On 1/9/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, James, Korbinian and Filippo... any plans of creating some > releases (see > http://www.nabble.com/who-wants-to-be-in-charge-of-doing-wicket-stuff-releases-tf2665134.html)?
Yes... and we really need to setup a new site for wicket-stuff.... now it's so outdated that most of the subprojects of wicket-stuff aren't even documented in the website. And if we don't have a decent website, it's very difficult to keep track of the things to do. The problem is that there are so many people involved in wicket-stuff that it's nearly impossible to reach them all and make a "democratic" decision about the future of the website. In my opinion, we should drop the current website and use a wiki instead. It's the only simple way to manage the complexity of having so many projects, contributors and releases. We already have a wiki (http://wicket-stuff.sourceforge.net/wiki-stuff/WicketStuffWikiHome) but it is very simple and open to spammers, so I don't know if we should put too much effort in it or look for another platform. what do you think? -- Filippo Diotalevi [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.diotalevi.com/weblog http://www.jugmilano.it ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
