On Thursday 03 May 2007 6:30 pm, Igor Vaynberg escreveu:
hrm. i would consider that a bug i think. i dont see why it would get
called before constructor. can you set a breakpoint in there and paste the
stacktrace please.
I'm still using the pre-wicket name change stuff. I can upgrade,
ah, you are just using an old version.
this is the _exact_ problem that chris encountered, and has been fixed a
long time ago.
-igor
On 5/8/07, Thomas R. Corbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 03 May 2007 6:30 pm, Igor Vaynberg escreveu:
hrm. i would consider that a bug i think. i
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 1:06 pm, Igor Vaynberg escreveu:
ah, you are just using an old version.
this is the _exact_ problem that chris encountered, and has been fixed a
long time ago.
Cool, thanks. I'll upgrade.
-igor
On 5/8/07, Thomas R. Corbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
I've got some groovy code which processes an xml file and generates some html.
Right now I do it at build time, but would really prefer to do it at run
time. I've got some code hooked up which does so, but all I get is an empty
page.
I'm using wicket 1.3.0-snapshot (prior to the name
see IMarkupResourceStreamProvider, there is also an example in
wicket-examples that shows custom markup loading.
-igor
On 5/3/07, Thomas R. Corbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got some groovy code which processes an xml file and generates some
html.
Right now I do it at build time, but
On Thursday 03 May 2007 5:05 pm, Igor Vaynberg escreveu:
see IMarkupResourceStreamProvider, there is also an example in
wicket-examples that shows custom markup loading.
Thanks. I think I'll have to go with the build time option because the
getMarkupResourceStream( container,
Sounds like a similar bug I had with overriding getVariation on WebPage.
This is now fixed in 1.2.6. The wicket authors had to rearrange the
ordering of initialization to ensure that my constructor got called
before the call to my overridden getVariation method. It could be that
they may have to
