(Sorry, I posted this in the wrong thread a few minutes ago.)
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Yusuke Matsubara whym at whym.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l wrote:
** On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Amir E. Aharoni
*** amir.aharoni at mail.huji.ac.il
Ignore my last post - I appended it to the wrong thread.
Anthony Cole http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anthonyhcole
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
- I think this ML top-posts. Not sure.
- Suspect that the Flow extension would allow for more flexibility, including
attaching multiple discussion threads to a specific edit or paragraph.
--
svetlana
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, at 19:25, Anthony Cole wrote:
(Sorry, I posted this in the wrong thread a
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, at 19:25, Anthony Cole wrote:
On Wed Nov 12 01:05:26 UTC 2014 I asked this list if the technical team
could help the patrollers of recent changes to Wikipedia's medical articles
“...tag the log entry of revisions ... as having been reviewed for
policy/guideline compliance
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Yusuke Matsubara w...@whym.org wrote:
...
A more promising approach might be (re-)using tags [1] - AbuseFilter
and a few other tools (such as HHVM) add tags to revisions, and
RecentChanges can (already) be filtered by tags. Is there an
implementation that
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:59 AM, James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
A paragraph-level diff means that you only get an edit conflict if two
people change the same paragraph. A character-level diff would mean,
then,
that you only get a conflict if they change the same
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:00 AM, James Forrester jforres...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
No. The Drafts extension (and any feature that puts hidden content on the
servers) was veto'ed years ago by Legal. We need to stop beating this dead
horse.
If that is the case, it should be expressed more
Happy Monday!
We did it. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org now contains all the Bugzilla
reports. If you need to check the original Bugzilla, it can be found at
https://old-bugzilla-wikimedia.org (never mind the certificate warning, it
will go away today or so).
Important notes:
* If your
On 24/11/14 07:41, Quim Gil wrote:
Happy Monday!
We did it. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org now contains all the Bugzilla
reports. If you need to check the original Bugzilla, it can be found at
https://old-bugzilla-wikimedia.org (never mind the certificate warning, it
will go away today or
