Sorry, missed the memo on WiDaR - looks *very* impressive - thanks Gerard!
2014/1/24, Gerard Meijssen :
> Hoi,
> As I recall it there is a category with Russian female painters.. Using
> "Widar" [1] and identifying them as a painter and a female takes all of 5
> minutes..
> Thanks,
> GerardM
Hoi,
As I recall it there is a category with Russian female painters.. Using
"Widar" [1] and identifying them as a painter and a female takes all of 5
minutes..
Thanks,
GerardM
[1] http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/autolist.html
On 24 January 2014 13:40, Jane Darnell wrote:
> Magnus
Magnus, you are magical as always, thanks!
What an odd list though - who has been working so diligently on
Russian paintresses? Whoever you are, great work!
meanwhile, sending more virtual kudos to Magnus while I dig into these results,
Jane
2014/1/24, Magnus Manske :
> A list of female painters w
A list of female painters with no article on en.wp:
http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/autolist.html?q=claim%5B106%3A1028181%5D%20and%20claim%5B21%3A6581072%5D%20%20and%20nolink%5Benwiki%5D
(might take a few seconds to load)
Cheers,
Magnus
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Jane Darnell wrot
Hoi,
You are conflating two tools .. they are still quite distinct..
- What you refer to is a query tool and IT provides you with the numbers
you quote.
- Reasonator provides you with a search functionality and a display
functionality
So Reasonator gives you something like this [1]
Th
I am not convinced that this is useful (yet). I have been generating
some red-link lists for the upcoming international edit-a-thon about
Art & Feminism on February 1st, and I tried out this tool to see if I
could come with with lists of women artists already in other projects.
With Reasonator I se
On 23 January 2014 15:42, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> On 23 January 2014 15:12, Magnus Manske
> wrote:
> >
> > I thought about that as well. Besides the intro text, the info box would
> be
> > the main "attraction"; but if infoboxes were to fall back on wikidata
> > information, which they could techn
On 23 January 2014 15:12, Magnus Manske wrote:
>
> I thought about that as well. Besides the intro text, the info box would be
> the main "attraction"; but if infoboxes were to fall back on wikidata
> information, which they could technically already do, all we'd have to do
> is add a blank infobo
Hoi,
We can provide information now(ish). We are discussing draft because it is
a likely avenue. It is however very much NOT intended for the English
Wikipedia. If anything it would be much better if we work this out on other
Wikipedias first.
The most benefit from Reasonator will be for the bott
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Daniel Mietchen <
daniel.mietc...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> What about having the Reasonator sit in the Draft namespace, with a
> link from the search results or the text preloaded for non-existing
> pages in the main namespace?
>
> Daniel
>
It is still far too ear
On Jan 23, 2014 6:42 PM, "Gerard Meijssen"
wrote:
>
> Hoi,
> Having Reasonator generated content in a "draft" namespace is *NOT* a bad
> idea.
>
>- I do not know enough about the draft namespace.. Is there a way to
>discover that an article exists in Draft ??
>- My personal target for
Hoi,
Having Reasonator generated content in a "draft" namespace is *NOT* a bad
idea.
- I do not know enough about the draft namespace.. Is there a way to
discover that an article exists in Draft ??
- My personal target for this functionality is very much the smaller
projects. By using
What about having the Reasonator sit in the Draft namespace, with a
link from the search results or the text preloaded for non-existing
pages in the main namespace?
Daniel
--
http://www.naturkundemuseum-berlin.de/en/institution/mitarbeiter/mietchen-daniel/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Daniel
Hi Andy,
I thought about that as well. Besides the intro text, the info box would be
the main "attraction"; but if infoboxes were to fall back on wikidata
information, which they could technically already do, all we'd have to do
is add a blank infobox, and it should automatically fill up with the
On 22 January 2014 08:35, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> There are many ways to skin a cat. The most obvious
> one is to add a {{Reasonator}} template as a place
> holder in a Wikipedia. Another is to capture a not
> found or a red link and insert Reasonator info. What
> I am trying to do is to give a
Hoi,
The mail I send is meant to be a warning in advance. If you are interested
in the "Reasonator", it is in continuous development and information is
provided on an almost daily basis. When you have read it, you may
understand the potential it has. It will help you understand why it can
have a p
Can you explain how such a {{Reasonator}} template would actually work. You
say that it would be a stand-in until the article was actually written, but
how would it know when the article is actually written? Is there a way to
access the target article's state via Lua?
From a community perspective,
Hoi,
Given that Reasonator requests services through Javascript, it will likely
piggy back on the Wikidata infrastructure. As caching is as far as I know
not implemented on Wikidata, it will benefit everyone when caching for
Wikidata gets on the WMF-Ops agenda.
Until now Wikidata is considered to
On a technical note, Reasonator is pure JavaScript, so should be easily
portable, even to a Wikipedia:Reasonator.js page (or several pages, with
support JS).
git here:
https://bitbucket.org/magnusmanske/reasonator
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Ryan Lane wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:17
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> Hoi,
>
> At this moment Wikipedia "red links" provide no information whatsoever.
> This is not cool.
>
> In Wikidata we often have labels for the missing (=red link) articles. We
> can and do provide information from Wikidata in a reasonabl
20 matches
Mail list logo