In the description of the PropertyModel there is an implicit example, that
might as well be spelled out.
personForm.add(new RequiredTextField("personName", new
PropertyModel(person, "name")));
I also changed the id of the field to personName to distinguish it
from the property: name.
On 1/22/
We did already break the model contract with 1.2/1.3... would
get/setObject->get/setValue be a huge hassle? Or am I spacing something
here?
Jonathan Locke wrote:
>
>
> Made a few more changes. I think it's getting shorter/better.
>
> My one regret looking at this documentation is that I
Made a few more changes. I think it's getting shorter/better.
My one regret looking at this documentation is that I wish
IModel.get/setObject were actually IModel.get/setValue. Or was there some
crazy reason we didn't do this? It would be much easier and more natural to
talk about a model's
nice work!
-igor
On 1/22/07, Loren Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've saved my rewritten version. (See
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Working+with+Wicket+models
)
Comments by everyone from experts to complete newbies
are most welcome. Doubtless there are things that ar
Nice work. I made a few small changes and rephrased the first paragraph to
be even more specific. Maybe it could be tweaked a little more, but I think
this sums it up better now:
"In Wicket, a model holds a value for a component to display and/or edit.
How exactly this value is held is determi
Looks great, thanks a lot. I added a few notes about models in Wicket
2.0. If other people have more such notes they would be welcome.
Eelco
On 1/22/07, Loren Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've saved my rewritten version. (See
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Working+wi
I've saved my rewritten version. (See
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Working+with+Wicket+models)
Comments by everyone from experts to complete newbies
are most welcome. Doubtless there are things that are confusing or flat-out
wrong.
In addition to rephrasing or rewriting a lot
On 1/16/07, Loren Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> all models are detachable.
This is true in the sense that they all implement IDetachable. But some
models
don't do anything interesting when detached. It would be nice to be able
to
give some simple direction to developers who have a large mo
>the StringResourceModel pulls the
>data, where as if you do new Model(getLocalizer()..) the value will never
>change.
This reinforces my thinking that the page needs to discuss dynamic vs.
static models.
>StringResourceModel also uses the localizer of the component it is attached
>to, so depe
On 1/16/07, Loren Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm working on this now, and have a few questions:
When would you use StringResourceModel instead of getting a string from
Localizer
and creating a model from that?
the two operations are equivalent, however the StringResourceModel pulls th
I'm working on this now, and have a few questions:
When would you use StringResourceModel instead of getting a string from
Localizer
and creating a model from that?
What's the attach and detach behavior of the property models?
Why does IModel extend IDetachable? One might expect only
AbstractDe
Yeah, go for it. That'll be much appreciated.
Eelco
On 1/15/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
go ahead and edit the page...the wiki is versioned i think so we can
always roll back.
when you are done with the majority let us know and we will review the
changes.
-igor
On 1/15/07,
go ahead and edit the page...the wiki is versioned i think so we can always
roll back.
when you are done with the majority let us know and we will review the
changes.
-igor
On 1/15/07, Loren Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I first started using Wicket I found the information on models
When I first started using Wicket I found the information on models a little
hard to follow. So now I'd like to revise the "Working with Wicket models"
wiki page
(http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Working+with+Wicket+models)
to improve this. I'd be happy to outline what I think sh
14 matches
Mail list logo
