Definitely a cultural thing -I still don't understand why someone can feel
intimidated or harassed by that e-mailI'd better not go into details
because it can be understood as I'm attacking an ethnic/linguistic group of
wikimedians :-)
Sent from Samsung Mobile
Original message -
Interview: Nate Ott: the writer behind 71 articles in the English Wikipedia's
largest-ever good topic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2014-03-19/Interview
Forum: Wikimedia Commons mission: free media for the world or only Wikimedia
projects?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
With respect to Sandole's editing
of the article on [[Opposition to military action against Iran]]
The edit listed in this thread
*
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Opposition_to_military_action_against_Iran&diff=514822741&oldid=514817891
by itself would seem to show undue emphasis on
Before we start thinking about the implications for WiR in general or WMF's
relationship with Stanton, I think we should focus on establishing the facts of
what happened here. After we have a good understanding of the facts we can
discuss the implications.
I'm still waiting for Arbcom to get ba
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Carlos M. Colina
wrote:
> Wait, are we in kindergarden? I think Rupert's email was sent off-list, so
> basically there is no need to bring it up to the list, regardless how
> related it is to the thread. Private discussions between two people should
> remain that,
On 2 January 2014 04:24, James Forrester wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> I would like to invite submissions[0] proposing presentations, panels,
> tutorials and workshops for Wikimania 2014 in London this coming August.
>
> Note that the deadline is the end of March; we hope to have final
> decisions about
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Marc A. Pelletier wrote:
> On 03/22/2014 02:45 PM, Russavia wrote:
>> It's already been established that there is massive copyvio in there,
>> and I think it is absolutely unacceptable for a copyvio to still be in
>> this article under the circumstances.
>
> It's u
Wait, are we in kindergarden? I think Rupert's email was sent off-list,
so basically there is no need to bring it up to the list, regardless how
related it is to the thread. Private discussions between two people
should remain that, _private_, no?
I just don't get it.
M.
El 23/03/2014 04:33 p
I just wanted to chime in here to say that, at least in a vacuum, I found
Rupert's e-mail to be highly inappropriate and I found Nathan's response
to it to be wholly appropriate.
Rupert, I hope to never see a repeat of this incident, in which you
attempt to badger a list participant and Wikimedia
On 23 March 2014 08:32, Michael Snow wrote:
> On 3/23/2014 1:08 AM, Fæ wrote:
>>
>> On 23/03/2014, Michael Snow
>>>
>>> There isn't a legitimate basis for evaluating how the funds are spent
>>> other than A's desires and intentions. It's still a restricted gift, we
>>> can't pretend that this is
"Are charities in the UK prohibited from accepting donations to which any
form of restriction is attached?"
No. It can be quite common.
On 23 Mar 2014 08:33, "Michael Snow" wrote:
> On 3/23/2014 1:08 AM, Fæ wrote:
>
>> On 23/03/2014, Michael Snow
>>
>>> There isn't a legitimate basis for evalua
On 3/23/2014 1:08 AM, Fæ wrote:
On 23/03/2014, Michael Snow
There isn't a legitimate basis for evaluating how the funds are spent
other than A's desires and intentions. It's still a restricted gift, we
can't pretend that this is money from general fundraising and decide it
should have been spen
On 23/03/2014, Michael Snow
> There isn't a legitimate basis for evaluating how the funds are spent
> other than A's desires and intentions. It's still a restricted gift, we
> can't pretend that this is money from general fundraising and decide it
> should have been spent in a way that better fits
On 3/22/2014 2:04 PM, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
Michael Snow wrote:
As such, it seems clear that the donor in question is in the
best position to evaluate whether the funds achieved their
intended purpose. We don't really have good information in
this case to do that for them, and imposing our ide
14 matches
Mail list logo
