On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Pine W wrote:
> Is there any easy way to find all of citations of specified academic
> articles on Wikipedias in all languages, and the text that is supported by
> those references, so that the citations of questionable articles can be
>
Ryan, can we get an update about when
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Community_Tech_team/Community_Wishlist_Survey
will be launched? Thanks!
Pine
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Ryan Kaldari
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Pine W wrote:
On 08/18/2015 05:42 AM, Pine W wrote:
Is there any easy way to find all of citations of specified academic
articles on Wikipedias in all languages, and the text that is supported by
those references, so that the citations of questionable articles can be
removed and the article texts can be
Per earlier discussion in this thread...
New mailing list created:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/community-tech
The old mailing list will be deleted shortly.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Luis Villa lvi...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Tilman Bayer
Ryan Kaldari wrote:
Per earlier discussion in this thread...
New mailing list created:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/community-tech
The old mailing list will be deleted shortly.
Thanks!
MZMcBride
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
1. I was thinking of a tool that would let users input a variety of ways
of referring to the retracted articles, such as DOI numbers (Peaceray is an
expert in these). The tool would accept multiple inputs simultaneously,
such
Thanks for the info, Tilman.
I ended up looking at the Community Tech page on MediaWiki, which says that
their scope of work includes Building article curation and monitoring
tools for WikiProjects, so the kind of tools that we're discussing here
seem to be within their scope.
Ryan, you seem to
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the info, Tilman.
I ended up looking at the Community Tech page on MediaWiki, which says
that their scope of work includes Building article curation and monitoring
tools for WikiProjects, so the kind of tools that
Related discussion from 2012:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine/Archive_26#Creating_a_bot_to_search_Wikipedia_for_retracted_papers
(afaics it resulted in the creation of the {{retracted}} template, but
no bot)
The Community Tech team has its own mailing list now
1. I was thinking of a tool that would let users input a variety of ways of
referring to the retracted articles, such as DOI numbers (Peaceray is an
expert in these). The tool would accept multiple inputs simultaneously,
such as all 64 articles that were retracted in a batch. The tool would
return
Is there any easy way to find all of citations of specified academic
articles on Wikipedias in all languages, and the text that is supported by
those references, so that the citations of questionable articles can be
removed and the article texts can be quickly reviewed for possible changes
or
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Tilman Bayer tba...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Luis Villa lvi...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Researching the possibility of migrating all mailing lists to a newer
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Researching the possibility of migrating all mailing lists to a newer
system sounds
like a good project for Community Tech
I've been pushing to keep the team focused on things that can show a direct
impact on
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Luis Villa lvi...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Researching the possibility of migrating all mailing lists to a newer
system sounds
like a good project for Community Tech
I've been pushing to keep
Hi!
This project sounds like a good idea, but I don't really understand how it
would work as a tool. There's no API for retracted journal articles. It
seems like the best way to handle it would be when you find out about a
retracted journal article to just search Wikipedia for the title of
15 matches
Mail list logo