"Nikerabbit" changed the status of MediaWiki.r114799 to "ok"
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/114799
Old status: new
New status: ok
Commit summary for MediaWiki.r114799:
Remove support for deleted Wikia MediaWiki extension.
_
"Nikerabbit" changed the status of MediaWiki.r114798 to "ok"
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/114798
Old status: new
New status: ok
Commit summary for MediaWiki.r114798:
Update tags.
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
medi
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 7:26 PM, John Du Hart wrote:
>> Meanwhile, dont waste your time coding something we are most certainly
>> never going to use.
> Statements like that from WMF staff are hurtful towards volunteer
> developers. Don't turn this into another MobileFrontend situation.
Antoine's
MediaWiki Bugzilla Report for April 02, 2012 - April 09, 2012
Status changes this week
Bugs NEW : 281
Bugs ASSIGNED : 21
Bugs REOPENED : 38
Bugs RESOLVED
On 04/08/2012 10:23 PM, John Du Hart wrote:
> So what happened to considering Phabricator in the future?
That evaluation is going to happen in June. It's on the roadmap for us
to lead then: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Roadmap#Platform
--
Sumana Harihareswara
Volunteer Development Coordinator
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Antoine Musso wrote:
> Meanwhile, dont waste your time coding something we are most certainly
> never going to use.
Statements like that from WMF staff are hurtful towards volunteer
developers. Don't turn this into another MobileFrontend situation.
--
John
_
So what happened to considering Phabricator in the future?
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Platonides wrote:
> On 08/04/12 22:49, Daniel Friesen wrote:
- The project needs a good database system. I copied our database
classes in but never got to using them. I'm isolating all database st
On 08/04/12 22:49, Daniel Friesen wrote:
>>> - The project needs a good database system. I copied our database
>>> classes in but never got to using them. I'm isolating all database stuff
>>> into some model classes so different database handing can be swapped in.
>>> Anyone who feels up to it can
Hey,
> We can allow people to push directly in the repository without having
Gerrit to "intercept" the commit.
Right, I looked a bit through gerrits docs and figured I actually have the
rights for my extensions to enable myself to do this, using this stuff:
https://review.typo3.org/Documentation
On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:32:07 -0700, Platonides
wrote:
You're a brave soul!
Can we get a labs project for testing that in real time?
I'm not sure about the personal public remotes. If we're going to
continue with our way of contribution, we would have continuous bases.
OTOH it looks cool to
You're a brave soul!
Can we get a labs project for testing that in real time?
I'm not sure about the personal public remotes. If we're going to
continue with our way of contribution, we would have continuous bases.
OTOH it looks cool to be able to work A1--A2--B1--B2 without creating
new branches
Le 08/04/12 14:44, Daniel Friesen wrote :
> We're using gerrit now. And as we use it we all keep running into issues
> stemming fundamentally from how gerrit is designed.
Hello Daniel,
We already had the experience of writing a code review tool from scratch
and although it filled a need at that
Le 08/04/12 14:44, Daniel Friesen a écrit :
> anyone who feels that a framework they know fits best and wants to make
> the review system use it (Though no file layout controlling MVC
> frameworks, please).
For a PHP framework, have a look at Symfony:
http://www.symfony-project.org/
If I wanted
On 04/08/2012 03:40 PM, Antoine Musso wrote:
> Le 08/04/12 20:27, Jeroen De Dauw a écrit :
>> Most of my extensions have been migrated to the new git setup with gerrit.
>> I'm not happy with the workflow for the extensions where I'm basically the
>> only real contributor or those where no one is go
Le 08/04/12 20:27, Jeroen De Dauw a écrit :
> Most of my extensions have been migrated to the new git setup with gerrit.
> I'm not happy with the workflow for the extensions where I'm basically the
> only real contributor or those where no one is going to review my stuff
> anyway. Although I can ap
2012/4/8 Erik Zachte
> Hi Lars,
>
> You have a point here, especially for smaller projects:
>
> For Swedish Wikisource:
>
> zcat sampled-1000.log-20120404.gz | grep 'GET http://sv.wikisource.org' |
> awk '{print $9, $11,$14}'
>
> returns 20 lines from this 1:1000 sampled squid log file
> after r
Hi Lars,
You have a point here, especially for smaller projects:
For Swedish Wikisource:
zcat sampled-1000.log-20120404.gz | grep 'GET http://sv.wikisource.org' |
awk '{print $9, $11,$14}'
returns 20 lines from this 1:1000 sampled squid log file
after removing javascript/json/robots.txt there
Hey,
Most of my extensions have been migrated to the new git setup with gerrit.
I'm not happy with the workflow for the extensions where I'm basically the
only real contributor or those where no one is going to review my stuff
anyway. Although I can approve my own changes and merge them in, this i
There's no check for the existance of macros.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
I wasn't able to make the selenium work (presumably selenium 1.0).
How hard would it be to make this work? Who would be responsible of
sorting out any problems encountered doing that and ensuring all
developers can locally run those tests?
(Actually, I'd try this before creating too many tests in t
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jean-Frédéric
wrote:
> * If not, would you advise us to restrict this type of uploads to trusted
> users? [4]
>
Just a minor note on this point: we don't currently have any support
for per-group uploads. Ideally you would have some sort of array
with the key being
Hi dear tech folks,
The MediaWiki 1.18 release notes stated the following:
“(bug 24230 [1]) Uploads of ZIP types, such as MS Office or OpenOffice can
now be safely enabled. A ZIP file reader was added which can scan a ZIP
file for potentially dangerous Java applets. This allows applets to be
bloc
"Xqt" changed the status of pywikipedia.r10097 to "deferred"
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10097
Old status: new
New status: deferred
Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10097:
update language_by_size from trunk r10094
___
M
"Xqt" changed the status of pywikipedia.r10094 to "deferred"
URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/pywikipedia/10094
Old status: new
New status: deferred
Commit summary for pywikipedia.r10094:
update language_by_size
___
MediaWiki-CodeRevie
On 26/03/12 11:25, Niklas Laxström wrote:
> * pretty formatting of core message files [BLOCKER]
>
> Now the last issue is something I want your opinion on:
> Is it an issue if we drop pretty formatting of non-English message files?
> If it is an issue, I request your help to make the
> maintenance
-- tl;dr start --
We're using gerrit now. And as we use it we all keep running into issues
stemming fundamentally from how gerrit is designed.
I had an irc discussion with Roan[1] awhile ago tossing around ideas on
how we would write a review system for git if we wrote one from scratch.
Base
On 05/04/12 10:53, Daniel Friesen wrote:
> I thought this might be problematic to have everyone install. But
> thinking about it again. Gerrit is the one doing merges. If that can
> handle the RELEASE-NOTES format that we uses. Then theoretically
> installing it on the server gerrit uses and then c
Hey all,
thanks for your replies. Unfortunately I wasn't able to read them until
today, so the "official" GSoC proposal has now been sent off. That said,
I'm no less enthusiastic about reaching out to knowledgeable people
involved with translation, and, if necessary, adapting the way GSoC works
ou
Hello,
Yep, generating the wodnet itself is a challenging and interesting
project. I was simply commenting on the Lucene part, i.e. on possible
application.
Currently the lucene backend works by employing some very general rules
(e.g. titles get highest score, then first sentence in article
HI Kalan,
You might want to read
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Multichill/Next_generation_categories
Maarten
Op 6-4-2012 17:11, Kalan schreef:
Hello,
I present a proposal for a system that is going to solve the category
intersection problem (and, in fact, allow all set-theory oper
30 matches
Mail list logo
