In some cases we need to attribute content created on external sites, and
reused on Wikimedia-sites. In Norway Åndsverksloven says "The creator has
the right to be named according to good practice" ("Opphavsmannen har krav
på å bli navngitt slik som god skikk tilsier") and for our content that is
g
but the information is exactly the same, url, date, author, title - the
refn template can include anything you need to add including license detail
ie cc-by all of which can be internal or external links
On 28 August 2017 at 00:26, John Erling Blad wrote:
> Citation and reuse is two different th
We have a number of source specific templates, such as {{EB1911}} for
acknowledging re-used source material. There is as yet no automatic
mechanism for changing these as and when the actual copying is replaced
entirely.
On 28 Aug 2017 01:18, "Gnangarra" wrote:
> but the information is exactly
Hoi,
With all due respect. These templates are probably English Wikipedia only.
Consequently they are not available on a Wikimedia level.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 29 August 2017 at 13:39, Richard Farmbrough
wrote:
> We have a number of source specific templates, such as {{EB1911}} for
> acknowl
Kaya
With all due respect if there are potential solutions already created then
it doent matter which project or what language they are on they can be
adapted and translated as necessary, even made global
On 29 August 2017 at 19:53, Gerard Meijssen
wrote:
> Hoi,
> With all due respect. These
Stright from the Norwegian Åndsverksloven
§ 3. The author is entitled to be named as good practice, as well as on
copies of the intellectual property as when made available to the public.
Good practice on Wikipedia is a reference in the page history.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 3:35 AM, Gnangarra w
There is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:CC-notice on en at least
specifically for the purpose of incorporating text licensed cc-by content
within articles
On 27 August 2017 at 21:28, John Erling Blad wrote:
> In some cases we need to attribute content created on external sites, and
> reu
Use of a template does not accurately identify the copied text, and in this
case nor the author.
The license is the contract with the author and the reason why the text can
be copied. If the license says the author shall be identified, the by
attribution clause, then a link to the site is not good
that notice states that text has been used, a specific citation where the
text would add context by using https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Refn
On 27 August 2017 at 22:22, John Erling Blad wrote:
> Use of a template does not accurately identify the copied text, and in this
> case nor the a
Citation and reuse is two different things.
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Gnangarra wrote:
> that notice states that text has been used, a specific citation where the
> text would add context by using https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> Template:Refn
>
> On 27 August 2017 at 22:22, John Erling B
10 matches
Mail list logo