11.01.2016 5:42 PM "SarahSV" napisał(a):
>
>
> But a few days ago Dariusz said on this list that he wasn't aware of the
> background of Geshuri's that is causing concern, even though it was fourth
> in a Google search for Geshuri's name.
It was tenth several days ago, in
¡Bienvenido, Jaime!
Walter
Sent from/Enviado desde iPhone
> El ene 11, 2016, a las 15:28, Lila Tretikov escribió:
>
> Dear Wikimedians,
>
>
> Sharing this from our internal WMF list for your visibility...
>
>
>
> I'd like to introduce Jamie Villagomez, our incoming
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:42 PM, SarahSV wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Matthew Flaschen <
> matthew.flasc...@gatech.edu> wrote:
>
>
> > The board had an obligation to fully research both candidates, and insist
> > on more time as needed to do so.
> >
> >
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Dariusz Jemielniak
wrote:
>
> It was tenth several days ago, in Google.com. unfortunate and silly as it
> may sound, it was not in top ten on Google.pl or .de / .it for that matter.
> I'm not making excuses, just stating the fact.
>
> I'm
> Sharing this from our internal WMF list for your visibility...
Thank you, Lila, for sharing this here - this type of announcement has always
been publicly posted on wikimedia-l in the past, so hopefully this level of
transparency will continue in the future. :-)
> I'd like to introduce
I find it amazing – alarming – unbelievable – that some board members knew,
and did not tell the others.
Andreas
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:27 AM, SarahSV wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Dariusz Jemielniak
> wrote:
>
> >
> > It was tenth
+1
to Asaf & Yaroslav. Well put.
Shani.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter
wrote:
> On 2016-01-11 19:37, Asaf Bartov wrote:
>
>> Hello, everyone.
>>
>> It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of advice
>> I
>> have had some past
Michael Peel writes:
>> On 11 Jan 2016, at 18:47, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
>>
>> On 2016-01-11 19:37, Asaf Bartov wrote:
>>> Hello, everyone.
>>> It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of advice I
>>> have had some past
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Matthew Flaschen <
matthew.flasc...@gatech.edu> wrote:
> The board had an obligation to fully research both candidates, and insist
> on more time as needed to do so.
>
> Boryana Dineva, the Foundation's Vice-President of Human Resources
, wrote [1] to this
I just wanted to pile on along with the three +1s I just approved in
the moderation queue.
Austin
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Asaf Bartov wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of advice I
> have had some past
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:27 PM, SarahSV wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Dariusz Jemielniak
>
we're hoping to come back with learning
Dariusz
, I appreciate that you're responding and trying to find out what happened.
>
> Sarah
+1
In the very looong discussion re actions made by the Board, I want to
high-light two comments been made.I see them as good summaries and hope
they can be seen as conclusions and base to look into possible
improvement in processes
Anders
On James removal
2016-01-10 kl. 09:04, by MZMcBride:
As a cross-reference it may be interesting to note here the Conflict of
Interest and Code of Conduct policies that the Wikimedia UK board
applies to its own trustees. These have recently been updated to ensure
compliance with current charity governance best practice recommendations:
Trustee
Ok - I would be really surprised if WMF have discussed Google in their
executive sessions either - given the difficulties around staff and
strategy they probably haven't had five minutes to mention Google, even if
they wanted to. So the most economical hypothesis is that the reason Denny
hasn't
Pete, thanks for bringing up this subject. May I ask you to please do a
lightning talk about this during the Wikipedia Day conference?
Pine
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Pete Forsyth wrote:
> All:
>
> With the expiration of the 2011-2015 Strategic Plan, many of us are
Dariusz,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Dariusz Jemielniak wrote:
>
>
> I'm investigating with the BGC what went wrong with the whole process (that
> some Board members did not have full information) and we're hoping to come
> back with learning from this failure, as it was
All:
With the expiration of the 2011-2015 Strategic Plan, many of us are
interested in future strategic planning efforts. With that in mind (and as
part of a series of interviews I'm doing to celebrate Wikipedia Day), I
interviewed Eugene Eric Kim, who designed the community engagement process
End of an era. It was a pleasure to work with JB and Stu. I'd like to echo
the amusement about them being "outsiders".
At the time when Stu was appointed, he was an editor and has been on the
foundation-l pulse for extended amount of time and was the only board
member interested in the
@NYB: at least one major pension fund has ongoing litigation related to the
nonsolicit, so I agree with you Arnnon is unlikely to be able to comment
publicly.
Best,
KG
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Newyorkbrad wrote:
> It would be great if we could have Arrnon's input
Welcome Jamie, at WMF. Congratulations for being a member of the Wikimedia
family :)
Regards,
Tanweer
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:28 AM, Lila Tretikov wrote:
> Dear Wikimedians,
>
>
> Sharing this from our internal WMF list for your visibility...
>
>
>
> I'd like to
Dear Wikimedians,
Sharing this from our internal WMF list for your visibility...
I'd like to introduce Jamie Villagomez, our incoming Chief Financial
Officer. He brings more than 20 years of experience leading finance in
small startups and large companies, and supporting non-profits as a
Can someone on the Board comment on the Board's general approach to vetting
Trustee candidates?
I would hope that someone neutral is explicitly responsible for reviewing
candidates and providing at least a cursory report to the Board on their
background, qualifications, and any potential
It would be great if we could have Arrnon's input and perspective on
the events that have caused the concern raised in this thread.
However, it's been stated that major shareholder litigation involving
the issue is still pending. If that is so, it is very unlikely that
he's going to be able to
As a "non-technical" Wikimedian, I too would welcome a discussion,
starting with the basics, of what the project formerly known as the
"Knowledge Engine" is, or might become, and the pros and cons of the
WMF focusing major resources on it.
(Perhaps best to put have that discussion in a new
Here is the link for the online streaming:
https://youtu.be/uvfd_HmPOrc
Cheers,
Marco
2016-01-11 16:11 GMT+01:00 Marco Fossati :
> Dear all,
>
> This is a kind reminder for the upcoming StrepHit IEG project kick-off
> seminar.
> Schedule: 15 January 2016, 11:00 am
>
>
Hello, everyone.
It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of advice I
have had some past occasions to offer some newcomers to the movement:
*So you've made a mistake and it's public...*
Step 0:
Understand that there is no point in pretending you have not made a mistake.
On 01/08/2016 12:43 PM, Dariusz Jemielniak wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Pine W wrote:
Dariusz, you said in your statement that was published in the Wikimedia
Blog that WMF "considered dozens of candidates from all over the world,
with not-for-profit and
On 2016-01-11 19:37, Asaf Bartov wrote:
Hello, everyone.
It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of
advice I
have had some past occasions to offer some newcomers to the movement:
<...>
Q: Are you suggesting this applies to current goings-on?
A: I suggest it
> On 11 Jan 2016, at 18:47, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
>
> On 2016-01-11 19:37, Asaf Bartov wrote:
>> Hello, everyone.
>> It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of advice I
>> have had some past occasions to offer some newcomers to the movement:
>
>
On 11 January 2016 at 18:37, Asaf Bartov wrote:
> It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of advice I
> have had some past occasions to offer some newcomers to the movement
That's very good, Is there a version (perhaps generic, rather than
with
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andy Mabbett
wrote:
> On 11 January 2016 at 18:37, Asaf Bartov wrote:
>
> > It occurs to me this might be a good time to recycle this piece of
> advice I
> > have had some past occasions to offer some newcomers
On 2016-01-11 1:37 PM, Asaf Bartov wrote:
"I neglected to look at relevant data before deciding to fund
Wikimedia Antarctica"
But, but... the editathon at McMurdo Station was a resounding success!
-- Marc
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines
2016-01-11 20:58 GMT+01:00 Philippe Beaudette :
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Marc A. Pelletier >
> wrote:
>
> > On 2016-01-11 1:37 PM, Asaf Bartov wrote:
> >
> >> "I neglected to look at relevant data before deciding to fund
> >>
On 11 January 2016 at 19:58, Philippe Beaudette wrote:
> Plus I know of at least one donation made from Antarctica, that year i ran
> the fundraiser... If that isn't enough to justify chapter creation
And, of course, after much prodding from Lodewijk, in 2013 we had:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Marc A. Pelletier
wrote:
> On 2016-01-11 1:37 PM, Asaf Bartov wrote:
>
>> "I neglected to look at relevant data before deciding to fund
>> Wikimedia Antarctica"
>>
>
> But, but... the editathon at McMurdo Station was a resounding success!
>
>
35 matches
Mail list logo