Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Record banner should be in idiomatic English

Hi Pete, if I may then give some feedback on your proposal :) For a non-native like me thís sounds quite confusing. The first is OK (although I personally feel 'join' is not activating enough), but the second 'sentence' doesn't contain a verb and that makes it very odd for me. Since we're using t

[Wiki Loves Monuments] video tutorial

I made a video tutorial about contributing to the Romanian contest: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cum_se_contribuie_la_Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2012.ogv Is a video, so it can't pe translated/adapted for other communities, but others may reuse the idea. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Copyvio checking

http://www.tineye.com/ and others http://www.makeuseof.com/dir/whostolemypictures-find-duplicate-pictures-online/ On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Racso wrote: > Hello. > > I have detected that a participant just uploaded photographs he found on > internet, so I must proceed to mark them for dele

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Copyvio checking

I think I'll wait until tomorrow before asking for deletion, to let the participant answer (just in case [?]). I have another question about the topic: should I disqualify invalid images (e.g. from monuments that aren't on the lists) immediately, or wait (until when? the end of the contest?)? Rac

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Incorrect ID's in competition photos - what to do?

2012/9/3 Platonides > Racso, if you don't have such id, I'd use instead "(ver las listas, por > ejemplo: 12-345)". You provide the id format with an example, and people > just wanting to bypass the form get an identifier to pass it (which we > can automately disqualify). > > I think that's a good

[Wiki Loves Monuments] Copyvio checking

Hello. I have detected that a participant just uploaded photographs he found on internet, so I must proceed to mark them for deletion. Sigh. My question is, Does someone know about any [semi-]automated tool to verify if uploaded images already existed? I use Google image search, but that tool req

[Wiki Loves Monuments] Record banner should be in idiomatic English

I strongly suggest that you get some native English speakers, say from the UK, Canada, India or Australia to review the record banner. "Participate in the world's biggest photo competition and help improve Wikipedia!" It just sounds odd to an American ear, something about mixing formal words (parti

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Minor API improvement

If the setting for se-fornmin could be set to that then that should alleviate our problems. Thanks, Andre / Lokal_Profil On 3 September 2012 23:27, Platonides wrote: > On 04/09/12 00:19, André Costa wrote: > > Related to this. Is there a way of matching the "name" entry in the > > database to a

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Generate Upload campaign link based on ID

2012/9/4 Lodewijk > I'm not sure I understand the question correctly. Yes, it is possible to > carry information in the url. Try for example to click the upload image on > the right side of > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_India/Wiki_Loves_Monuments/Delhi > . That could give f

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] CentralNotice slogan translation request (for a record banner)

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Platonides wrote: > On 02/09/12 23:25, Tomasz W. Kozłowski wrote: > > Personally, I find this slogan quite good: it has a clear call to > action, mentions the goal of the contest (to help Wikipedia by > uploading photos), and will be true when we push it onto the

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] CentralNotice slogan translation request (for a record banner)

On 4 September 2012 00:17, Platonides wrote: > We should also have blog posts prepared for that event. Maybe add a > reference for the statement in the CentralNotice? I will try to prepare a blog post for that occasion about two days' in advance, and will be sending it to you off-list under a s

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Generate Upload campaign link based on ID

I'm not sure I understand the question correctly. Yes, it is possible to carry information in the url. Try for example to click the upload image on the right side of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_India/Wiki_Loves_Monuments/Delhi . That could give for example: http://commons.wik

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Generate Upload campaign link based on ID

I think there's no problem to do this with WIkiMarkup in the table row template, using our existing parameters. If anyone does it differently please let us know. —Yan (Ynhockey). On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Itzik Edri wrote: > Hi, > > Did one of our many WLM tools offer an option to generat

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Minor API improvement

On 04/09/12 00:19, André Costa wrote: > Related to this. Is there a way of matching the "name" entry in the > database to a combination of list parameters? > > To be specific in the case of se-fornmin having > name = {{{namn|}}} ({{{raä-nr|}}}, {{{typ|}}}) > rather than just the current > name

[Wiki Loves Monuments] Generate Upload campaign link based on ID

Hi, Did one of our many WLM tools offer an option to generate and direct the user to Upload campaign link based on a monument ID? I mean user can enter the ID on our website, and via a WLM web-tool we can direct him with all the data from the monument ID to the upload wizard ( http://commons.wiki

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Minor API improvement

Related to this. Is there a way of matching the "name" entry in the database to a combination of list parameters? To be specific in the case of se-fornmin having name = {{{namn|}}} ({{{raä-nr|}}}, {{{typ|}}}) rather than just the current name = {{{namn|}}} The problem is that only 7% of the e

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] CentralNotice slogan translation request (for a record banner)

On 02/09/12 23:25, Tomasz W. Kozłowski wrote: Personally, I find this slogan quite good: it has a clear call to action, mentions the goal of the contest (to help Wikipedia by uploading photos), and will be true when we push it onto the projects :-)) However, as this is quite a

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] discussion on blog about WLM and free licensing

On 02/09/12 21:28, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote: > On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 12:17:28 -0700, Matthew Roth wrote: >> Interesting thread here, if anyone wants to read or contribute. I saw >> on Piwik that nearly 200 folks come over to the US site from the >> review and stumbled upon this. >> >> http://www.dpre

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Incorrect ID's in competition photos - what to do?

On 03/09/12 20:55, Racso wrote: > 2012/9/3 André Costa: > > I found that writing a comment in the id field label of the upload > wizard drastically reduced the number of incorrect id's last year. > See e.g. > > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Mwe-upwiz-campaigns-wlm-s

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] sorting by upload time - is it possible?

On 03/09/12 09:30, Platonides wrote: > For some reason > http://toolserver.org/~platonides/wlm/uploads.php?order=earlier&limit=100&country=ua > is no longer starting with Godly.JPG (which appear in the previous > page). That does seem a problem in the tool, and I'll look into it. > Regards The pro

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Acceptable licences (UploadCampaigns options)

Well, although technically possible to print, I do not exclude the possibility that the jury might favor a GFDL-only licensed picture less than a CC BY-SA picture. It definitely makes the image less useful. Anyway - we're bikeshedding. Lodewijk 2012/9/3 Platonides > On 02/09/12 20:53, Michael

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Acceptable licences (UploadCampaigns options)

On 02/09/12 20:53, Michael Andersen wrote: > Hi > > The idea was to have a contest where users upload pictures of monuments with > a free license. > > But some free licenses are better than others. What would happen if one of > the winners was a GFDL? Would it not mean that we would have to add

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM maps

El 03/09/12 21:24, Racso escribió: > Done. Every list is now in Wikipedia. They are listed under the > following category: > http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categor%C3%ADa:Anexo:Monumentos_nacionales_de_Colombia. > I guess the bots must be updated now? After everything is fine, I will > direct the pa

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Minor API improvement

On 03/09/12 21:21, Holger Motzkau wrote: > Hej, > > since most of our Swedish Monuments don't have a useful name or > address our monument map > http://wikilovesmonuments.se/delta-i-tavlingen/hitta-monument/ only > shows the id and municipality. This information is often not > sufficient enough at

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Reuploading

On 03/09/12 16:45, Paul Selitskas wrote: > One of Belarusian contestants addressed me a mail with a question: may > they reupload the same photo with a better quality and what > consequences will it have concerning WLM. > > So, may the participant replace the file uploaded for WLM with the > same

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Site offline and redirection WikiLovesMonuments.mx

Hi Ivan, thanks for the message. I am afraid that your guess is wrong; there is no such feature in the CentralNotice system to automatically check what HTTP code a website is responding with. I am also afraid that we have sent a few thousands unique visitors to a non-working website (I estimate th

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM maps

Done. Every list is now in Wikipedia. They are listed under the following category: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categor%C3%ADa:Anexo:Monumentos_nacionales_de_Colombia. I guess the bots must be updated now? After everything is fine, I will direct the participants to those lists directly from the we

[Wiki Loves Monuments] Minor API improvement

Hej, since most of our Swedish Monuments don't have a useful name or address our monument map http://wikilovesmonuments.se/delta-i-tavlingen/hitta-monument/ only shows the id and municipality. This information is often not sufficient enough at all, if you don't know if you are looking for a house

[Wiki Loves Monuments] Site offline and redirection WikiLovesMonuments.mx

Hi all. Since this morning, we have our site offline due to a 403 error, for the high number of requests we had to wikilovesmonuments.mx website. We moved to another server the site to have it online soon. I guess automatically the CentralNotice banner is redirecting to the international site. Whe

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Incorrect ID's in competition photos - what to do?

done also changed the English one to "Monument id (please see lists; should be 5 digits: XX-XXX)" On 3 September 2012 19:55, Racso wrote: > 2012/9/3 André Costa > >> I found that writing a comment in the id field label of the upload wizard >> drastically reduced the number of incorrect id's las

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Incorrect ID's in competition photos - what to do?

2012/9/3 André Costa > I found that writing a comment in the id field label of the upload wizard > drastically reduced the number of incorrect id's last year. See e.g. > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Mwe-upwiz-campaigns-wlm-se-bbr-id/en > > So assuming your id's always take a simil

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM maps

2012/9/3 Maarten Dammers > The bots look at Wikipedia and so do the users. > That's not 100% right. Some bots are looking in the ext-wiki (in fact, right now the colombian monuments appear fine in the contest database), and the users look where the contest rules say they must look. > I can't e

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM maps

The bots look at Wikipedia and so do the users. I can't even edit the lists on your wiki! Maarten Op 3 sep 2012 om 19:41 heeft Racso het volgende geschreven:\ 2012/9/3 Lodewijk If you're afraid of things failing, you could of course just copy it first and see if everything works. Ther

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM maps

Hi, Op 3 sep 2012 om 18:02 heeft Racso het volgende geschreven:\ 2012/9/3 Maarten Dammers Talking about Columbia, can you please complete the move from the chapter wiki to the Spanish Wikipedia? Is this really, really necessary? Yes, it is. As the contest is running, I would like to

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM maps

I don't see the problem, Racso. At the moment, the Argentinian, Chilean, Mexican, Panamanian and Spanish contest are working fine on Wikipedia. The templates are updated and working with a direct link to the UploadWizard; it just needs a copy-paste. 2012/9/3 Racso > 2012/9/3 Lodewijk > >> If yo

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM maps

2012/9/3 Lodewijk > If you're afraid of things failing, you could of course just copy it first > and see if everything works. There's no need to delete it. I may try that, indeed. The problem is that, anyway, one would need to do changes in the bots/database/etc. to make them point to the new l

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM maps

Do you update the coordinates by reparsing the lists? Participants update the data in lists (mostly add coordinates where there are no any). On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:35 AM, emijrp wrote: > Hi, I'm making maps for WLM, if you need a map for your country and have > lists with coordinates, contact

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Incorrect ID's in competition photos - what to do?

2012/9/3 Андрій Бондаренко : > OK, thank you. Indeed it is quiet easy to correct ID if the monument is > well-known (as in my first example), but much more difficult when it is not. > Moreover, sometimes users make photo of objects that does not seem to be > officially recognized as heritage monum

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM maps

If you're afraid of things failing, you could of course just copy it first and see if everything works. There's no need to delete it. But one of the identified success factors has always been that pictures end up on Wikipedia - that is what motivates a lot of people. Lodewijk 2012/9/3 Racso > 2

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM maps

2012/9/3 Maarten Dammers > Talking about Columbia, can you please complete the move from the chapter > wiki to the Spanish Wikipedia? > Is this really, really necessary? As the contest is running, I would like to keep changes at a minimum, and I see that everything is just working fine (except t

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Reuploading

Hi, On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Andre Koopal wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 05:14:23PM +0200, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote: > > >Sometimes, unknowingly, watermarks like time stamps are default in > > >Camera, and the uploader may choose to upload the cropped version. > > >This issue is situat

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Incorrect ID's in competition photos - what to do?

OK, thank you. Indeed it is quiet easy to correct ID if the monument is well-known (as in my first example

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Reuploading

On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 05:14:23PM +0200, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote: > >Sometimes, unknowingly, watermarks like time stamps are default in > >Camera, and the uploader may choose to upload the cropped version. > >This issue is situational and all should not be ignored.  > > > > I personally always

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Translation issue

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Siebrand Mazeland wrote: > On Mon, September 3, 2012 16:17, Paul Selitskas wrote: >> If it's possible (I doubt it), Siebrand or someone else should force >> the update, or if it's not possible, create a temporary message >> MediaWiki:Mwe-upwiz-source-ownwork-assert-

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Translation issue

On Mon, September 3, 2012 16:17, Cristian Consonni wrote: > 2012/9/3 Strainu : >> mwe-upwiz-source-ownwork-assert-cc-by-sa-3.0-ro: Parse error at > > Shouldn't that be: > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Mwe-upwiz-source-ownwork-assert-cc-by-sa-3.0/ro > > with "slash ro" and not "dash ro

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Reuploading

Thanks for bringing this out. This is very informative, I've just encountered the same inquiry. Roel Wiki Loves Monuments Philippines On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote: > Sometimes, unknowingly, watermarks like time stamps are default in >> Camera, and the uploader may c

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Translation issue

On Mon, September 3, 2012 16:17, Paul Selitskas wrote: > If it's possible (I doubt it), Siebrand or someone else should force > the update, or if it's not possible, create a temporary message > MediaWiki:Mwe-upwiz-source-ownwork-assert-cc-by-sa-3.0/ro on Commons, > because AFAIK it makes UploadWiza

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Reuploading

Sometimes, unknowingly, watermarks like time stamps are default in Camera, and the uploader may choose to upload the cropped version. This issue is situational and all should not be ignored.  I personally always post-process all of my photos before uploading, including cropping, perspective co

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Reuploading

Thank you guys for your comments! On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Lodewijk wrote: > exactly, it depends on the situation :) > > > 2012/9/3 Karthik Nadar >> >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Lodewijk >> wrote: >>> >>> Like I said: that is very situation specific, and up to the jury to

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Reuploading

exactly, it depends on the situation :) 2012/9/3 Karthik Nadar > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Lodewijk wrote: > >> Like I said: that is very situation specific, and up to the jury to >> decide. > > Sometimes, unknowingly, watermarks like time stamps are default in Camera, > and the up

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Reuploading

Hi, On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Lodewijk wrote: > Like I said: that is very situation specific, and up to the jury to > decide. Sometimes, unknowingly, watermarks like time stamps are default in Camera, and the uploader may choose to upload the cropped version. This issue is situational and

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Reuploading

Like I said: that is very situation specific, and up to the jury to decide. Lodewijk 2012/9/3 Paul Selitskas > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Lodewijk > wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > An edited version wouldn't be your own work fully, so wouldn't fit the > > contest rules. > > What then? Sho

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Reuploading

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Lodewijk wrote: > Hi Paul, > > > An edited version wouldn't be your own work fully, so wouldn't fit the > contest rules. What then? Should the photo be rejected at all? Oh, by the way, what if the uploader fixes the photo by themselves? Will it yet fit the rules?

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Reuploading

Hi Paul, primarily this question is up to the jury. My personal opinion is that a re-upload of higher quality is simply the same picture and this not a seperate submission. An edited version wouldn't be your own work fully, so wouldn't fit the contest rules. Best, Lodewijk 2012/9/3 Paul Selitsk

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Banners in wikipedia

Hi Ilario, thanks for the message. Indeed there is a technical problem--I had to turn off the banners in Austria, Liechtenstein and Switzerland yesterday evening. We hope to have it resolved in the upcoming hours; I'll let you know as soon as the banners are back (but you'll notice that yourself,

[Wiki Loves Monuments] Reuploading

One of Belarusian contestants addressed me a mail with a question: may they reupload the same photo with a better quality and what consequences will it have concerning WLM. So, may the participant replace the file uploaded for WLM with the same file of better quality? Will the new file be treated

[Wiki Loves Monuments] Banners in wikipedia

There is no banner in Wikipedia from Switzerland. Is there any problem? Regards -- Ilario Valdelli Wikimedia CH Verein zur Förderung Freien Wissens Association pour l’avancement des connaissances libre Associazione per il sostegno alla conoscenza libera Switzerland - 8008 Zürich Tel: +417648213

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Translation issue

2012/9/3 Federico Leva (Nemo) : > Strainu, 03/09/2012 15:28: > >> No ideas on what the error might be? > > > Could have been this syntax error in your translation: > >

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Translation issue

If it's possible (I doubt it), Siebrand or someone else should force the update, or if it's not possible, create a temporary message MediaWiki:Mwe-upwiz-source-ownwork-assert-cc-by-sa-3.0/ro on Commons, because AFAIK it makes UploadWizard non-operable. On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Federico Leva

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Translation issue

2012/9/3 Strainu : > mwe-upwiz-source-ownwork-assert-cc-by-sa-3.0-ro: Parse error at Shouldn't that be: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Mwe-upwiz-source-ownwork-assert-cc-by-sa-3.0/ro with "slash ro" and not "dash ro", both pages exist: * http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:M

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Translation issue

Strainu, 03/09/2012 15:28: No ideas on what the error might be? Could have been this syntax error in your translation: Let's see if LocalisationUpdate fixes it by

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Translation issue

I'm afraid my Romanian (or Latin, for that matter) is not good enough to understand it no. Lodewijk 2012/9/3 Strainu > Hi, > > No ideas on what the error might be? > > Thanks, >Strainu > > În data de 3 septembrie 2012, 11:43, Strainu a > scris: > > Hi, > > > > I currently have the followin

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Translation issue

Hi, No ideas on what the error might be? Thanks, Strainu În data de 3 septembrie 2012, 11:43, Strainu a scris: > Hi, > > I currently have the following error in the Wizard: > > mwe-upwiz-source-ownwork-assert-cc-by-sa-3.0-ro: Parse error at > position 263 in input: Eu, $2, titularul drepturi

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Incorrect ID's in competition photos - what to do?

I found that writing a comment in the id field label of the upload wizard drastically reduced the number of incorrect id's last year. See e.g. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Mwe-upwiz-campaigns-wlm-se-bbr-id/en So assuming your id's always take a similar format you could just say som

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM maps

2012/9/3 Platonides : > That would be great. We talked about producing a version of those maps > with OSM instead of Google maps, but it seems harder to use OSM maps. Dear all, Luca Delucchi (an Italian member of OSM Foundation, in copy since he is not on this list) produced today this map for It

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Some statistics

Strainu, I'm working on it, will probably have to fix statisticsct, like I did for statistics. -- Nuno Tavares Wikimedia Portugal http://www.wikimedia.pt Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que e

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Incorrect ID's in competition photos - what to do?

On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 12:38:27 +0300, Андрій Бондаренко wrote: Hi, everyone, Recently I noticed that some participants do not place ID of a monument correctly.  For example in this photo [1] ID is  marked as "Ship_sunk_sev [2]", but it is not correct. Correct number of this monument (if I dont mist

[Wiki Loves Monuments] Incorrect ID's in competition photos - what to do?

Hi, everyone, Recently I noticed that some participants do not place ID of a monument correctly. For example in this photo

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Unknown Monument ID

Hi, In Romania we have a rudimentary check in the {{Monument istoric}} > template - we check that the code begins with a valid county sign. If > it doesn't, we add the files to a special category. You could try > something like that, but that still means you'll have to fix them by > hand. > I sec

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Acceptable licences (UploadCampaigns options)

2012/9/2 Michael Andersen : > But some free licenses are better than others. What would happen if one of > the winners was a GFDL? Would it not mean that we would have to add the > whole GFDL text to the calendar and wherever we would like to use the > photos? > > I think that it would be a shame.

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Unknown Monument ID

Hi, In Romania we have a rudimentary check in the {{Monument istoric}} template - we check that the code begins with a valid county sign. If it doesn't, we add the files to a special category. You could try something like that, but that still means you'll have to fix them by hand. Strainu 2012/9

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Unknown Monument ID

2012/9/2 Naveen Francis : > Hi > > Will there be a bot run to ask Monuments ID ? > Many photographs are uploaded without proper monument ID How so? The ID field should be marked as required if you set up correctly the Upload Campaign. (There's still room for having monuments without ID, see [1])

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Some statistics

Hi, This is a general question, not directed only to emijrp. Would it be possible to have nice graphs with the evolution by day, like Nuno did last year? http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org.pt/tools/stats/wlmchart.php?reload=0&ctwidth=600&ctheight=500&ctcountry=Portugal|Romania|Estonia|Austria|Ando

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Statistic question

2012/9/1 Nuno Tavares : > Cristian, > > That is no problem to the script, it will allow you to have your own > categories, as long as you tell me which one it is, and it obeys to the sort > key. > > However, normalization - like it happened in 2011 - in a worldwide event > like this always seems to

[Wiki Loves Monuments] Translation issue

Hi, I currently have the following error in the Wizard: mwe-upwiz-source-ownwork-assert-cc-by-sa-3.0-ro: Parse error at position 263 in input: Eu, $2, titularul drepturilor de autor ale {{PLURAL:$1|acestei lucrări|acestor lucrări}}, ofer oricui dreptul irevocabil de a folosi {{PLURAL:$1|această l

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM maps

http://www.giswiki.org/hjl_geocoding.htm is probably the best option. The template should already have a variable for lat/lon, and automatically create the coordinates templates from that (this should work properly if you work from the Wikipedia main namespaces). Just remember that if it says W yo

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM maps

Love the maps. There is a problem though: they don't seem to be in unicode and Hebrew doesn't work. Also is it possible to change the interface language for Google Maps? Google already has all the languages so it's not a translation issue. Thanks, —Yan (Ynhockey) On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:24 AM,

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] sorting by upload time - is it possible?

On 03/09/12 09:00, Андрій Бондаренко wrote: > Thank you. Now I'm trying to look next 100 photos but something is wrong > with this server ("Bad Gateway"), Is it possible to fix? > > Regards, Andrij Works for me right now. Although the toolserver has been having a few problems this days. Keep tryi

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM maps

On 03/09/12 00:48, Cristian Consonni wrote: > 2012/9/2 emijrp : >> Please, spread the word about the maps on Twitter, Facebook, and link from >> official WLM websites when possible. People like to see which monuments they >> can photograph, instead of reading long lists on Wikipedias. I hope this c

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] WLM maps

Talking about Columbia, can you please complete the move from the chapter wiki to the Spanish Wikipedia? Maarten Op 3 sep 2012 om 03:11 heeft Racso het volgende geschreven:\ En Colombia no tenemos listas de coordenadas. Por ello, quisiera fomentar que los participantes aporten las coord

Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] sorting by upload time - is it possible?

Thank you. Now I'm trying to look next 100 photos but something is wrong with this server ("Bad Gateway"), Is it possible to fix? Regards, Andrij 2012/9/2 Platonides > On 01/09/12 21:41, Андрій Бондаренко wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is it possible to sort photos in Images from Wiki Loves Monument