- I think this ML top-posts. Not sure. - Suspect that the Flow extension would allow for more flexibility, including attaching multiple discussion threads to a specific edit or paragraph.
-- svetlana On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, at 19:25, Anthony Cole wrote: > (Sorry, I posted this in the wrong thread a few minutes ago.) > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:57 PM, Yusuke Matsubara <whym at whym.org > <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l>> wrote: > >** On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Amir E. Aharoni > **>* <amir.aharoni at mail.huji.ac.il > <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l>> wrote: > *>>* I tried looking for it in Bugzilla; I expected to find a two-digit bug > for > *>>* it, but I couldn't find any at all. Of course it's possible that I didn't > *>>* look well enough. > *>>* A bit different, but there is an extension that enables > *>* "supplementing" additional non-modifiable edit summaries: > *>* https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:RevisionCommentSupplement > <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:RevisionCommentSupplement> > *>>* It was contributed (without a Bugzilla request) by Burthsceh, a > *>* volunteer at Japanese Wikipedia, prompted by the necessity to fix > *>* attributions made in edit summaries (for reused texts). [1] I don't > *>* think it has been extensively reviewed, though. > *>>* With that approach, you could effectively modify an edit summary by > *>* appending a modified one and rev-deleting the original one. > *>>* [1] > https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:%E4%BA%95%E6%88%B8%E7%AB%AF/subj/%E5%B1%A5%E6%AD%B4%E3%83%9A%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B8%E3%81%AE%E5%80%8B%E3%80%85%E3%81%AE%E7%89%88%E3%81%AB%E5%AF%BE%E3%81%97%E3%81%A6%E8%BF%BD%E5%8A%A0%E3%81%AE%E3%82%B3%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88%E3%82%92%E8%A1%A8%E7%A4%BA%E3%81%99%E3%82%8B%E6%96%B9%E6%B3%95%E3%81%AE%E5%B0%8E%E5%85%A5%E3%81%AE%E6%8F%90%E6%A1%88 > <https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:%E4%BA%95%E6%88%B8%E7%AB%AF/subj/%E5%B1%A5%E6%AD%B4%E3%83%9A%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B8%E3%81%AE%E5%80%8B%E3%80%85%E3%81%AE%E7%89%88%E3%81%AB%E5%AF%BE%E3%81%97%E3%81%A6%E8%BF%BD%E5%8A%A0%E3%81%AE%E3%82%B3%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88%E3%82%92%E8%A1%A8%E7%A4%BA%E3%81%99%E3%82%8B%E6%96%B9%E6%B3%95%E3%81%AE%E5%B0%8E%E5%85%A5%E3%81%AE%E6%8F%90%E6%A1%88> > * > > > On Wed Nov 12 01:05:26 UTC 2014 I asked this list if the technical team > could help the patrollers of recent changes to Wikipedia's medical articles > “...tag the log entry of revisions ... as having been reviewed for > policy/guideline compliance by a trusted editor.” [1] > > I am quite technically illiterate and may have misunderstood, but judging > by Yusuke Matsubara's description, the extension he mentions above seems > like it might fit our needs. Will it enable patrollers to add a comment to > the edit summary? Does anyone know if it works on en.Wikipedia? > > 1.https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2014-November/079418.html > > > Anthony Cole <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anthonyhcole> > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
