Hi Leigh and Anil
The concept of "non-moderated" and "moderated" content aligns very well
with WE's work on the quality assurance framework. Our current thinking
on quality is based on a tiered framework starting from a draft phase of
a personal teaching resource ==> featured teaching resource ==
It is great to have Anil back with us raising this again. Thanks Anil.
I very much like the idea of the moderated and not-yet moderated assessment
standard. And Peter's link to the Quality is a good one I think, esspecially
the first step of using categories.
I wonder if we could review one of Ot
No need to be sorry, we all need a break once in a while when we give
our full energy to the things we value, spending endless hours, working
tireless, to make the things we believe, a success.
You are a wonderful advocate. Enjoy your time off
Patricia
Fro
Ever since both the Transnational Qualification Framework (
http://www.wikieducator.org/Qualification_Framework) and the Quality
Assurance Framework (http://www.wikieducator.org/
WikiEducator:Quality_Assurance_Framework) projects started I have
wondered where these two overlap. I believe they are
You are right Dr. Wayne, we have to develop a sustainable nonprofit
management model for WikiEducator. For that the WE community may be
further strengthened in a formal way. The WE Council is a good step
indeed.
In the next version, we may bring in Qualification Framework so that
the content can
Hi Nellie,
The points from all WEs have been fruitful.
> I totally agree with you, Victor. However, should there be an agreed
> upon policy?
I dont know if a policy really works well in this regard. It can
definatly work if there is an enforcement clause or something, or WE
had a large force to
