Just as a matter of record: While I did contribute comments to the concept
of the council, and am in general very much in favour of such council, I
also made the comment that I don't think the council in its current shape
addresses the real problems at all - because it has one responsibility
+1 to the idea of developing a movement strategic plan, we can than judge
how well different movement partners including the WMF are aligned with
movements goals
--
James Heilman
MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine
www.opentextbookofmedicine.com
Thank you Milos for pointing here what seems to me the most fundamental
flaw of our current organisation.
The WMF as organisation was created to bring stability and assure that
the daily business is done: keep the platform online, deal with legal
cases and keep a positive financial balance. This
On Jan 12, 2016 16:51, "Yaroslav M. Blanter" wrote:
>
> On 2016-01-12 04:21, Pete Forsyth wrote:
>>
>> All:
>>
>>
>>
>> And beyond this video -- what do those who participated in the last round
>> (or those who have observed it) think the important lessons are? How
should
>> we
2016-01-12 9:12 GMT+01:00 Pine W :
> Pardon the skepticism, but as you may have heard, it seems that some
> changes are need in WMF screening procedures, and this skepticism is
> understandably affecting other new requisitions.
>
> In any case, welcome to the hurricane known
Welcome Jaime!!
K.
On Tuesday, 12 January 2016, Cristian Consonni
wrote:
> 2016-01-12 9:12 GMT+01:00 Pine W >:
> > Pardon the skepticism, but as you may have heard, it seems that some
> > changes are need in WMF screening procedures,
On 11 January 2016 at 20:28, Lila Tretikov wrote:
>
> Most recently, Jaime served as CFO at two startups: AnyCOMM, a smart cities
> startup,
Looks like literal DRMed light-bulbs.
> and Karum Group, which focused on extending credit services to
> underserved, unbanked
Hi Jamie,
Pardon the skepticism, but as you may have heard, it seems that some
changes are need in WMF screening procedures, and this skepticism is
understandably affecting other new requisitions.
In any case, welcome to the hurricane known as the Wikimedia movement (:
I look forward to hearing
Correction made on page:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2016_Strategy/Communities
as follows:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=2016_Strategy%2FCommunities=revision=15232863=15227414
FYI, for the any translation of that page completed already.
K.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:11 PM,
>
> I hope this helps. :)
>
>
Hi Damon - not really, it doesn't.
If there is anything that you feel you can and should say publically
(bearing in mind whatever confidentiality you have agreed to respect, or
feel you should respect ) - then please say it.
If there isn't - then please don't hint
On 01/12/2016 06:36 PM, Damon Sicore wrote:
> These are links to public posts containing cryptographic hash values
> generated from documents that I wrote on or before the dates of the
> posts. By posting these hash values publicly, I’m proving to the
> world that I said something specific at a
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:25 PM, John Mark Vandenberg
wrote:
>
> Also agree.
>
> I'd like to see strategic plan for the movement done first, and then
> one undertaken for the Foundation when the 'movement's plan is
> finished.
>
>
That has long been one of my take-aways from
'On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Anna Stillwell
wrote:
> I like the idea of a strategic plan for the movement and one for the
> Foundation.
> I think that is a good idea.
Also agree.
I'd like to see strategic plan for the movement done first, and then
one undertaken
Welcome, Jaime!
-Hasive
WMBD
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Kalliope Tsouroupidou <
ktsouroupi...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Welcome Jaime!!
>
> K.
>
> On Tuesday, 12 January 2016, Cristian Consonni
> wrote:
>
> > 2016-01-12 9:12 GMT+01:00 Pine W
I like the idea of a strategic plan for the movement and one for the
Foundation.
I think that is a good idea.
/a
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Pete Forsyth
wrote:
> Thank you for the reflections, Yaroslav, Specific replies inline below.
>
> Pine, thank you for the
Thank you for the reflections, Yaroslav, Specific replies inline below.
Pine, thank you for the invitation; actually, this video was done in
preparation for my panel session at the Wikipedia 15 celebration, which
will also be live-streamed later in the day. Eugene will be one of my
panelists, and
Hello, all. :)
As I know many of you are aware, the strategic planning consultation pages
went up on Meta yesterday at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2016_Strategy/Community_consultation. The
actual consultation should launch on January 18th. Right now, we are
seeking translations.
I've
On 2016-01-12 04:21, Pete Forsyth wrote:
All:
And beyond this video -- what do those who participated in the last
round
(or those who have observed it) think the important lessons are? How
should
we be moving foward?
-Pete
[[User:Peteforsyth]]
I did not watch the video, but I did
I thank you! :D I used the "notify translators" option on Meta, but wasn't
quite sure where it sent notifications to.
Maggie
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Vira Motorko
wrote:
> I dare to send this to translators-l :)
>
>
>
>
> *2016-01-12 17:11 GMT+02:00 Maggie
(perhaps it would be nice to stop wasting everyone's time with this.)
A.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Nathan wrote:
> I've written a guess on what Damon is hinting at. I will reveal this guess
> at some later date, but for now here is the hash value:
>
>
>
On 13/01/16 04:36, Damon Sicore wrote:
> Hi Doma,
>
> These are links to public posts containing cryptographic hash
> values generated from documents that I wrote on or before the dates
> of the posts. By posting these hash values publicly, I’m proving
> to the world that I said something
Milos,
I find a lot in your email to agree with.
The Board of the Wikimedia Foundation, in my understanding, is not the top
governance body of the Wikimedia movement. It sometimes stands in for that,
because we don't have anything better - but its composition and its legal
obligations suggest
Denny, thanks for supporting this issue moving on. Before few remarks
I would respond inline, I want to say that the *draft* of the idea to
make community assembly have been published by Pharos:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Community_Council_Compact
I want to give a small background
Damon, for those who are not native in gibberish, care to translate?
Cheers,
Doma
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Damon Sicore wrote:
> To All,
>
> Just to mark this moment, or maybe remind those who paid attention when I
> published these, some long before I vanished in
I dare to send this to translators-l :)
*2016-01-12 17:11 GMT+02:00 Maggie Dennis >:*
> Hello, all. :)
>
As I know many of you are aware, the strategic planning consultation pages
> went up on Meta yesterday at
>
Hi Doma,
These are links to public posts containing cryptographic hash values generated
from documents that I wrote on or before the dates of the posts. By posting
these hash values publicly, I’m proving to the world that I said something
specific at a specific time. The world does not know
26 matches
Mail list logo