and here is a small prototype i worked on for wicket 2.0
dont know if the code is complete but it might give you some ideas
-igor
On 12/20/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/19/06, Ayodeji Aladejebi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this is not so difficult to do on a base level
On 12/19/06, Ayodeji Aladejebi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this is not so difficult to do on a base level in wicket...it just
> that i wished the wicket committers could work on a very robust
> infastructure for this because really we eventually get tired of
> typing textfields for each property i
Added
On 20/12/06, Paolo Di Tommaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fine, my id on sourceforge is "paolodt" .
>
> Thanks.
>
> Paolo
>
>
> On 12/20/06, Martijn Dashorst < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you provide me with your sourceforge.net ID, then I'll add
> > you to the committers list of wicke
Fine, my id on sourceforge is "paolodt" .
Thanks.
Paolo
On 12/20/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you provide me with your sourceforge.net ID, then I'll add
you to the committers list of wicket-stuff
-
If you provide me with your sourceforge.net ID, then I'll add
you to the committers list of wicket-stuff
On 12/20/06, Paolo Di Tommaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice one. How to gain 'developer' access to that project ?
>
> Paolo
>
>
> On 12/20/06, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > I'v
Nice one. How to gain 'developer' access to that project ?
Paolo
On 12/20/06, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've just committed a copy of the project that I had locally back to
SVN, but it's not something I was working on, so may be older than the
last modified one. Feel free to delet
I've just committed a copy of the project that I had locally back to
SVN, but it's not something I was working on, so may be older than the
last modified one. Feel free to delete it if it doesn't help.
/Gwyn
On 20/12/06, Paolo Di Tommaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you grant the same role t
Can you grant the same role to me or whoever else can do that?
Paolo
On 12/20/06, Filippo Diotalevi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/20/06, Paolo Di Tommaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, but it is possible to commit on wicket-stuff with an anonymous
access?
>
> Paolo
Not with an anonymou
On 12/20/06, Paolo Di Tommaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, but it is possible to commit on wicket-stuff with an anonymous access?
>
> Paolo
Not with an anonymous access, but I should also have commit access
since I'm listed as 'developer' in wicket-stuff
--
filippo
No, but if you provide me with your sourceforge.net ID, then I'll add
you to the committers list.
Martijn
On 12/20/06, Paolo Di Tommaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, but it is possible to commit on wicket-stuff with an anonymous access?
>
> Paolo
>
> On 12/20/06, Filippo Diotalevi < [EMAIL PRO
Ok, but it is possible to commit on wicket-stuff with an anonymous access?
Paolo
On 12/20/06, Filippo Diotalevi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/20/06, Paolo Di Tommaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good question.
>
> I've found the BeanFormPanel source in a old 1.1.1 wicket-extensions
> releas
On 12/20/06, Paolo Di Tommaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good question.
>
> I've found the BeanFormPanel source in a old 1.1.1 wicket-extensions
> release.
>
> If the project bean-edit is missing I could start it again together with
> Filippo.
Yes!
I've just done a quick check and the latest wic
Good question.
I've found the BeanFormPanel source in a old 1.1.1 wicket-extensions
release.
If the project bean-edit is missing I could start it again together with
Filippo.
Paolo
On 12/20/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Strange...
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wicket-st
Strange...
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wicket-stuff.html
Mentions a bean edit project, but I can't find it on the SVN
repository. Any one know what happened to it?
Martijn
On 12/20/06, Filippo Diotalevi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/20/06, Paolo Di Tommaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On 12/20/06, Paolo Di Tommaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's sound interesting. Is that old code still available somewhere?
>
> If you agree we could create a new wicket-stuff project starting from it.
> Thanks, Paolo
Hi Paolo,
I'm interested too in re-creating such a component in
wicket-st
Also, check the wicket-contrib-.*bean.* project in Wicket Stuff. It
hasn't been maintained very well, but could be used as a starting
point
Martijn
On 12/20/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> im not sure, check svn history? dont remember if it was removed before or
> after our move to
im not sure, check svn history? dont remember if it was removed before or
after our move to svn.
-igor
On 12/20/06, Paolo Di Tommaso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's sound interesting. Is that old code still available somewhere?
If you agree we could create a new wicket-stuff project starti
That's sound interesting. Is that old code still available somewhere?
If you agree we could create a new wicket-stuff project starting from it.
Thanks, Paolo
On 12/19/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
we dropped it from extensions because there was not enough interest in it
and
we dropped it from extensions because there was not enough interest in it
and it was a pita to maintain. if there is interest now then you guys can
feel free to start a wicket-stuff project, once it has evolved there to
something useful we wouldnt mind readding it to extensions.
-igor
On 12/19/
the only thing that actually limits the feature is what has been mentioned.
Styling the generated forms to taste.
On 12/19/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
we dropped it from extensions because there was not enough interest in it
and it was a pita to maintain. if there is interest n
i have a bean panel, and what i do is put the label and the
formcomponent/panel into a border. i have a factory method on the panel that
lets users define their own borders so they can easily change the look and
feel of the panel.
-igor
On 12/19/06, Ayodeji Aladejebi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:19:47 +0800
From: "Carfield Yim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Wicket-user] Directly map a bean to HTML form
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; c
0
From: "Carfield Yim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Wicket-user] Directly map a bean to HTML form
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
This look really cool, I just define the bean an
this is not so difficult to do on a base level in wicket...it just
that i wished the wicket committers could work on a very robust
infastructure for this because really we eventually get tired of
typing textfields for each property in various beans. there used to be
bean panel in wicket but sudden
Quite interesting.
Although Wicket use a different approach that requires explicitly to map
html fields to java objects - and this is what makes it so great - there are
situation where would be very useful to have a component like that (for
example for fast application prototyping ..).
Moreover
This look really cool, I just define the bean and the framework
determine HTML input type for me, is that similar support from wicket
for this?
http://beanform.sourceforge.net/
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future
26 matches
Mail list logo