On Wed, 08 May 2013 03:52:07 -0700, Daniel Friesen
dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
I was going through our code contemplating dropping XHTML 1.1 support
and ran into the RDFa support stuff and realized how out of date and
limited it is.
I've put together an RFC for replacing our code
On Wed, 08 May 2013 03:52:07 -0700, Daniel Friesen
dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
I was going through our code contemplating dropping XHTML 1.1 support
and ran into the RDFa support stuff and realized how out of date and
limited it is.
I've put together an RFC for replacing our code
Well I don't have any experience in RDFa, but looking at the proposal, it
seems like something we should do.
*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Daniel Friesen
On 9 May 2013 18:29, Daniel Friesen dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
On Wed, 08 May 2013 03:52:07 -0700, Daniel Friesen
dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
I was going through our code contemplating dropping XHTML 1.1 support and
ran into the RDFa support stuff and realized how out of date
I was going through our code contemplating dropping XHTML 1.1 support and
ran into the RDFa support stuff and realized how out of date and limited
it is.
I've put together an RFC for replacing our code that appears to be based
on the RDFa 1.0 from 2008 with RDFa 1.1 and expanding support
