So, that patch got merged. Please do test on commons betalabs, where
it should have been deployed by now.
http://commons.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Main_Page
Thank you!
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Yuvi Panda wrote:
> Hello! I did get back from Vacation today, and will look at the
> pa
Hello! I did get back from Vacation today, and will look at the
patches tomorrow!
And as for when these things get deployed -
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki_1.22/Roadmap has the schedule
:) Every Monday, the master of UploadWizard is deployed to Commons.
Hope that helps!
On Wed, Aug 21,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Platonides wrote:
> I think Yuvipanda returns from vacation tomorrow, hopefully he will be able
> to review it then.
Does anyone have any idea of what's an estimated deployment time for
new features in an extension like UploadWizard? Can we like request a
special
On 20/08/13 23:21, David Narvaez wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Platonides:
Thus, IMHO we should go the UW checkbox path.
Just for the record, adding a checkbox is a little more work from the
code point of view than adding a select combo box, and I haven't been
able to get my tiny lit
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Platonides wrote:
> It's good to provide a streamlined process with as few options as possible,
> but don't try to give less than we should!
>
> - I think we should provide the users the option to participate into the
> Europeana award.
> They are the ones in the b
On 16/08/13 20:26, David Narvaez wrote:
Maybe I had the whole idea wrong, but isn't "is related to WWI" a
property of the monument and not of the photo? I think that, if
monument ID-000-10 is related to WWI, then all photos to ID-000-10
participate in the WWI contest, in which case the user does
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:07 AM, André Costa wrote:
> A posted a enhancement request based on this at bugzilla [1].
>
> In my view the easiest solution would be to add a tick box in the upload
> campaign for whether the image is part of this sub-competition or not. It
> would however also require
There was an earlier thread on this point.
In the UK, the photos will typically be of old buildings and not obvious war
memorials Some explanation of the wartime relevance may need to be added
manually during upload, but a box for the uploader to tick would also be
extremely helpful. Otherw
I should firstly point out that I think these are important additions to
campaigns irrespective of whether we end up using them in WLM. The need for
either was something I first noticed during WLPA but I can imagine various
other campaigns which might use them.
Whilst I agree the form should be as
Hi all, thanks for your comments
I share Lodewijk's point of view. Let's keep a wide understanding, but for
WW1.
If you feel like We can make it clearer with the name of the category: "WWI
and monuments".
Regarding the question of adding the checkbox or not to the uploadwizard
campaign, I don't
On 15/08/13 18:33, Maarten Dammers wrote:
Hi André,
Op 15-8-2013 15:07, André Costa schreef:
In my view the easiest solution would be to add a tick box in the
upload campaign for whether the image is part of this sub-competition
or not. It would however also require that the placement of the
wi
Hi Maarten,
I understood this actually to be the case, but only where related to
specifically WW1 - but indeed including a very broad understanding of
'connected' - i.e. also buildings that played a relevant role in WW1
(Palace of Versailles). Hopefully that avoids some of the confusion we
indeed
Hi Àlex,
Op 23-7-2013 10:53, Àlex Hinojo schreef:
2) Beside of sponsoring main prize, We’ll have a special category
within the contest entitled ‘World War I Monuments and Memorials'.
We already have a hard time explaining native English speakers that the
"Monuments" part in WLM is about old bui
Hi André,
Op 15-8-2013 15:07, André Costa schreef:
In my view the easiest solution would be to add a tick box in the
upload campaign for whether the image is part of this sub-competition
or not. It would however also require that the placement of the
wikitext on the image page could be control
A posted a enhancement request based on this at bugzilla [1].
In my view the easiest solution would be to add a tick box in the upload
campaign for whether the image is part of this sub-competition or not. It
would however also require that the placement of the wikitext on the image
page could be
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Jane Darnell wrote:
>
> Well theoretically, the way the monuments lists templates are set up,
> they have their own "type" tags per monument with words like "castle",
> "gate", "barn", "tree", "rock formation", and so forth. WWI could be
> just one of these, and it
Well theoretically, the way the monuments lists templates are set up,
they have their own "type" tags per monument with words like "castle",
"gate", "barn", "tree", "rock formation", and so forth. WWI could be
just one of these, and it would be nice if the upload campaigns could
somehow add categor
You can add a third field witch ads the template if it had a value (or a
certain value) and skip it otherwise.
Still a boolean value in the upload wizard would be really nice.
/Lokal_Profil
Den 8 aug 2013 23:41 skrev "Jane Darnell" :
> I think it would be easier to simply include "World War I"
I think it would be easier to simply include "World War I" (or
whatever language equivalent, depending on the Wikipedia project) in
the description field of the monument in the monuments list. A bot can
then go and put these photos in proper categories for judging (and
also for later browsing). Mos
On 23/07/13 18:14, Michael Maggs wrote:
How will the international jury know which entries are connected in some
way with WW1, as that will often not be obvious from the photo itself.
In the UK, the photos will typically be of old buildings and not obvious
war memorials Presumably an explanation
here might be a lot of these monuments (in every small city) but a lot of
> them wont be eligible for the local contest, how to deal with that?
>
> Mvg,
>
> Bas
>
> > Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:10:47 +0200
> > From: jane...@gmail.com
> > To: wikilovesmonuments@lists
t be eligible for the local contest, how to deal with that?
>
> Mvg,
>
> Bas
>
> > Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:10:47 +0200
> > From: jane...@gmail.com
> > To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Europeana Loves Wiki Loves Mo
2013/7/23 Bas vb :
> Hi all,
>
> Indeed France and Belgium both have many of these monuments, but I believe
> that in France a lot of these wont be monument historique. Due to the fact
> that most of their monuments are really really old and special. (there are
> ca 60.000 monuments in France but t
[Wiki Loves Monuments] Europeana Loves Wiki Loves Monuments
2013 edition
Hiya all,
thanks for the feedback. Of course no topic is going to be perfectly
distributed through countries, that goes equally for GLAM and art nouveau.
However, please note that the definition is pretty wide
ttle bit focused on
>> only some of the countries.
>>
>> So there might be a lot of these monuments (in every small city) but a
>> lot of them wont be eligible for the local contest, how to deal with that?
>>
>> Mvg,
>>
>> Bas
>>
>> > Date:
013 14:10:47 +0200
> > From: jane...@gmail.com
> > To: wikilovesmonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Europeana Loves Wiki Loves Monuments
> 2013 edition
>
> >
> > Àlex,
> > That is great news! I would love to see more WWI monuments and
It’s the same in the UK. Although we have many WW1 memorials, very few of them
are on the official registers as ‘listed buildings’, so are not eligible
subjects for the competition.
Michael
On 23 Jul 2013, at 15:59, Bas vb wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Indeed France and Belgium both have many of th
.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Europeana Loves Wiki Loves Monuments
> 2013 edition
>
> Àlex,
> That is great news! I would love to see more WWI monuments and
> memorials added (especially since I picnic-lunched at many of them
> while on a bike trip throu
Àlex,
That is great news! I would love to see more WWI monuments and
memorials added (especially since I picnic-lunched at many of them
while on a bike trip through Belgium and France several years ago). It
was amazing to me to see how many small towns in Belgium and France
still have yearly ceremo
Hi all,
as some of you may know, I'm now also collaborating with Europeana in their
Wiki-related projects. I have a couple of good announcements to share with
you:
1) Again this year, Europeana will be an official partner of Wiki Loves
Monuments and will sponsor the main prize, as did last year.
30 matches
Mail list logo
