On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Brion Vibber wrote:
> Only the parser is being used right now, in two places:
> - on the JavaScriptMinifier test cases to confirm that results are valid JS
> (should be extended to a fuzz tester, probably)
> - on each individual file loaded via ResourceLoaderFileMo
On 07/06/2011 03:04 PM, Brion Vibber wrote:
> Some of you may have found that ResourceLoader's bundled & minified
> JavaScript loads can be a bit frustrating when syntax errors creep into your
> JavaScript code -- not only are the line numbers reported in your browser of
> limited help, but a broke
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:18 PM, K. Peachey wrote:
> How is JSMin+ different to the plain JSMin that we had and was removed
> due to licensing conflicts?
>
It's a different program, written by different people, based on code from
another unrelated project, under a different license.
"Open Source
How is JSMin+ different to the plain JSMin that we had and was removed
due to licensing conflicts?
(See: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2011-January/051308.html
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26791)
___
Wikitech-l mailing
Some of you may have found that ResourceLoader's bundled & minified
JavaScript loads can be a bit frustrating when syntax errors creep into your
JavaScript code -- not only are the line numbers reported in your browser of
limited help, but a broken file can cause *all* JS modules loaded in the
same