Maarten,
I sympathize! The short answer is yes. The main problem is proving the
encyclopedic value of lists of monuments. In order to do this, you
basically need to define monument at the local level. I guess an article
on cultural heritage in Scotland would be appropriate, since National
Heritage
Kilian,
Thanks for your quick answer! I agree, and I think that you can only
succeed if the terms are explained at the local level. So maybe Listed
Building (Scotland) would be the best article to create here. I myself had
trouble when I tried to create lists for Belgium and the term Beschermd
restarting the thread with a correct title now :)
2012/5/22 Platonides platoni...@gmail.com
On 22/05/12 01:11, Kilian Kluge wrote:
So what do I suggest you do instead?
As I said, we're facing a similar (if not worse) situation in Germany.
We have literally more than one thousand
Good evening,
2012/5/22 Platonides platoni...@gmail.com
What identifier is used by people when uploading the images?
If the unprefixed one, how do you find out automatically the municipality?
We will most likely ask for the original identifier. The template
structure on Commons is already
Hi Platonides,
Op 5-5-2012 23:29, Platonides schreef:
On 03/05/12 15:31, Harald Groven wrote:
I have been looking for tools on Toolserver for exporting KML/XML from
the monuments database, but none of the tools seems to export web
address to the image the name of photographer (which is
Hi Richard,
Op 15-5-2012 16:51, Pharos schreef:
Fwiw, the World Monuments Fund have actually donated a few videos to Commons:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Videos_by_the_World_Monuments_Fund
Thanks for pointing this out. Do you know who is the contact on the
Wikimedia side and
