I also had hair-pulling moments at first trying to understand static vs.
dynamic models. It was one of my principal motivations for re-writing
the wiki page.
Scott Swank wrote:
>
> Read it? I have it printed off & sitting on my desk. The key point I was
> missing was that a static model for,
I use the WTP html editor.
Joni Freeman wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 18:17 -0800, Loren Rosen wrote:
>> Yes, I can create a patch. It's a one-line change (well, two lines if you
>> count changing
>> the class imports).
>>
>> (The
ation example and then modified.)
I'd be happy to work on the plug-in. I need to refresh my plug-in writing
skills anyway.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> On 1/25/07, Loren Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Now the installation instructions say to set an explicit
I've got a wicket-bench question which I'll ask here since the wicket-bench
mailing
list seems moribund.
If you don't set a default html editor, what should happen in the html tab
of a wicket-bench
editor window? What I get is what appears to be a bastardized java editor
which behaves
inappropria
the wiki is versioned i think so we can
> always
> roll back.
>
> when you are done with the majority let us know and we will review the
> changes.
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 1/15/07, Loren Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> When I first st
The wiki has an example of how to write this kind of validator:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/validating-related-fields.html
Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> message. In other words I can not use the build in valdiation by itself
>> since all those fi
>the StringResourceModel pulls the
>data, where as if you do new Model(getLocalizer()..) the value will never
>change.
This reinforces my thinking that the page needs to discuss dynamic vs.
static models.
>StringResourceModel also uses the localizer of the component it is attached
>to, so depe
t; when you are done with the majority let us know and we will review the
> changes.
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 1/15/07, Loren Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> When I first started using Wicket I found the information on models a
>> little
>&
When I first started using Wicket I found the information on models a little
hard to follow. So now I'd like to revise the "Working with Wicket models"
wiki page
(http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Working+with+Wicket+models)
to improve this. I'd be happy to outline what I think sh
I'm writing this up as a 'how-to' topic for the wiki, and I've got a few
questions.
First, assuming the addCookie call is inside something inheriting from
WebPage, it seems
you need to first call getWebRequestCycle in order to get the WebRequest and
WebResponse:
getWebRequestCycle().getWebRes
I've added a brief entry in the FAQ page on the wiki
(http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/FAQs)
Loren
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>
> This would make a fine entry for a FAQ (which we don't have yet?) on
> the WIKI. Any volunteers?
>
> Eelco
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
11 matches
Mail list logo