Hi,
You may have followed the discussion on Wikimedia-l (and enwiki-l).
For a mere intellectual curiosity I would like to know why hashing the IPs
with a varying salt won't work.
Wouldn't that provide a way to obfuscate IP addresses while maintaining
uniqueness (i. e. a given IP gets alway hashe
Things that come to my mind:
*range blocks become impossible, and its impossible to tell if vandals are
using near by ips
*cant do a whois on the ip to see if its a library or something
Suppose those first two come down to the drawback of not knowing the ip is
you dont know the ip
More importantl
This has been discussed countless times.
Some links for starters: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T20981
Nemo
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
2015-04-05 17:31 GMT+02:00 Brian Wolff :
> Things that come to my mind:
> *range blocks become impossible, and its impossible to tell if vandals are
> using near by ips
> *cant do a whois on the ip to see if its a library or something
Oh, I didn't think about this!
What about:
* creating a new pe
Cristian Consonni schreef op 2015/04/08 om 3:00:
2015-04-05 17:31 GMT+02:00 Brian Wolff :
Things that come to my mind:
*range blocks become impossible, and its impossible to tell if vandals are
using near by ips
*cant do a whois on the ip to see if its a library or something
Oh, I didn't think
2015-04-08 16:11 GMT+02:00 Kevin Wayne Williams :
>> What about:
>> * creating a new permission group (say "IP watchers") that can see the
>> IP in non-hashed form?
>> * compile some sort of list and automatically tagging edits from
>> schools and libraries? (this could be useful regardless of hash
On Apr 8, 2015 11:12 AM, "Kevin Wayne Williams"
wrote:
>
> Cristian Consonni schreef op 2015/04/08 om 3:00:
>
>> 2015-04-05 17:31 GMT+02:00 Brian Wolff :
>>>
>>> Things that come to my mind:
>>> *range blocks become impossible, and its impossible to tell if vandals
are
>>> using near by ips
>>> *c
