On 7 June 2012 00:46, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
So far it seems to be working fine. We're seeing some edits being made
over IPv6, and IPv6 traffic is in the low tens of Mbps range.
At the very least, all pywikipedia bots on the toolserver will edit over
IPv6 - and I think a lot of
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Bergi a.d.be...@web.de wrote:
But I thought there was a possibility to push to our repository without
using Gerrit / being affected by Gerrit at all?
I can understand that Gerrit is a nice review tool which is useful for the
production and master branches, but
I'm not sure if it makes sense to have the Labs/OpenStack/Nova management
interface on this same new wikitech wiki though. This means that all the
community projects running inside labs will/might use this same wiki to
document
their internal structure - which can (and should be) a lot of
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:30 AM, John W. Foster jfoster81...@verizon.net wrote:
So now I'm asking you guys. Any interest?
Interested yes...but I use the Debian stable to run my servers, and have
adopted the process of using the tarballs myself as there is absolutely
no reason to use a
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 09:26:25AM +0200, Merlijn van Deen wrote:
On 7 June 2012 00:46, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
So far it seems to be working fine. We're seeing some edits being made
over IPv6, and IPv6 traffic is in the low tens of Mbps range.
At the very least, all
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28339 has been just sitting
their stale for quite a while. I know as a toolserver user, that there is a
potential for a lot of useful tools. Who do I need to bribe or murder in
order to facilitate this process?
John
On 6 June 2012 23:53, Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org wrote:
By the way, I noticed today that this page exists and is in sore need
of updating:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Running_MediaWiki_on_Debian_GNU/Linux
- d.
___
Wikitech-l
On Jun 7, 2012, at 4:15 PM, John wrote:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28339 has been just sitting
their stale for quite a while. I know as a toolserver user, that there is a
potential for a lot of useful tools. Who do I need to bribe or murder in
order to facilitate this
On Jun 7, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Ryan Lane wrote:
I'm not sure if it makes sense to have the Labs/OpenStack/Nova management
interface on this same new wikitech wiki though. This means that all the
community projects running inside labs will/might use this same wiki to
document
their internal
I don't understand why? Wikitech is a perfect place for bots
documentation as well, especially when it comes to large bots operated
by many people, these needs to have documentation so that they can be
overtaken by someone else in case the original person who launched
bot, doesn't have a time to
There is a difference between wikimedia projects which are somehow
related to wikimedia projects, and foundation projects which are
funded by foundation. But this difference is only about people and
money, so why should we have a different wiki for that
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Petr Bena
I wanted to say volunteer projects which are affiliated with various
wikimedia projects
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a difference between wikimedia projects which are somehow
related to wikimedia projects, and foundation projects which are
funded
We should kill those distro-specific pages and I've been saying that for
years. Most of the advice ends up being rather generic, it forks the
content, and they generally end up being abandoned and out of date.
-Chad
On Jun 7, 2012 10:26 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 June 2012
I agree with Petr, I see no reason to put them on different wikis.
Namespaces are cheap.
-Chad
On Jun 7, 2012 11:20 AM, Petr Bena benap...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand why? Wikitech is a perfect place for bots
documentation as well, especially when it comes to large bots operated
by
On 7 June 2012 16:26, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
We should kill those distro-specific pages and I've been saying that for
years. Most of the advice ends up being rather generic, it forks the
content, and they generally end up being abandoned and out of date.
*Not while they need to
Hello everyone,
It’s with great pleasure that I’m announcing that Adam Wight has joined
the Wikimedia Foundation as a Fundraising Engineer.
Before joining us, Adam was customizing open-source web services for
non-profits at Giant Rabbit. This makes him the first Fundraising
On 06/07/2012 12:55 PM, David Gerard wrote:
I'll start hacking that page to bits, on the assumption that it needs
burning and starting over. What is Debian's mailing list for
MediaWiki? I went looking for it and couldn't find it ...
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mediawiki-devel/
Welcome Terry! Welcome to WMF and to fundraising, from my past experiences
I know you'll have fun :).
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Terry Chay tc...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hello everyone,
It’s with great pleasure that I’m announcing that Adam Wight has joined
the Wikimedia Foundation as a
On 7 June 2012 18:07, Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org wrote:
On 06/07/2012 12:55 PM, David Gerard wrote:
I'll start hacking that page to bits, on the assumption that it needs
burning and starting over. What is Debian's mailing list for
MediaWiki? I went looking for it and couldn't find
On 07/06/12 00:53, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
I'd happily add hooks they needed to remove the need of patching for
MediaWiki packagers, or including a script to move if that's what they
really want.
Packaging is happening right now. Look at the patches they're making
here:
Once figured out, might be a good idea to add them to:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jonathan_de_Boyne_Pollard/Guide_to_blocking_IP_version_6_addresses
DJ
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Brad Jorsch
b-jor...@alum.northwestern.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 09:26:25AM +0200, Merlijn
The first IPv6 edit to English Wikipedia required suppression, I have been
advised, so I think there are some valid concerns about the implications
this change will have on vandalism management.
Does nobody else see the issues associated with having what little guidance
there is about IPv6 locked
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/06/12 00:53, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
I'd happily add hooks they needed to remove the need of patching for
MediaWiki packagers, or including a script to move if that's what they
really want.
Packaging is happening
On 06/07/2012 01:45 PM, Platonides wrote:
So yes, I'm happy we are improving collaboration packagers - upstream.
Thanks for looking at it! I'll make sure they see your comments.
Mark.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
I clearly am FAR too spacy today ;) Obviously Welcome ADAM Terry was
already welcomed a while ago :P
James
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:33 AM, James Alexander
jalexan...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
Welcome Terry! Welcome to WMF and to fundraising, from my past experiences
I know you'll have fun :).
Welcome Adam, it's great to have you aboard :)
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:27 AM, James Alexander
jalexan...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
I clearly am FAR too spacy today ;) Obviously Welcome ADAM Terry was
already welcomed a while ago :P
James
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:33 AM, James Alexander
On 07/06/12 20:35, Arthur Richards wrote:
Welcome Adam, it's great to have you aboard :)
Welcome, Adam Wight.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
On 07/06/12 16:04, Brad Jorsch wrote:
At the very least, all pywikipedia bots on the toolserver will edit over
IPv6 - and I think a lot of the non-pywikipedia bots also, unless they
resolve IP addresses manually. Of course, they won't edit anonymously,
so you'll only see it in the access logs.
Chad wrote:
I agree with Petr, I see no reason to put them on different wikis.
Namespaces are cheap.
Namespaces are usually a pain in the ass. Sj's post on the subject:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikimedia.orgdiff=365735
6oldid=3657294#Separating_the_wheat_from_the_chaff.
Risker wrote:
The first IPv6 edit to English Wikipedia required suppression, I have been
advised, so I think there are some valid concerns about the implications
this change will have on vandalism management.
Does nobody else see the issues associated with having what little guidance
there
Namespaces are usually a pain in the ass. Sj's post on the subject:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikimedia.orgdiff=365735
6oldid=3657294#Separating_the_wheat_from_the_chaff.
From his post: ... but that would address many of the reasons that people
fragment what are
Hi all,
Thanks to everyone who contributed user stories about ways that would
like to see OAuth incorporated into MediaWiki!
A few of us here at WMF have looked at the stories, and I've distilled
them down to some general statements about what it seems like the
community wants from the project
On 07/06/12 03:36, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
The Foundation has made MediaWiki available for everyone and that's a
great thing. But Wikimedia's funding comes from donations as a result
of requests on Wikipedia, not from distribution of MediaWiki, so they
are rightly focused on their
33 matches
Mail list logo
