Thank you. Now I'm trying to look next 100 photos but something is wrong
with this server (Bad Gateway), Is it possible to fix?
Regards, Andrij
2012/9/2 Platonides platoni...@gmail.com
On 01/09/12 21:41, Андрій Бондаренко wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to sort photos in Images from Wiki
Talking about Columbia, can you please complete the move from the
chapter wiki to the Spanish Wikipedia?
Maarten
Op 3 sep 2012 om 03:11 heeft Racso ra...@colombia.com het volgende
geschreven:\
En Colombia no tenemos listas de coordenadas. Por ello, quisiera
fomentar que los
On 03/09/12 00:48, Cristian Consonni wrote:
2012/9/2 emijrp emi...@gmail.com:
Please, spread the word about the maps on Twitter, Facebook, and link from
official WLM websites when possible. People like to see which monuments they
can photograph, instead of reading long lists on Wikipedias. I
On 03/09/12 09:00, Андрій Бондаренко wrote:
Thank you. Now I'm trying to look next 100 photos but something is wrong
with this server (Bad Gateway), Is it possible to fix?
Regards, Andrij
Works for me right now.
Although the toolserver has been having a few problems this days. Keep
trying.
http://www.giswiki.org/hjl_geocoding.htm is probably the best option. The
template should already have a variable for lat/lon, and automatically
create the coordinates templates from that (this should work properly if
you work from the Wikipedia main namespaces). Just remember that if it says
W
Hi,
I currently have the following error in the Wizard:
mwe-upwiz-source-ownwork-assert-cc-by-sa-3.0-ro: Parse error at
position 263 in input: Eu, $2, titularul drepturilor de autor ale
{{PLURAL:$1|acestei lucrări|acestor lucrări}}, ofer oricui dreptul
irevocabil de a folosi {{PLURAL:$1|această
Hi,
This is a general question, not directed only to emijrp. Would it be
possible to have nice graphs with the evolution by day, like Nuno did
last year?
2012/9/2 Naveen Francis navee...@wikimedia.in:
Hi
Will there be a bot run to ask Monuments ID ?
Many photographs are uploaded without proper monument ID
How so? The ID field should be marked as required if you set up
correctly the Upload Campaign.
(There's still room for having monuments
Hi,
In Romania we have a rudimentary check in the {{Monument istoric}}
template - we check that the code begins with a valid county sign. If
it doesn't, we add the files to a special category. You could try
something like that, but that still means you'll have to fix them by
hand.
Strainu
2012/9/2 Michael Andersen m...@tdcadsl.dk:
But some free licenses are better than others. What would happen if one of
the winners was a GFDL? Would it not mean that we would have to add the
whole GFDL text to the calendar and wherever we would like to use the
photos?
I think that it would be
Hi,
In Romania we have a rudimentary check in the {{Monument istoric}}
template - we check that the code begins with a valid county sign. If
it doesn't, we add the files to a special category. You could try
something like that, but that still means you'll have to fix them by
hand.
I second
Hi, everyone,
Recently I noticed that some participants do not place ID of a monument
correctly. For example in this
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:38:27 +0300, Андрій Бондаренко wrote:
Hi, everyone,
Recently I noticed that some participants do not place ID of a
monument correctly. For example in this photo [1] ID is marked as
Ship_sunk_sev [2], but it is not correct. Correct number of this
monument (if I dont
Strainu,
I'm working on it, will probably have to fix statisticsct, like I did
for statistics.
--
Nuno Tavares
Wikimedia Portugal
http://www.wikimedia.pt
Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter
livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que
Hi,
No ideas on what the error might be?
Thanks,
Strainu
În data de 3 septembrie 2012, 11:43, Strainu strain...@gmail.com a scris:
Hi,
I currently have the following error in the Wizard:
mwe-upwiz-source-ownwork-assert-cc-by-sa-3.0-ro: Parse error at
position 263 in input: Eu, $2,
I'm afraid my Romanian (or Latin, for that matter) is not good enough to
understand it no.
Lodewijk
2012/9/3 Strainu strain...@gmail.com
Hi,
No ideas on what the error might be?
Thanks,
Strainu
În data de 3 septembrie 2012, 11:43, Strainu strain...@gmail.com a
scris:
Hi,
I
Strainu, 03/09/2012 15:28:
No ideas on what the error might be?
Could have been this syntax error in your translation:
https://translatewiki.net/w/i.php?title=MediaWiki%3AMwe-upwiz-source-ownwork-assert-cc-by-sa-3.0%2Frodiff=4199528oldid=4196303
Let's see if LocalisationUpdate fixes it by
2012/9/3 Strainu strain...@gmail.com:
mwe-upwiz-source-ownwork-assert-cc-by-sa-3.0-ro: Parse error at
Shouldn't that be:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Mwe-upwiz-source-ownwork-assert-cc-by-sa-3.0/ro
with slash ro and not dash ro, both pages exist:
*
If it's possible (I doubt it), Siebrand or someone else should force
the update, or if it's not possible, create a temporary message
MediaWiki:Mwe-upwiz-source-ownwork-assert-cc-by-sa-3.0/ro on Commons,
because AFAIK it makes UploadWizard non-operable.
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Federico
2012/9/3 Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.com:
Strainu, 03/09/2012 15:28:
No ideas on what the error might be?
Could have been this syntax error in your translation:
There is no banner in Wikipedia from Switzerland.
Is there any problem?
Regards
--
Ilario Valdelli
Wikimedia CH
Verein zur Förderung Freien Wissens
Association pour l’avancement des connaissances libre
Associazione per il sostegno alla conoscenza libera
Switzerland - 8008 Zürich
Tel:
One of Belarusian contestants addressed me a mail with a question: may
they reupload the same photo with a better quality and what
consequences will it have concerning WLM.
So, may the participant replace the file uploaded for WLM with the
same file of better quality? Will the new file be treated
Hi Ilario,
thanks for the message.
Indeed there is a technical problem--I had to turn off the banners in
Austria, Liechtenstein and Switzerland yesterday evening. We hope to
have it resolved in the upcoming hours; I'll let you know as soon as
the banners are back (but you'll notice that yourself,
Hi Paul,
primarily this question is up to the jury. My personal opinion is that a
re-upload of higher quality is simply the same picture and this not a
seperate submission.
An edited version wouldn't be your own work fully, so wouldn't fit the
contest rules.
Best,
Lodewijk
2012/9/3 Paul
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org wrote:
Hi Paul,
An edited version wouldn't be your own work fully, so wouldn't fit the
contest rules.
What then? Should the photo be rejected at all?
Oh, by the way, what if the uploader fixes the photo by themselves?
Will
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.orgwrote:
Like I said: that is very situation specific, and up to the jury to
decide.
Sometimes, unknowingly, watermarks like time stamps are default in Camera,
and the uploader may choose to upload the cropped version. This
exactly, it depends on the situation :)
2012/9/3 Karthik Nadar karthik...@gmail.com
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.orgwrote:
Like I said: that is very situation specific, and up to the jury to
decide.
Sometimes, unknowingly, watermarks like time
Thank you guys for your comments!
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org wrote:
exactly, it depends on the situation :)
2012/9/3 Karthik Nadar karthik...@gmail.com
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org
wrote:
Like I said:
Sometimes, unknowingly, watermarks like time stamps are default in
Camera, and the uploader may choose to upload the cropped version.
This issue is situational and all should not be ignored.
I personally always post-process all of my photos before uploading,
including cropping, perspective
On Mon, September 3, 2012 16:17, Paul Selitskas wrote:
If it's possible (I doubt it), Siebrand or someone else should force
the update, or if it's not possible, create a temporary message
MediaWiki:Mwe-upwiz-source-ownwork-assert-cc-by-sa-3.0/ro on Commons,
because AFAIK it makes UploadWizard
Thanks for bringing this out. This is very informative, I've just
encountered the same inquiry.
Roel
Wiki Loves Monuments Philippines
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ruwrote:
Sometimes, unknowingly, watermarks like time stamps are default in
Camera, and the
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Siebrand Mazeland s.mazel...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Mon, September 3, 2012 16:17, Paul Selitskas wrote:
If it's possible (I doubt it), Siebrand or someone else should force
the update, or if it's not possible, create a temporary message
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 05:14:23PM +0200, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
Sometimes, unknowingly, watermarks like time stamps are default in
Camera, and the uploader may choose to upload the cropped version.
This issue is situational and all should not be ignored.
I personally always
OK, thank you. Indeed it is quiet easy to correct ID if the monument is
well-known (as in my first
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Andre Koopal an...@molens.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 05:14:23PM +0200, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
Sometimes, unknowingly, watermarks like time stamps are default in
Camera, and the uploader may choose to upload the cropped version.
This issue is
2012/9/3 Maarten Dammers maar...@mdammers.nl
Talking about Columbia, can you please complete the move from the chapter
wiki to the Spanish Wikipedia?
Is this really, really necessary? As the contest is running, I would like
to keep changes at a minimum, and I see that everything is just
2012/9/3 Андрій Бондаренко bondarean...@gmail.com:
OK, thank you. Indeed it is quiet easy to correct ID if the monument is
well-known (as in my first example), but much more difficult when it is not.
Moreover, sometimes users make photo of objects that does not seem to be
officially
Do you update the coordinates by reparsing the lists? Participants
update the data in lists (mostly add coordinates where there are no
any).
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:35 AM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm making maps for WLM, if you need a map for your country and have
lists with
2012/9/3 Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org
If you're afraid of things failing, you could of course just copy it first
and see if everything works. There's no need to delete it.
I may try that, indeed. The problem is that, anyway, one would need to do
changes in the bots/database/etc. to
I don't see the problem, Racso.
At the moment, the Argentinian, Chilean, Mexican, Panamanian and Spanish
contest are working fine on Wikipedia. The templates are updated and
working with a direct link to the UploadWizard; it just needs a copy-paste.
2012/9/3 Racso ra...@colombia.com
2012/9/3
Hi,
Op 3 sep 2012 om 18:02 heeft Racso ra...@colombia.com het volgende
geschreven:\
2012/9/3 Maarten Dammers maar...@mdammers.nl
Talking about Columbia, can you please complete the move from the
chapter wiki to the Spanish Wikipedia?
Is this really, really necessary?
Yes, it is.
As
The bots look at Wikipedia and so do the users. I can't even edit the
lists on your wiki!
Maarten
Op 3 sep 2012 om 19:41 heeft Racso ra...@colombia.com het volgende
geschreven:\
2012/9/3 Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org
If you're afraid of things failing, you could of course just
2012/9/3 Maarten Dammers maar...@mdammers.nl
The bots look at Wikipedia and so do the users.
That's not 100% right. Some bots are looking in the ext-wiki (in fact,
right now the colombian monuments appear fine in the contest database), and
the users look where the contest rules say they must
2012/9/3 André Costa lokal_pro...@hotmail.com
I found that writing a comment in the id field label of the upload wizard
drastically reduced the number of incorrect id's last year. See e.g.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Mwe-upwiz-campaigns-wlm-se-bbr-id/en
So assuming your id's
Hi all.
Since this morning, we have our site offline due to a 403 error, for the
high number of requests we had to wikilovesmonuments.mx website. We
moved to another
server the site to have it online soon.
I guess automatically the CentralNotice banner is redirecting to the
international site.
Hej,
since most of our Swedish Monuments don't have a useful name or
address our monument map
http://wikilovesmonuments.se/delta-i-tavlingen/hitta-monument/ only
shows the id and municipality. This information is often not
sufficient enough at all, if you don't know if you are looking for a
house
On 03/09/12 16:45, Paul Selitskas wrote:
One of Belarusian contestants addressed me a mail with a question: may
they reupload the same photo with a better quality and what
consequences will it have concerning WLM.
So, may the participant replace the file uploaded for WLM with the
same file
El 03/09/12 21:24, Racso escribió:
Done. Every list is now in Wikipedia. They are listed under the
following category:
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categor%C3%ADa:Anexo:Monumentos_nacionales_de_Colombia.
I guess the bots must be updated now? After everything is fine, I will
direct the
Well, although technically possible to print, I do not exclude the
possibility that the jury might favor a GFDL-only licensed picture less
than a CC BY-SA picture. It definitely makes the image less useful.
Anyway - we're bikeshedding.
Lodewijk
2012/9/3 Platonides platoni...@gmail.com
On
On 03/09/12 20:55, Racso wrote:
2012/9/3 André Costa:
I found that writing a comment in the id field label of the upload
wizard drastically reduced the number of incorrect id's last year.
See e.g.
On 02/09/12 21:28, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 12:17:28 -0700, Matthew Roth wrote:
Interesting thread here, if anyone wants to read or contribute. I saw
on Piwik that nearly 200 folks come over to the US site from the
review and stumbled upon this.
On 02/09/12 23:25, Tomasz W. Kozowski wrote:
Personally, I find this slogan quite good: it has a clear call to
action, mentions the goal of the contest (to help Wikipedia by
uploading photos), and will be true when we push it onto the projects
:-)) However, as this is quite
Related to this. Is there a way of matching the name entry in the
database to a combination of list parameters?
To be specific in the case of se-fornmin having
name = {{{namn|}}} ({{{raä-nr|}}}, {{{typ|}}})
rather than just the current
name = {{{namn|}}}
The problem is that only 7% of the
I'm not sure I understand the question correctly. Yes, it is possible to
carry information in the url. Try for example to click the upload image on
the right side of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_India/Wiki_Loves_Monuments/Delhi
. That could give for example:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/09/12 23:25, Tomasz W. Kozłowski wrote:
Personally, I find this slogan quite good: it has a clear call to
action, mentions the goal of the contest (to help Wikipedia by
uploading photos), and will be true when we
2012/9/4 Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org
I'm not sure I understand the question correctly. Yes, it is possible to
carry information in the url. Try for example to click the upload image on
the right side of
If the setting for se-fornmin could be set to that then that should
alleviate our problems.
Thanks,
Andre / Lokal_Profil
On 3 September 2012 23:27, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/09/12 00:19, André Costa wrote:
Related to this. Is there a way of matching the name entry in the
I strongly suggest that you get some native English speakers, say from
the UK, Canada, India or Australia to review the record banner.
Participate in the world's biggest photo competition and help improve
Wikipedia!
It just sounds odd to an American ear, something about mixing formal
words
Hello.
I have detected that a participant just uploaded photographs he found on
internet, so I must proceed to mark them for deletion. Sigh.
My question is, Does someone know about any [semi-]automated tool to verify
if uploaded images already existed? I use Google image search, but that
tool
2012/9/3 Platonides platoni...@gmail.com
Racso, if you don't have such id, I'd use instead (ver las listas, por
ejemplo: 12-345). You provide the id format with an example, and people
just wanting to bypass the form get an identifier to pass it (which we
can automately disqualify).
I think
I think I'll wait until tomorrow before asking for deletion, to let the
participant answer (just in case [?]).
I have another question about the topic: should I disqualify invalid images
(e.g. from monuments that aren't on the lists) immediately, or wait (until
when? the end of the contest?)?
http://www.tineye.com/
and others
http://www.makeuseof.com/dir/whostolemypictures-find-duplicate-pictures-online/
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Racso ra...@colombia.com wrote:
Hello.
I have detected that a participant just uploaded photographs he found on
internet, so I must proceed to
62 matches
Mail list logo
