Gerard,
Normally users don't want information about human settlements, but about
municipalities, which may contain several human settlements. Ideally we
should have both and let the user decide what to look for.
Thanks,
Micru
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Gerard Meijssen
Hoi,
A settlement is in the administrative territorial entity of something
higher up.. That could be the municipality.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 11 June 2014 08:35, David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com wrote:
Gerard,
Normally users don't want information about human settlements, but about
Hi, I basically proposed a two layers model in extended discussions :
Administrative units | Administrative unit type | Administrative unit
classes by country
City Of London | City of the UK | Type of administrative
unit of the UK
Lorraine | French Region|
Hoi,
Important to recognise is that there can be as many layers as are needed..
ie a roller coaster can be in a park, a park can be in a settlement, a
settlement in a municipality, a municipality in a county, a county in a
province, a province in a state and finally a state in a country (that is
Hi, Gerard, I don't understand, As needed for what ?
In your example it is enough to retrieve all the territorial entities a
location is in.
But let's say I want to get the administrative territorial organisation of
France (Wikipedias probably ), I mean like france is divided in regions,
regions
Hoi,
A bot run by Amir has remedied many of the issues that resulted from an
import of data for the United States. The fix was to only point to one
level up and not have a reference to the state from every location. It is
implicitly there.. in the final analysis we do not need to know in what
There is always special cases that needs special treatments, inference is
done again and again, there is no point to recompute everything with an
algorithm or a query with hard coded exceptions when we have a simple and
regular system who can handle and put the exceptions in the datas.
Class of
Hoi,
You lost me. What have classes to do with this?
The system is flexible and you assume that there are special cases... Name
one and it can be fit in.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 11 June 2014 11:48, Thomas Douillard thomas.douill...@gmail.com wrote:
There is always special cases that needs
On 10/06/14 22:50, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
It is stated that there are no qualifiers included. In one of the
articles you write that it is to be understood that the vailidity of the
information is dependent on the existing qualifiers.
What is the value of these RDF exports with the
I'm still talking of the model I proposed in my first post in this thread.
I did give an advantage : you can really simply query the type of units
used by a country to class his administrative units, like Region,
Departement (as two items) for France with just simple in one request of
the future
In case anyone is a bit lost, Tom is proposing an approach to
classification we've been calling explicit metamodeling. Simply put,
let's say you have a class hierarchy:
A subclass of B
B subclass of C
C subclass of D
The proposal, as I understand it, is to add instance of claims for almost
all
http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/files/3129/paper.pdf (forgot the URL)
2014-06-11 16:43 GMT+02:00 Thomas Douillard thomas.douill...@gmail.com:
For a maybe more example, this paper follow that path, and gives example
(and in the same time proves the approach is fully compatible with OWL2
reasoning).
You might also find the new property browser helpful:
http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-exports/miga/
(as mentioned before, requires one of Google Chrome, Safari, Opera, or
Android Browser to work).
While an excellent list and a neat tool, it sadly isn't organised in a way that
fits my
On 11/06/14 17:13, Derric Atzrott wrote:
You might also find the new property browser helpful:
http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-exports/miga/
(as mentioned before, requires one of Google Chrome, Safari, Opera, or
Android Browser to work).
While an excellent list and a neat tool, it sadly
Excellent work Markus. Your tools are helping me to debunk bad science the
world over[1].
Keep up the great work.
Max
PS. By the way, if you do stack overflow you may want to chime in on this
purpose-built question[2].
[1]
On 11/06/14 19:52, Maximilian Klein wrote:
Excellent work Markus. Your tools are helping me to debunk bad science
the world over[1].
Keep up the great work.
Thanks :-)
Max
PS. By the way, if you do stack overflow you may want to chime in on
this purpose-built question[2].
I lost my
Am 11.06.2014 17:27, schrieb Markus Krötzsch:
Yes, I know what you mean. I'd love to integrate property group
information into our view as well, but I don't know where to get this
information from (other than by scraping it from the wiki page, which
does not seem to be right). Any pointers to
On 11/06/14 20:49, Bene* wrote:
Am 11.06.2014 17:27, schrieb Markus Krötzsch:
Yes, I know what you mean. I'd love to integrate property group
information into our view as well, but I don't know where to get this
information from (other than by scraping it from the wiki page, which
does not seem
Found the bug: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49554
See also
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Development_plan#Statements_on_properties
Am 11.06.2014 20:49, schrieb Bene*:
Am 11.06.2014 17:27, schrieb Markus Krötzsch:
Yes, I know what you mean. I'd love to integrate
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org wrote:
On 11/06/14 20:49, Bene* wrote:
Am 11.06.2014 17:27, schrieb Markus Krötzsch:
Yes, I know what you mean. I'd love to integrate property group
information into our view as well, but I don't know where to
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Bene* benestar.wikime...@gmail.com wrote:
The bot operator seems to parse the content of the Wikidata:List of
properties
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:List_of_properties/Summary_table
subpages, see
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:17 PM, aude aude.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Bene* benestar.wikime...@gmail.com
wrote:
The bot operator seems to parse the content of the Wikidata:List of
properties
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:List_of_properties/Summary_table
Hey everyone,
Just thought I'd inform that I have changed the design of all three
Wikidata mailing lists (wikidata-l, wikidata-tech and wikidata-bugs) to a
new, more appealing design.
It is based off the one currently used on MediaWiki-l (with source publicly
available by Quim Gil) the changes
23 matches
Mail list logo
