for everyone, but give it a try if your interested!
On 11/22/06, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great. I'm thinking maybe we need a second ProjectStatus page, since I
believe the amount of status info is going to grow. This would have info
such as Notes, Current Versions, Maven support, and possibly a TODO list
for each project. Or
if:
- a project has been discontinued
- a project is up-to-date with current Wicket release
- a project is Wicket 1.3-ready
- a project is Wicket 2.0-ready
--
Filippo Diotalevi
http://www.diotalevi.com
-
Take Surveys. Earn
On 11/22/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest making the wiki the main documentation page. The maven
doc generation needs some understanding and not many have the time to
learn it.
+1 for the wiki... there are a lot of projects in wicket-stuff, and it
would be
On 11/22/06, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't we set up a space for wicket-stuff which content we don't
attribute to the ASF, but provide as a documentation ground for the
wicket-stuff project?
I'd rather have the documentation together in one place than scattered
across the
On 11/21/06, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Korbinian,
I'm a bit time constrained also, but if you take the lead I will help you
out.
If you want to enlarge the team with a third person, you can count on
me as well (as assistant, I am also quite busy...)
--
Filippo Diotalevi
On 11/21/06, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've take a brief look at all the wicket-stuff projects, and here are some
things I think need to be done.
Well done. However, i think it will be difficult to keep track of this
discussion in the mailing list.
Can we use a wiki instead? For
On 11/21/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you give me the sourceforge ids you want to use for this, I'll be
happy to add you guys.
My sourceforge id is fdiotalevi
--
Filippo Diotalevi
http://www.diotalevi.com
44 matches
Mail list logo
