On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, John Vandenberg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Jodi Schneider
jodi.schnei...@deri.org wrote:
...
[3] Other side-effects might be helping to identify what's highly cited in
Wikipedia (which would be interesting -- and might help prioritize
Wikisource
Jakob writes:
there already *are* communities that collect and share bibliographic data
I would be happy if anyone does what I was describing; no point in
reinventing what already exists. But I have not found it:
I mean a public collection of citations, with reader-editable
commentary and
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Brian J Mingus
brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
I like your suggestion that the abc disambiguator be chosen based on the
first date of publication, and I also like the prospect of using slashes
since they can't be contained in names. Using the full year is a
1) The first three author names separated by slashes
why not separate by pluses? they don't form part of names either, and
don't cause problems with wiki page titles.
I like this... however, how would you represent this in a URL? Also note that
using plusses in page names don't work with all
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Daniel Kinzler dan...@brightbyte.de wrote:
1) The first three author names separated by slashes
why not separate by pluses? they don't form part of names either, and
don't cause problems with wiki page titles.
I like this... however, how would you represent
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Daniel Kinzler dan...@brightbyte.dewrote:
1) The first three author names separated by slashes
why not separate by pluses? they don't form part of names either, and
don't cause problems with wiki page titles.
I like this... however, how would you represent
The model for this is WP:Book sources, though this relies upon the
user selecting the appropriate places to look, rather than guiding
him.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Jodi Schneider jodi.schnei...@deri.org wrote:
On 21 Jul 2010, at 19:47, Brian J Mingus wrote:
Finn,
I'm not a fan of
Sure, but first, is this capable of being done at all? I have never
seen a method of bibliographic control that can cope with the complete
range of publications, even just print publications. Perhaps we need
to proceed within narrow domains.
Second, is this capable of being done by
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 5:47 PM, David Goodman dgoodma...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sure, but first, is this capable of being done at all? I have never
seen a method of bibliographic control that can cope with the complete
range of publications, even just print publications. Perhaps we need
to
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Rob Lanphier ro...@robla.net wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Brian J Mingus
brian.min...@colorado.edu wrote:
I have been working with Sam and others for some time now on
brainstorming a
proposal for the Foundation to create a centralized wiki of
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
Brian,
The meta process for new project proposals is still the cleanest one
for suggesting a specific Project and presenting it alongside similar
projects.
It would be helpful if you could update a related project
Brian J Mingus, 19/07/2010 22:20:
The basic idea is a centralized wiki that contains citation information that
other MediaWikis and WMF projects can then reference using something like a
{{cite}} template or a simple link. The community can document the citation,
the author, the book etc..
Hey folks,
I've been lurking on this list since the beginning of time and saw
this fly by. Thanks Nemo for the shout out. That is pretty much what
Bibdex is about. My inspiration was a Big Hairy Goal to provide a
central place where the body of academic knowledge can be curated by
the public in
13 matches
Mail list logo
