OK Andy Gerard, cut it out! I like both of you, but we will never fix
things this way. As you correctly point out Gerard, Wikipedians should
spend more time adding labels and aliases to existing items and creating
new items on Wikidata rather than just making redirects on Wikipedia. As
you
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Wikidata is NOT there to serve the English Wikipedia at the expense of its
own integrity. A wish has been formulated to support redirects by
WIkipedians while Wikidata has been EXPLICITLY designed NOT to support
redirects but more importantly parts of articles.
If we
Hi Lukas!
That really shouldn't happen...
Can you tell me on which item that happens?
Also, please double-check the namespace and content model of the respective
entry in the dump.
-- daniel
Am 21.10.2014 17:02, schrieb Lukas Benedix:
Different keys can still be found in the actual xml dump
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:47 AM, svetlana svetl...@fastmail.com.au wrote:
If we have a need in pointing (at Wikibase/Wikidata) to redirects on a
regular basis, it might be time to rethink the relevant project design.
I think that rethinking the project design is the right approach here. To
Am 22.10.2014 07:29, schrieb Gerard Meijssen:
Hoi,
Is this dump going to be cleaned up? Will the next dump be good? Why did this
go
wrong?
Frankly, we have no idea why this is going wrong. I cannot reproduce the problem
locally, and it seems to work fine with Special:Export.
Dump
Am 22.10.2014 11:06, schrieb Daniel Kinzler:
Hi Lukas!
That really shouldn't happen...
Can you tell me on which item that happens?
Also, please double-check the namespace and content model of the respective
entry in the dump.
Never mind, I found it in the dump. Can't reproduce, though.
Hoi,
I do not consider myself confused. I am speaking plain language.
The article: Death of Alice Gross has information about a living person
while it is NOT a living person. As it is, current practices like with the
Death of Alice Gross are problematic already enough.
When you want redirects,
Citiranje James Heald j.he...@ucl.ac.uk:
(1) There would be no change to the item structure on Wikidata in any
way -- no change to the values of any of the item properties -- only
some extra sitelinks.
So I don't see *why* you think there would be any risk to Wikidata's
own integrity.
Citiranje James Heald j.he...@ucl.ac.uk:
(1) There would be no change to the item structure on Wikidata in any
way -- no change to the values of any of the item properties -- only
some extra sitelinks.
So I don't see *why* you think there would be any risk to Wikidata's
own integrity.
On 22/10/2014 14:23, Smolenski Nikola wrote:
Citiranje James Heald j.he...@ucl.ac.uk:
(1) There would be no change to the item structure on Wikidata in any
way -- no change to the values of any of the item properties -- only
some extra sitelinks.
So I don't see *why* you think there would be
Gerard, I still don't see a problem.
If somebody wants to search on Reasonator, they can search on
Reasonator, and they will get exactly the same Reasonator pages as
before -- the only difference is that those Reasonator pages will
include more links to relevant Wikipedia pages, with some of
Citiranje James Heald j.he...@ucl.ac.uk:
On 22/10/2014 14:23, Smolenski Nikola wrote:
Citiranje James Heald j.he...@ucl.ac.uk:
(1) There would be no change to the item structure on Wikidata in any
way -- no change to the values of any of the item properties -- only
some extra sitelinks.
Hoi,
FORGET ABOUT REASONATOR, FORGET ABOUT WIKIPEDIA, FORGET ABOUT WIKIDATA
It is about sharing information. That is what this is all about. The
information is NOT in Wikipedia, only the data is in Wikidata, there are
plenty examples of that. Redirects are something you come up with because
it
All right, that may not be a big problem. However, it would be a big problem
if
we have:
Q(Coat of Arms of Novi Sad) - Coat of Arms of Novi Sad - Novi Sad
Q(something) - Coat of arms of Novi Sad - Novi Sad
Q(something) - Coat of arms of novi sad - Novi Sad
This is an argument against
Citiranje Derric Atzrott datzr...@alizeepathology.com:
I do think though that having something like what you describe happen is
more
of a user error though. Can you think of any possible Q(something) that
Right now, since only linking to articles is allowed, and only one article can
be linked
15 matches
Mail list logo
