Dear Gavin Abo,
Thank you very much for your help.
I could solve it.
However, I can not have the PostScript format in the w2web. However,
it saves correctly.
Is there any way to have it?
Regards,
Mohaddeseh
On 4/20/18, Gavin Abo wrote:
> There are fixed band.pl and scf.pl files for WIEN2k 17.1
There are fixed band.pl and scf.pl files for WIEN2k 17.1 [1-4] in the
post [1] that you can use (or band.patch and scf.patch [5,6] at [7]
could be used instead).
If you choose to use the patch files. The following is what I do.
First, I go to [7]. I click on band.patch on the webpage, then I
Hi Gavin,
The compilation was done with -O0 option. I guess the problem is something else.
Thanks,
Fhokrul
From: Wien on behalf of Gavin Abo
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 12:26 PM
To: wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
Subject: Re: [Wien] 'LAPW2: semicore
Dear Prof. Blaha and Prof. Laurence,
Thank you very much for the suggestions.
Anup Pradhan Sakhya (Ph.D.)
___
Wien mailing list
Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at
http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien
SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at:
http://
Dear experts,
Hello,
Recently, I have installed WIEN2k version 17.1.
After I installed it successfully, I tried to test it running different
tasks.
Every things went as well. However, I could not do bandstructure
calculations.
In fact, when doing lapw1 -band command, it looks for the file with in
I will second and third Peter's comments about 4f. You also have to worry
about what direction is relevant for the SOC, and whether it should be a
statistical average.
We managed to get decent agreement with experiment in DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.025001 . An unconventional approach, determi
Of course using runsp or runsp_c you will get different solutions.
The 4f systems are very difficult to describe and GGA but also GGA+U or
hybrid-DFT are only crude approximations (another one would be to put a
certain number of 4f electrons into the core ).
So we cannot get "THE correct
Sorry, I don't know which of the 2016/2017/2018 ifort/mkl versions are
more stable as I mentioned before [
https://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/msg16802.html
].
I would probably try the Update 2, Update 4, or try compiling with -O0
as Intel suggested on the webpage:
19.04.2018 12:45, Md. Fhokrul Islam wrote:
I am not sure if the problem is with lapwso. All the output files from
lapw1 and lapwso (case.scf1, case.scfso) look ok to me. But case.scf2
files have only these lines:
TEMP.-SMEARING WITH 0.00500 Ry
-S / Kb = -5.64060
I am not sure if the problem is with lapwso. All the output files from
lapw1 and lapwso (case.scf1, case.scfso) look ok to me.
The scf files look "ok", but you need to check the output1* and
outputso* files.
lapw2 detects that the first eigenvalue on all the k-points has a large
spread, i.e
Dear Prof. Blaha,
Thank you very much for the reply.
Yes I could see that the occupancy in spin up case is 3 and for spin down
is 3. After that as suggested by you I did
x lapwdm -up -so
and x lapwdm -dn -so
Then I checked the case.scfdmup file and I could find the information
about the occu
11 matches
Mail list logo